The Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Drugs

1047 Words3 Pages

== Harm Principle ==

My primary contention in this debate regards the idea of liberty to act based on our choices, as long as there 's no harm to anyone else. That 's why the government exists -- to enforce the law, a set of rules that ensure liberty. There 's no reason for the law to exist except to maximize benefit and to minimize harm. Government policy is decided on the basis of utilitarianism, and the sole justification for government is to allow people to gain pleasure if there 's no suffering. The idea is best articulated by John Stuart Mill 's "harm principle," which rests on a distinction between "self-regarding acts" and "other regarding acts." It holds that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member …show more content…

They harm nobody except the user of the drug. The user of the drug takes immense pleasure in their usage, and harms no one in the process. To win this debate, Con has to show me how the drug would harm others, rather than the users of the drugs. If Con fails to do that, I win because of the harm principle and government legitimacy.

== Benefits ==

There are multiple benefits to legalizing drugs, and harms to the status quo that legalization solves. Some of them are given below.

Children. When drugs are illegal, drug trade happens via the black market. In a place where drugs aren 't legal, therefore, there 's no regulating body for who consumes the drugs; there 's no legal way to ensure only certain people get drugs. This means, through drug dealers, people under the age of 18 gain access to "street drugs" and start using them. In contrast, when drugs are legalized, the black market goes out of business. This probably will be the case because, historically, criminal enterprises haven 't been able to compete with legal business (e.g. due to 80-90% less price). [2] As such, drugs can be regulated with an age limit and ID requirement, etc., ensuring that children -- who aren 't mature enough to make such a decision -- don 't get access to recreational drugs. Drug legalization in the United States has demonstrably reduced drug access to children. …show more content…

These cartels often fight with competitors, increasing violence, armed robbery, homicide and similar crime. Legalizing drugs will put cartels out of business, thus reducing crime significantly. [6]

Lives. In the Mexican Drug War, as a result of US intervention, around 1,000 children, 58 reporters, and 511 American civilians have been killed. [7] [8] If the United States stops intervention in the Mexican Drug War, and pressures Mexico to legalize drugs as well, around 20,000 lives can be saved annually. Legalizing drugs will also stop the existence of American cartels, and US business can compete against Mexican drug cartels, thus significantly reducing the latter, and perhaps ending the Mexican Drug War.

Economic benefits. First, $16 million has already been spent this year on the pointless "War on Drugs," so ending it will save a lot of money. In 2010, $15 million was spent the whole year on it. [9] Second, taxing drugs using "sin taxes," similar to taxes on tobacco and alcohol, will give the government a lot of revenue. Assuming similar rates to tobacco and alcohol, that means $46.7 *billion* could be made annually on such taxes. [10] Third, legalizing drugs would save roughly $41.3 billion in government expenditure to enforce drug laws annually. [10]

== Conclusion

More about The Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Drugs

Open Document