Okay, so back on track. Hmm…considering democracy. Even though liberals believe in an arbitrary government, their belief in democracy is in the fact that individuals determine who is to rule by regular competitive elections. Since they fear that the government will become tyranny, there are constraints such as a constitution, checks and balances and protection of human rights, to limit the power of the government. The democracy in itself also constrains the abuses of power amongst the individuals. Humans according to liberals are self-seeking ad selfish and can be dangerous when they have power. Power corrupts and ones a person has that power and ability to influence the decision of others, he or she can use the power for personal gains. It’s for this fear, that liberals consider a democracy through a limited government.
Contrary to this, anarchists believe in direct democracy and lobby for popular participation. But Naa in this modern age, how does one practice direct democracy with our large population? Which area will be big enough to hold such a population? Besides if we all go to the leaders with our problems, how long will it take for our complaints to be heard much less worked upon? That’s why I side with liberals on a limited representative democracy despite their fear of it.
Nevertheless, fascists embrace the idea of a totalitarian government. They believe that a true democracy is in absolute dictatorship as the leader is the best person endowed with ideological knowledge and he alone can make clear the actual desires of the people. They are of the stance that political parties and elections are corrupt and immoral. (Heywood, 2012) However, because I am of the notion that leaders have to be accountable for their actions ...
... middle of paper ...
...Smith termed the “invisible hand.” (Heywood, 2012) But an uncontrolled capitalist economy can lead to the exploitation of the poorer people in society. If a single individual were to be responsible for the production of water, which is a necessity good, it will be to the detriment of others when he decides to inflate prices whenever he wants to. This is why there has to be a government intervention to control prices of necessity goods like water and electricity to protect consumers.
Naa, I need to end here. My fingers are hurting from so much tying. Can you reply this letter to me when I’m seventy to know what you believe as at now? Don’t forget to tell me the thoughts that ran through your mind when you read this piece okay. I hope the much awaited fat finally covered the body and you stuck to the plan of just three children. My regards to the husband and children.
Liberalism is an ideology which advocates equality of opportunity for all within the framework of a system of laws. It includes a belief in government as an institution whose primary function is to define and enforce the laws. Furthermore, a Constitution, must be developed not solely by one ruler but by representatives of the elite groups. Therefore, liberalism invariably involves a belief in the need for legislative bodies which represent the influential groups. The Constitution then defines ...
Fascism is one of the great political ideology in the 20th century. It is a kind of authoritarian government that, according to Wikipedia, “considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the state, party or society as a whole.” Two of the most successful and to be in the vanguard of fascism government is Italian fascism – led by Benito Mussolini, and Nazi Germany – led by Adolf Hitler. Fascism in Italy and Germany, though in many regards very similar - have the same political ideologies, still have many aspects to them that make them different from each other.
The Constitution gave our country a frame work in which we have built into a great nation. Their idea is that the purpose of our system, meaning our democracy, is to protect an individual’s liberty. William Hudson tries to convince us that there should be a connection between the government we have today and the government in other countries, Parliamentary System. In chapter 1 of the textbook, Democracy in Peril, starts off by giving the reader background knowledge of the found fathers, signers of the Declaration of Independence and the drafters of the Constitution, which reflect as “democracy models” or “protective democrats.” What the founding fathers did not want to happen is for there to be a corrupt government which ignored the rights
Democracy is control by the people. On the surface, this appears to be a superior form, but as Plato warned it is slow to react, oppresses of the minority, and lacks skilled leaders (Perry,
Before pondering the extent of democracy one must determine what the term “democracy” means. Democracy is a “means of selecting policymakers and of organizing government so that policy represents and responds to citizens’ preferences.”i[i] The traditional democratic theory further explains the ideas behind democracy. The five aspects of this theory are that one man equals one vote, there is good voter-turnout, citizens can obtain knowledge through free speech and press, the general public controls government agenda, and an extension of all rights to all citizens.ii[ii] From this, one could say a true democracy would submit every bill to the public for a popular vote, like the traditional town meetings of old New England where all eligible voters met to have their say in governmental agenda.iii[iii] One could also say that democracy implies protection of rights and equal rights for all. Or, as Abraham Lincoln said, a democracy is “government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”iv[iv] The people make the government, they have a say in the agenda, and the government governs by the people’s consent. This ...
