Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of agriculture
economic growth OF AGRICULTURE india ESSAY
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of agriculture
The agriculture sector contributed more than half the output of the Indian economy when the country embarked on its First Five-Year Plan in 1950-51. Over a period of six decades, the share of agriculture has gradually declined to less than 15 percent. Even in the rural economy, the share of the agricultural sector has declined to 38 percent of the total income generated in rural areas (2004-05). Despite its shrinking share in national income and losing its dominance in rural income, the performance of the agricultural sector remains a matter of central concern to policy makers and the public at large (Chand et. al., 2012). As a concomitant of growth, the share of agriculture and allied sector in gross domestic product …show more content…
Slow growth in agricultural productivity means slow improvement in the welfare of those dependent on it, as evident in emerging trends (for example, widening gap between agricultural and non-agricultural labour productivities, excess family labour remaining on farms, declining profitability on small farms). This need not be the case, as the experience of comparator countries with very different factor endowments shows. China, with a much larger share of workforce in agriculture than India, and Brazil with a much lower share, have both made remarkable progress in improving the standard of living of their agricultural population with significantly faster growth in agricultural productivity than India (Gautam, 2016). A singular characteristic of Indian agriculture is the predominance of small and marginal farms (1.16 ha in 2010-11). However, empirical studies indicate that small size of land holdings are not a deterrent to increasing productivity, which is determined by focused research and investments, access to modern inputs, appropriate technology, and innovative marketing systems to aggregate and market the output efficiently and effectively (Economic Survey, 2013-14). The agricultural workers especially small and marginal farmers (less than 2 hectares of land) constituted 84.97 in
...struggling to earn any income at all and sometimes do not even get the opportunity to eat. Another issue that Raj Patel did not touch on is the lack of care consumers have for the farmers. It seems that consumers care about farmers about as much as the corporations do, which, in my opinion, is not a lot. When consumers only care about low prices and large corporations only care about making a profit, the farmers are left out to dry. Many consumers believe “food should be available at a bargain price, a belief that relies on labor exploitation and environmental exhaustion at multiple points along the commodity chain.” (Wright, 95) Corporations as well as consumers generally tend to be selfish and I think Raj Patel is afraid to mention this. If only these people cared a little bit more about each other I believe the hourglass of the food system will begin to even out.
The developed world’s love affair with local/organic farming (peasant farming as Collier describes it) has decreased food production worldwide because it does not use the land efficiently enough as with commercial agriculture companies. It also requires government subsidies that large commercial farming companies do not necessarily need. By increasing commercial farming, the world food supply will inevitably increase over a short period.
In order to come to a conclusion as to which processes were the most important in leading to the development of agriculture it is necessary to compare and contrast examples from various regions of the world. I have chosen to concentrate on Southwest Asia (particularly the Levant area), North America and East Asia. The processes discussed include the influence of climate change and the tendency towards a sedentary lifestyle amongst hunter-gatherer groups. Also the settling in small communities for longer periods in areas conducive to farming, the development of year round settlements into villages and the construction of ritual or communal sites which indicate advanced organisation of people. The beginnings of symbolism and cognitive behaviour may also contribute to the development of agriculture.
Clever Hans would go to see his fiancée named Gretel in the morning and ask for something, when Gretel gives him a gift he mishandles it and loses the gift. Foley interprets the information of numerous sources and presents his data in a professional manner. He conveys his ideas about the nature of agriculture with a high degree of education, identifying the issues in agriculture, and stating solutions to rectify imperfections in the agriculture system.
In this paper I discuss several assigned articles with regard to the assumptions, focus, time and space contexts, stated purpose, and comparison between certain articles. Except for one article, all articles in this weekly reading are assumed to use post-structuralist paradigm. In their article, Lobao & Meyer (2001) encourage the readers to use combination of macro, meso, and micro approach in understanding agricultural transformation rather than only macro approach. For example, they urge the Human Ecology Theory (PEP), which is micro theory about individual’s adaptation to the dynamic of environment like population density, culture and technologies, and bio-physical environment. They criticize the PEP paradigm as heavily oriented in structural approach, neglecting the dynamic of socio-psychological factors of individual and social practices. For Lobao & Meyer, micro level of the household dynamic is crucial to understand the survival mechanism of the smallholder farmers to seek “strategic business behavior” (p. 112). Moreover, gender division, particularly with regard to the struggle of women in on-farm and off-farm activities is important. The Lobao and Meyer’s article also highlights the regional context of agri-related policies, such as agricultural loans which tend to be biased to certain ethnic groups, a fact that may be overlooked by the PEP. For comparison, Bernstein’s article is also in similar vein, in which he looks at the case of Green Revolution in India as not “resource neutral” (p. 61), by giving more access to the richer farmers to any program innovation packages (like credits, supply of inputs, and information). Lobao & Meyer’s article’s on famers’ action in politic to defend their interests ...
