The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

638 Words2 Pages

If you have to trade and animal for a human, why not keep the animal? Animal testing is used around the world to subsequent of the demolish of using humans as testis. They have been used for research as long ago as “1922 when animal testing allowed for insulin to be isolated from dogs”, yet now we are just starting to realize the animals and how they might be hurt. Animals, they do a lot more to help us than most people never realize. They are the only other living thing closes to humans to be tested on. They have shortened life cycles so it won’t affect them so long term if anything were to go wrong, unlike humans. And to be frank they have no real rights, so it’s partially ok. What about all of the medical breakthrough that we have had over the last 100 years? We have a lot to say thanks to animals, but we are still complaining.

Animals are used every day around the world to try out new products that we benefit from. Including: hair products, lotions, make-up, and eye solutions. But what would happen if we were to not use animals? Would we simply guess how it reacts to humans and animals without using anything to prove that it is safe? No, we would use the closes thing to animals, humans. Humans would be the new Guiney Pig of all this major corporations to test their new products on. What is the point in using humans to test other human products? People never usually look past what is going to happen if we were to stop testing them, like what we would use instead.

“No adequate alternative to testing on a living, whole-body system” says animal testers.Everything else like fungi, rocks, and other non-living things don’t have genes or aren’t living. This contributes to the fact that we are the only other thing to use without hur...

... middle of paper ...

...ill be living in fear of a common cold. What about an animal and the causes of what happens if they can’t be tested on? They don’t get to have the medicine that they need to stay well also. It’s not just the medicine to get well but also the shots that we take to keep us and the animals healthy. They are experimented on to benefit our needs and theirs so that everyone is all good when they need it or not.

To sum everything up, yes I do believe that animals should be tested, purely on the fact that we need them for everyday things. Although some of the things that go on during animal testing are cruel but so is life so I can complain.. “We all benefit from the use of laboratory animals in biomedical research!”and i would have to agree with AMP, we do. Without them, I believe that we would be in a place of sickness like before the consideration of using animals

