The Power of Precident in the Vassar v. Shaffer Case
574 Words3 Pages
The power of precedent to determine legal outcomes is a cornerstone of legal authority. Stare decisis is a prominent example of the reach of Latin diction in modern legal tradition, as it describes the doctrine of precedent that gives binding power to decided points of law. The importance of deciding current cases with relevantly similar facts analogously to precedent cases is essential for a stable body of law. In the current case between Liz Shaffer and Mary Vassar, controlling cases in the jurisdiction will decide the ultimate victor in the legal battle premised on the theory of proximate cause.
Such negligence is measurable on several tangible scales. First, cars are equipped with a symbolic warning system that alerts the driver of impending critical issues. For example, when gas is low or an engine is defective, a properly maintained vehicle will warn the driver with a series of sounds accompanied by dashboard icons. When brakes are faulty, the symbolic warning system will impart brake warning indicators that remain until the problem is corrected, thus rendering knowledge of t...