The Pros And Cons Of Antitrust Laws

984 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: anti trust laws

Antitrust laws are a collection of federal and state laws that regulate the business practices of large companies in order to promote and protect fair competition within an open-market economy. These laws prevent businesses from taking part in unfair business activities such as, but not limited to, price fixing, market allocation, and bid rigging. Price fixing is when two or more competitors agree to each charge the same price for a product and not undercut each other. Market allocation is when competitors agree to divide markets among themselves, you stay out of my territory and I’ll stay out of yours. Bid rigging is when several businesses within a market agree to take turns winning and losing bids in order to maintain market control and prevent competition. As you can imagine, these unlawful business …show more content…

The Sherman Act made it illegal for competitors to make agreements that would limit competition, this law also made it illegal for a business to operate as a monopoly if that business is not competing fairly. The Sherman Act succeeded in breaking up trusts but as business practices in America began to change companies found a new way to control price and production. Rather than forming trusts, competitors would unite into a single company, this new strategy to control price and production is called merging. Congress passed The Clayton Act in 1914 in order to combat this new business strategy, The Clayton Act helps protect consumers by banning mergers that are likely to significantly decrease competition. Also in 1914, Congress enacted the Federal Trade Commision Act (FTC) which created a federal agency to watchover markets and prevent unfair business practices from taking place. The FTC has the authority to investigate and stop unfair competition strategies and deceptive practices. Although these laws were enacted a long time ago, they continue to protect consumers and market

Show More
Related

  • Monopolies In The Gilded Age

    1325 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unfortunately, these monopolies allowed companies to raise prices without consequence, as there was no other source of product for consumers to buy for cheaper. The more competition, the more a company is forced to appeal to the consumer, but monopolies allowed corporations to treat consumers awfully and still receive their business. Trusts were bad for both the consumers and the workers, but without proper representation, they could do nothing. However, with petitions, citizens got the first anti-trust law passed by the not entirely corrupt Congress, called the Sherman Act of 1890. It prevented companies from trade cooperation of any kind, whether good or bad. Most corporate lawyers were able to find loopholes in the law, and it was largely ineffective. Over time, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, and the previously passed Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which regulated railroad rates, grew more slightly effective, but it would take more to cripple powerful

    Read More

  • Sirius and XM Satellite Radio as a Monopoly

    798 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since this debate still rages on, many people argue both sides of the story of the pros and cons. Many would argue that not breaking up monopolies actually increase the competition of companies that are attempting to break into some of the market share that the monopoly already has, more so than the free market that exists now. Proponents of the Sherman Anti-Trust act argue that “absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Martin, 1996) as originally quoted by Baron Acton. The idea that no competition within the business world establishes no risk and reward that is all part of the entrepreneur spirit of the U.S. spirit.

    Read More

  • Laws for Fair, Balanced and Competitive Business Practice

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Sherman Act outlaws every contract, combination or conspiracy in restraint of trade. It also prohibits any attempt to monopolize. The Sherman Act enforcement can be civil or criminal. The criminal penalty can be up to $1 million for an individual and $100 million for a corporation. The Federal Trade Commission Act bans unfair methods of competition and deceptive acts or practices. Violation of Sherman Act also violates Federal Trade Commission Act. The Sherman Act and Federal Trade Commission Act are very effective, but they do not address certain specific practices. The Clayton Act addresses some specific practices such as mergers and interlocking directorates. For example, Section 7 of Clayton Act prohibits mergers and acquisitions that lessen competition or tend to create monopoly. Apart from these three core antitrust acts, most states also have antitrust laws. (FTC, 2014)

    Read More

  • Major Federal Anti-trusth Laws in the United States

    669 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Clayton Act that was passed just 34 years later in 1914 does not have criminal penalties such as the Sherman Act. This act will not allow for a merger to happen that will diminish the competition of a produ...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Monopolies

    834 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many companies and individuals have committed monopolies before they were considered illegal and afterwards. A monopoly is when one person has complete control over a company and makes close to 100% of the profits. Since The Sherman Antitrust Act passed on April 8, 1890, “combination in the form of trust and otherwise, conspiracy in restraint of trade;” monopolizing an industry became outlawed. In simple terms the act prohibited any forms of monopoly in business and marketing fields. Monopolies committed before the Act, at the time, legal, but unethical, some famously known marketers like John D. Rockefeller became extremely wealthy. While others took full control of corporations after The Sherman Antitrust Act caused a firm like Microsoft