The Horrors of Animal Testing
531 Words | 2 Pages
These animals used for testing products commonly include mice, rats, rabbits, monkeys, hamsters, guinea pigs, dogs and cats. These animals are forced to test new products before they are sold to humans, and even though there are numerous valid substitutes for us to test products on, the law doesn’t require that we do. What’s even more horrifying is that no animal experiment is illegal, and therefore these ‘tests’ can be completely irrelevant to human health, and no matter how painful or cruel the test may be to animals it is completely legal. Some companies that test their products on animals include Almay, Johnson & Johnson, Clearasil, Axe, Lancôme (owned by L’Oréal), and Pantene (owned by Procter & Gamble).
Read More
Animal Testing Dbq
597 Words | 2 Pages
One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test
Read More
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
1737 Words | 4 Pages
“If you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal that hasn't done anything? They should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. So, rather than seeing if perfume irritates a bunny rabbit's eyes, they should throw it in Charles Manson's eyes and ask him if it hurts.” (DeGeneres, DG). Think about those animals imprisoned in cold cages, having nothing to do but wait, waiting in fear, knowing that when the time comes their cages will be opened, but not to set them free. Unable to react, unable to defend themselves, they rot in pain and mourn with isolation. And yet all we, humans, do is sit back and watch them suffer. Animal testing is the abuse of animals to develop new products. Although some people are against animal testing others agree that animals are needed in researches to find upgraded and new cures for developing diseases, to find advanced aesthetic products, and to find refine household products leading to a more satisfying quality.
Read More
The Pros of Animal Testing
1427 Words | 3 Pages
Albert Sabin, the developer of the polio vaccine once said, “Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Polio is a deadly disease caused by a virus that spreads from person to person. This infectious disease renders the brain and spinal cord helpless while also ensuring a permanent case of paralysis to the victim. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “…13,000 to 20,000 para-lytic cases were reported annually,” before the 18th century. After the introduction of the polio vaccine, “…a total of 2,525 paralytic cases were reported, compared with 61 in 1965.” This dramatic decrease in the prominence of the polio disease can only be attributed to the success of animal testing. Animal experimentation is used in the research of genetics, drug testing, biology, toxicity testing, cosmetic testing, and many other fields. Despite all of its beneficial traits, animal testing has been wildly controversial over the past decades because of its perceived unethical treatment towards animals. Although animal testing may be deemed unethical by many, it is a form of medical testing that has not only saved lives but has also greatly revolutionized the medical world.
Read More
Essay On Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
947 Words | 2 Pages
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation and animal research, is using various nonhuman animals experiments, whether it be a psychological or physical test of the animal, or testing medicines and cosmetics to determine if they are good enough for human use and consumption.This specific kinds of research are often conducted at various medical institutes, universities, pharmaceutical companies, and commercial facilities that does the task of testing the products on the animals. Each year, more than 100 million animals are used and die in the name of scientific research. Those animals include rats (12%), frogs (1%), cats (0.8%), dog (0.6%), mice (69%), monkeys (0.1%), guinea pigs (1%), rabbits (1%), fish (10%), and birds (4%). (BBC) Just like anything else, animal research has its pros and cons, but in this case, the cons severely outweigh the pros.
Read More
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
1193 Words | 3 Pages
“According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means.”(Peta). Have you ever wondered if a product you own was safe to use? Did you know that millions of animals are tested on each year for the daily products you use? According to Peta, around 26 million animals are tested each year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare uses (Peta). Animals are harmed or sometimes even killed in this process. Animals are not the same as humans, therefore; the testing done on Animals is not helping our human society, it’s hurting the animals. There are alternative ways to performing testing rather than testing on animals.
Read More
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
845 Words | 2 Pages
In my opinion, I think that if there is an alternative way in getting the same test results, then animal testing should be avoided. If the use of animals is required in order to obtain more knowledge of medicine then I believe that the welfare of the animals should be a priority of the researchers and if the well-being of the subjects is compromised then measures should be taken to correct these mistakes. I am not an advocate of abusing animals in order to advance research, but I do believe that the use of animals in research studies is extremely beneficial. Without the use of animal testing researchers would not have as many answers and solutions to problems that we have, such as sickness.
Read More
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
1983 Words | 4 Pages
...e outrageously painful and sometimes deadly to the animals. How on earth is that humane? Some animals even end up having permanent disabilities from all the chemical testing. The findings and conclusions from animal testing rarely work the same way on humans and an enormous amount of money is spent on failed attempts. The rate of success of transferring test results to humans is too low to justify the expense. Taxpayers would be wise to invest this money in alternative methods such as technological advancements. While it may not be possible to completely diminish animal testing, significant reductions need to be made in order to advance the state of technology and improve overall results. Advancements in medicine must be made without perpetuating needless suffering to helpless creatures. Testing needs to stop; animals don’t deserve any of this painful punishment.
Read More
Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation
1261 Words | 3 Pages
In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcasted their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of
Read More
Pros of Animal Experimentation
921 Words | 2 Pages
Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.
Read More
Animal Testing: The Most Harmful Effects Of Animal Testing
731 Words | 2 Pages
Many drug administers reports that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in people so we are killing animals just so we can get medicine and drugs that don’t even work for us so why even test the animals if we are going to fail when the drug and medicine passes the animals test and it’s pretty obvious that animals has quality’s like us but they’re not exactly like us like how pigs have the same type of skin like material that we have but it’s not exactly the same as our skin so just because they make a skin lotion that works on pigs it doesn’t mean that it going to work exactly the same way that it worked on the pig it might even killed you or give you a skin disease so basically there is no reason to use animals for testing because it might not even work for us even though it worked for th...
Read More
Medical Beneifits Of Animal Testing
390 Words | 1 Pages
Is the use of animals in research justified? Should animal experimentation be permitted? Should these animals be liberated? A logical person would say the benefits justify the research. Without animal testing, products would be based on theory. No one would want to use something, which may damage eyes, be poisonous, cancerous, and cause birth defects. Animals used in testing are not from the endangered species list; also many of the types of animals used are killed each year by rat or mouse traps, animal control, exterminators, and animal shelters. Animal testing reaps great benefits such as finding effective drugs to combat disease, improve surgical procedures, and make products safe.
Read More
The Barbaric Nature of Animal Testing
898 Words | 2 Pages
Animals should not be victims of vivisection when they have just as much of a right to be here as we do. The money used for animal testing could be used for a project with better potential. Animal testing should not be acceptable considering all the alternatives that technology has the power to do. The abuse of animals in medical experiments is a flaw on humanity, the sooner we end it, the better.
Read More
The Cons of Animal Testing
1354 Words | 3 Pages
At this moment, millions of animals know cold cages in laboratories as home, but why? Some of these animals are subjects for medical research purposes, while others are used out of pure curiosity and to test different products. Majority of these animals are used in painful experiments and are left in agony. While many of them die, a few animals survive, but these unfortunate ones wish they could be put out of their misery as well. Although scientists have resources they could use to lower the pain each animal endures and even alternatives of their test subjects, millions of innocent creatures are still suffering. The fact that animals are still used when animal experimentation is avoidable and not necessary makes animal testing unethical.
Read More
Pros Of Animal Testing
434 Words | 1 Pages
Imagine your sweet cat locked in a cage inside a laboratory with other various animals. Millions of animals every year are locked up in labs for testing. Animals are used to test medications, cosmetics, biology lessons, and for medical training. Thousands of mice, rats, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are used for testing. Most of these animals will die in cruel testing experiments. Animal testing is tortures to the animals, an unreliable option for medication, and there are better safer options for testing.
Read More

Open Document

Wait a second!

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

The Horrors of Animal Testing

Animal Testing Dbq