The Prevalence of Literacy in Ancient Greek and Roman Societies

2641 Words6 Pages

The ancient Greek and Roman civilisations boasted numerous writers, poets and historians, who left us an impressive intellectual heritage. But were common people literate as well in classical times, or were they relying on a body of professional scribes? After a brief explanation about the role of orality and the meaning of literacy in ancient times, the essay will examine some possible evidences of literacy from the ‘epigraphic habit’ in classical antiquity – as epistolary exchanges (Vindolanda Tablets), inscriptions on artefacts (ostraka, lady’s shoe from Vindolanda, the ‘Nestor Cup’), epitaphs and dedications on monuments (the Pantheon in Rome, the tomb of Eurysaces the Bakker) and several graffiti. It will be shown that some elements, depending on their interpretation, might substantiate the claim that most people were illiterate and relying on professional scribes – but other elements strongly confirm a widespread basic level of literacy. The essay will finally argue that, beyond the literate wealthy elite, there was a large part of the population that was semi-literate, able to interact with writings to some extent.
Literacy is basically defined as ‘the ability to read and write’ (Colins, 2003). In classical times, there was obviously an educated elite using writing to a large extent, for communication, political and artistic purposes: numerous works of high literary quality are part of our classical heritage. However, this does not imply that literacy was common among the population: a small group of scribes could be sufficient to serve the needs of an ancient society. For sure, lay people did not master writing to the level of famous ancient authors, but might have been literate to a certain extent. Therefore, it is better...

... middle of paper ...

... or craftsmen’s marks on products indicate that common people had some reading knowledge. Moreover, graffiti were quite common: for instance, the slogans written on the walls in Rome, according to Plutarch, in support of Tiberius Gracchus and his social reforms were certainly not written by the wealthy elite. Finally, epistolary exchanges, as Claudia Severa’s invitation to her birthday (among Vindolanda Tablets) confirm that a relative important part of the population was able to read and write missives – even if they might have relied on scribes for long texts. Therefore, the essay reached the conclusion that there was a continuum of literacy levels, with individuals only able to write their names, slow writers and real literate people. It can thus be said that, besides the social elite, a significant part of the population had a basic level of functional literacy.

Open Document