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The Sherman Antitrust Act

    1447 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before the act, although monopolies were legal, it opened the door for federal investigations into good monopolies and bad monopolies. The act prevented the industries from obtaining too much power, however, the Sherman Antitrust Act was not completely efficient. The vague language used in the Sherman Antitrust Act proved it easy for companies to find legal loopholes, allowing them to engage in otherwise restricted business. The Clayton Antitrust Act was introduced in 1914 to clarify the principles the Sherman Antitrust Act set out to do. While the Sherman Antitrust Act said that monopolies were illegal, the Clayton Antitrust Act “defined as illegal certain business practices that are conducive to the formation of monopolies or that result from them. For example, specific forms of holding companies and interlocking directorates were forbidden.” (Britanica) This legislation was influential and was used to dissolve many monopolies in years to

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Competition

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    Competition is what comes daily when individuals are in major industries such as drink companies. Individuals are always striving to better their merchandise, increase their sales and make a profit. While serving their customers they are constantly striving to produce carbonated drinks, water, energy drinks, Gatorade and more. Companies are out for sales, marketing, customers and profits.

    Read More

  • Merger of Health Care Companies

    954 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before granting merger forms The Bureau of Competition was committed to ensuring that involved companies do not create a monopoly in the market and hence reduce competition that may also affect the integrity of the services provided. In most cases the bureau controlling the start and the running of mergers uses the Hart-Scott-Rodino amendments to the Clayton Act (Clark, 2011). Before becoming a part of the merger it is important that FTC does an analysis of the merger to evaluate the effects the merger may have on the businesses. In addition, it is important that FTC gets to have a clear picture of the situation and how it is expected to affect the relations...

    Read More

  • Sherman Antitrust Failure

    1786 Words  | 4 Pages

    Without precise definitions, US Courts were unable to effectively “give precise legal meaning to the law” (Sherman go.galegroup.com). This meant that the court could rule in favor of large corporations that infringed on antitrust laws, such as in United States v. E. C. Knight Company. Additionally, failure to mention labor unions had a particularly devastating effect. Employers continuously used the Sherman Antitrust to take down the efforts of labor unions and to suppress workers who attempted to take a stand against corporations. Most court cases ruled in favor of the employers, further halting union activities. By the beginning of the 20th century, the Sherman Antitrust had failed in every aspect of its original

    Read More

  • Sherman Antitrust Act

    283 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 are two things that work together to help explain and prohibit things that people believe are wrong in the world and definitely hurts peoples and the governments wallets.

    Read More

  • Doubtful Trust In Baseball

    1232 Words  | 3 Pages

    Anti-trust laws are laws which prohibit anti-competitive behavior and unfair business practices. Their purpose is to make sure that businesses and consumers cannot be abused by powerful firms that hold or wish to hold a monopoly in the market. They also take into account certain ethical standards, and therefore can be considered quite subjective. Many specific strategies are outlawed by anti-trust laws, including price fixing (agreement on prices of uniform goods or services), predatory pricing (setting a low price in order to knock off competitors), and vendor lock-in (virtually forcing a consumer to buy from a certain supplier).

    Read More

  • Federal Trade Commission Summary

    695 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article, “The Possible Benefits of the Federal Trade Commission” by Alexander W. Smith, it addresses competition in trade as warfare, and furthermore, it notes how the Federal Trade Commission is for the people (1916). This means the sum of all of the businesses, government, and politics must be regulated by the Federal Trade Commission in order to be serving the public’s best interests (Smith 1916). Smith argues the “obvious cause of the trust problem is the unlimited power to create corporations now lodged in the several states with no adequate power vested anywhere to control them” (1916). Based on this statement, it reiterates the importance how if there is not enough regulation for corporations, the public will suffer due to the

    Read More

  • Industrial Trusts In The Gilded Age

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    One important effort was the Sherman Antitrust Act, which was passed by Congress in 1890, and it required the gov’t to pursue trusts that

    Read More

  • Progessives and The Pure Food and Drug Act

    859 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many businesses used this new process to raise the price of their competitors. They did this by putting constraints on entry restrictions (Woods 1986). At the state level, other laws were put in place to support the Food and Drug Act mainly to help local and area producers who were and would be facing new nat...

    Read More

  • Fair Business Practices: Why Do We Need It?

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1890 Congress passed the Sherman act with their first attempt at protecting businesses and consumers (FTC, 2008). This act was to touch down on monopolization and unreasonable trade. In order to protect consumers and businesses it was decided that monopolization; or the practice of controlling a single market, was an unfair act. Not only do monopolies have the ability to play with prices, but they can also decrease the quality of their products (Amadeo, 2013). For the consumer it could be unfortunate if, for example, the only supply of baby formula is controlled by a single company and the price increased by 40% after competition has been knocked out.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Antitrust Laws

Open Document