- Liberalism is a form of political structure where the powers of the government are limited against the people and their property
The book that I have choosen for the book review assessment is called The Arsenal of Democracy by A.J. Baime. The era in which this book takes place in the United States history is the period before World War 2 and during World War 2. This was right when Henry Ford was building cars and the auto industry was booming in America. One has to know the buildup to World War 2 and the years prior to it to understand the global influences to the author's main point. Events like industrial changes, interchangeable parts, the great depression, the rise of nazis germany, America view of the european war, and the battle of resources in World War 2. The author ,A.J. Baime, is a journalist that works for the New York Time magazine,Popular Science,
Throughout the course of history, mankind has been recorded to corrupt itself. Men have grown tired of simply surviving; they have had to take and conquer others. Absolute monarchies control wealth, land, and even lives of men. The conditions of the people were solely dependent on the conditions of the one who was in power in that particular place and time. History has proven that most men rule unwisely in their kingdoms. To avoid tyrannical rule, some make an attempt to set up a government in which the people ruled themselves. This form of government is called a democracy, or “rule of the people.” History has also revealed through the Greeks and the French Revolution, that a democracy that gives complete power to the people, “absolute democracy”, is nothing more than a short prelude to tyranny.
Idealists consider direct democracy superior to representative democracy. The representative system makes it possible to allow people as a whole to have a final world, to empower those who stand out for their skills and experience in political matters. Direct democracy tends to suppress minorities in the masses. Representatives can devote their time to government whereas the people on the whole cannot. A representative body provides better opportunities for objective participation whereas direct democracy is carried away by momentary emotion. Direct democracy is workable only in small population and area whereas representative democracy opens the way to large scale, even global, political integration.
It was during the 1920’s to the 1940’s that totalitarian control over the state escalated into full dictatorships, with the wills of the people being manipulated into a set of beliefs that would promote the fascist state and “doctrines”.
Democracy is not a contemporary phenomenon. It did not originate here in North America. Rather, its practice began---more than 2,000 years ago---in Athens, a city-state, in the Greek Mediterranean. The philosophers Aristotle and Plato attested to that fact in their writings. It is in Plato’s Republic that one finds the earliest definition of democracy, which is briefly, “the rule of the governed.” Plato compares democracy to monarchy, or rule of the one, oligarchy, or rule of the elite, and lastly, timocracy, or rule by property owners. Interestingly enough, the Republic’s author believed the rule of a philosopher-king was preferable to that of the masses. The Politics, written by Aristotle, provided a very robust explanation and justification of democracy, which will be detailed later in this paper. Nevertheless, democracy is synonymous with popular sovereignty or the notion that all within a human community have a say in the matters that affect them all.
Democracy: a government by the people, in which citizens rule either directly or through elected representatives - the latter description more relevant to today’s societies. Quite evidently, democracy is not perfect; like any other political system, it is subject to a plethora of flaws. For instance, it is no secret that voters tend to make illogical decisions – not out of sheer malice, but as a result of being wrongly informed. Politicians also make erroneous choices, whether they do so because they are dishonest or simply out of touch with the true will of their constituents. Further, anyone who has studied the government of a parliamentary democracy knows gerrymandering can have a powerful say in determining elections. Despite these and other flaws however, democracy still seems to work.
The United States government is what is known as a constitutional republic, meaning that citizens, rather than individually represent themselves, vote for legal representatives who act on their behalf. While the ideal version of this system would lead to candidates, “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” often times it becomes necessary for constituents to communicate with their chosen representatives in order to tell them exactly what it is they want. By allowing citizens to play a role in the actions of their government, the chance of tyrannical rule is diminished and the knowledge of the public also increases. While there are certainly weaknesses to a system where public opinion matters in policy, the benefits cannot be discounted. The issue then becomes how people best can send their message to the government, and how ought the government to interpret this information when making decisions.
The foundation of the modern political system was laid in the times when the world was strangled in slavery. In those moments, enlightened minds in Greek came up with the new system that was there to remain for the next thousands of years. This system, now known as democracy, is a form of government in which supreme power is vested to the people themselves. People have the right to elect their leaders directly or indirectly through a scheme of representation usually involving periodically held free elections. A new democratic government is usually established after every 4-5 years, and it is trusted with the responsibility to cater to the needs of all the people irrespective of the fact that they voted for them or not. Although the minorities may not be very pleased with the idea of democracy, however, a democratic government is certainly the best because it establishes social equality among people, reduces the conflicts in the state to a minimum, gives the chance to vote repeatedly, and creates patriotism.
In today’s world, democracy faces everyday challenges. These challenges affect each and every country. Each country has a particular way of encountering these challenges in order for the citizens to have some type of voice. The voice of the people makes a stronger impact on using democracy as a means to challenge the government of their country. As we take a look at the countries in the world today, we will see the path towards the challenges to democracy.