The Population Problem

2981 Words12 Pages
The Population Problem

Two hundred years ago, Thomas Malthus, in An Essay on the Principle of
Population, reached the conclusion that the number of people in the world will increase exponentially, while the ability to feed these people will only increase arithmetically (21). Current evidence shows that this theory may not be far from the truth. For example, between 1950 and 1984, the total amount of grain produced more than doubled, much more than the increase in population in those 34 years. More recently though, these statistics have become reversed.
From 1950 to 1984, the amount of grain increased at 3 percent annually. Yet, from 1984 to 1993, grain production had grown at barely 1 percent per year, a decrease in grain production per person of 12 percent (Brown 31). Also strengthening to Malthus' argument is the theory that the world population will increase to over 10 billion by 2050, two times what it was in 1990 (Bongaarts
36). Demographers predict that 2.8 billion people were added to the world population between 1950 and 1990, an average of 70,000 a year. Between 1990 and 2030, it is estimated that another 3.6 billion will be added, an average of
90,000 a year (Brown 31). Moreover, in the 18th century, the world population growth was 0.34%; it increased to 0.54% in the 19th century and in the first half of the 20th century to 0.84% (Weiskel 40). Neo-Malthusians base their arguments on the teachings of Thomas Malthus. Of the Neo-Malthusians, Garrett
Hardin is one of the most prominent and controversial. Hardin's essays discuss the problem of overpopulation and the effects it will have on the future. In
Lifeboat Ethics, he concludes that continuous increases in population will have disastrous outcomes. Neo-Malthusian arguments come under much scrutiny by those who believe that the population explosion is only a myth. Those who hold these beliefs state that the evidence Neo-Malthusians use to justify their views is far from conclusive. Critics hold that the Neo-Malthusian call for authoritarian control is much too radical. Thus, these critics belittle the theories of Neo-Malthusians on the basis that population is not a problem.
However radical Hardin's theories may be, current evidence shows that he may not be too far off the mark. It is hardly arguable that the population has increased in the past few decades, for current statistics show that this
a...

... middle of paper ...

...gy,
November 1993, pp. 88-92.

Day, Henry C. The New Morality: A Candid Criticism. London: Heath Cranton
Limited, 1924.

Douglis, Carole, and Gaylord Nelson. “Images of Home.” Wilderness, Fall 1993, pp. 10-23.

Hardin, Garrett. Stalking the Wild Taboo. Los Altos, California: William
Kaufmann, Inc., 1978.

Hardin, Garrett. The Limits of Altruism: An Ecologist's View of Survival.
London: Indiana University Press, 1977.

James, Daniel. “Close the Borders to all Newcomers.” Taking Sides: Clashing
Views on Controversial Political Issues. Ed. George Mckenna and Stanley
Feingold. 9th ed. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc., 1995.

Malthus, Thomas Robert. An Essay on the Principle of Population. Ed. Phillip
Appleman. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1976.

Mandel, Michael J., and Christopher Farrell. “The Price of Open Arms.”
Business Week, 21 June 1993, pp. 32-35.

Morganthau, Tom. “America: Still a Melting Pot?” Newsweek, 9 August 1993, pp.
16-23.

Thomas, Rich, and Andrew Murr. “The Economic Cost of Immigration.” Newsweek, 9
August 1993, pp. 18-19.

Weiskel, Timothy C. “Can Humanity Survive Unrestricted Population Growth?” USA
Today Magazine, January 1995, pp. 38-41.
Open Document