. Rao (2008) in his study on rural credit has discussed some of the lively issues of rural credit in India, that are; the increasing substitution of capital for labour in agriculture due to diversion of cheap credit for bigger farmers by commercial banks, significant slowing down in the share of the short-term loans in relation to the share of fertilizers in the eastern and western states despite
Carswell, G., 1997. Agricultural Intensification and Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Think Piece. IDS Working Paper 64, Brighton: IDS.
Unfortunately, in Pakistan farmers are poor and they have low level of incomes. Agriculture credit facilities are not common and easily available. Inadequate loan, high interest rate and untimely availability impact adversely crop productivity. That’s why poor farmers borrow from landlords and middlemen in Pakistan. It has been estimated that 50.8% farmers borrow from landlords at high interest rate (Khan 2012). In Pakistan, small farmers having 2 ha of land generally do not get credit facilities therefore they are unable to use the quality inputs. In this way, they get low crop yields. Limited availability of financing credits results in low agriculture productivity (Planning Commission
Generally, technological change in agriculture can be categorized as labor-intensive and capital-intensive system or it can be yield-increasing with affecting labour or capital intensity. Therefore, the impact of technological change in these directions become more complex and would have positive or negative impact depending on how much the agent is constrained in respective resources, to what extent market is imperfect to balance resource constraints, and what other institutional factors influences the movement of resource from intensive and extensive agricultural margins (Angelsen & Kaimowitz, 2001). Market or policies that increase output price or reduce input cost also found to have a contrary or minor impact in reducing crop land expansion. On one hand, profitability of agriculture could encourage farmer to use improved input and increase yield or it could create incentive to clear forest for additional production. Thus, the outcome depends on the availability of labour and land. Technological improvements and productivity gains potentially also make the agricultural activity more profitable and thus more attractive, resulting in an increase in total agricultural land rather than a reduction (Lambin & Meyfroidt, 2011) contrary to most of the theoretical assumptions. An increase in input price could have both effects on one hand, reduce the profitability of agriculture and hence, the area allocated to farming. On the other hand, farmers could replace fertilizer with other input, land, through expansion. Besides, access to credit or lower interest rate for capital also found to have resulted in expansion of land through relaxing farmers’ capital constraints. However, creation of off-farm income could not be a guarantee since increased income can be allocated to acquire extra land, which in the case of rural
Hazell et al. (2007) argue that if the United Nations Millennium Development Goals for poverty and hunger are to be achieved, governments and donors need to shift their attention to developing agriculture in general and strengthening small farms in particular. One example of research that supports this line of argument comes from Hazell et al. (1999) whose research concluded that drawing on evidence from small farms across the world, small multi -crop farms are more efficient than large mono-crop farms in providing better and more stable incomes for
...earch and extension, rural infrastructure, and market access for small farmers. Rural investments have been sorely neglected in recent decades, and now is the time to reverse this trend. Farmers in many developing countries are operating in an environment of inadequate infrastructure like roads, electricity, and communications; poor soils; lack of storage and processing capacity; and little or no access to agricultural technologies that could increase their profits and improve their livelihoods. Recent unrest over food prices in a number of countries may tempt policymakers to put the interests of urban consumers over those of rural people, including farmers, but this approach would be shortsighted and counterproductive. Given the scale of investment needed, aid donors should also expand development assistance to agriculture, rural services, and science and technology.
To understand why is agriculture important in the world of today, then first of all we must know what agriculture is? Agriculture is the basic material production of society, the use of land for agriculture and livestock, mining plants and animals as raw materials and labor to produce mainly food and some raw materials for industry. Agriculture is a major industry, covering many disciplines: planting, breeding and processing of agricultural products; in the broadest sense, also including forestry and fisheries. Agriculture is an important economic sector in the economy of many countries, especially in the past century , when the industry has not yet developed. Since the dawn of history, agriculture has been one of the importance means of producing
As agriculture has become more intensive, farmers have become capable of producing higher yields using less labour and less land. Growth of the agriculture has not, however, been an unmixed blessing. It, like every other thing, has its pros and cons. Topsoil depletion, groundwater contamination, the decline of family farms, continued neglect of the living and working conditions for farm labourers, increasing costs of production, and the disintegration of economic and social conditions in rural communities. These are the cons of the new improved agriculture.
It is generally said that the rural areas house up to 70% of India’s population. Rural India contributes a large chunk to India’s GDP by way of agriculture, self-employment, services, construction etc. As per a strict measure used by the National Sample Survey in its 63rd round, called monthly per capita expenditure, rural expenditure accounts for 55% of total national monthly expenditure. The rural population currently accounts for one-third of the total Indian FMCG sales.
In Pakistan, Agriculture plays an important role in the development of the country and is considered to be a consistent source for the income of the country. It is also contributing much in the GDP of the country and employs 45% of the country’s labor force helping in the growth of other economy sectors.