The Peloponnesian War

1268 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of peloponnesian war strategies

The Peloponnesian war (431–404 BC) was an ancient Greek war fought by Athens against the Peloponnesian led by Sparta. Thucydides famously claims that the war started “because the Spartans were afraid of further growth of Athenian power, seeing as they did have the greater part of Hellas was under the control of Athens”. The two main protagonists from opposing sides Lysander and Alcibiades had the most influential impact on the end of the war.

Lysander was appointed Spartan navarch for the Aegean Sea in 407 and undertook the major project of creating a strong Spartan fleet which could take on the Athenians and their allies. Lysander collected 70 triremes and took them to Ephesus; Lysander pitched camp there and ordered for merchant vessels to land their cargos there, thus reviving the business and market life of Ephesus with profit and hope. Lysander persuaded Cyrus, the great king’s son to help the Spartans fund an increase in the sailors pay thus inducing sailors serving in the Athenian fleet to come over to the higher paying Spartan fleet. “I earnestly request you to add one penny to the seamen’s pay, that instead of three pence, they may now receive four pence”. When Alcibiades the Athenian commander challenged Lysander to battle he declined making sure his troops were in good repair, when Alcibiades left his fleet at notium seeking funds the Athenian squadron was placed under the command of Antiochus. During the time Alcibiades was away Lysander managed to engage the Athenian fleet resulting in loss of several ships and death of Antiochus. This defeat enabled Lysander to gain partisans amongst the cities subject to Athens by promising to instil decemvirates.

Lysander sailed to various cities and ordered all Athenians to go ...

... middle of paper ...

...e ‘great Peloponnesian war’ novel, as it ends in mid-sentence, there is a great deal of uncertainty whether he intended to revise the sections he had already written. Much like Thucydides, Plutarch’s “parallel lives” was entirely subjective interpretation as he manipulated his material to fit his world view of life as a battle between good and evil, he also tweaked quotes to his need and focused on character not events to make moral judgements. The analysis of history generally occurs as a subjective work as interpretations and judgements are portrayed in works. History is better understood as a piece of literature rather than an objective record of the historical events which embodies the words of W.R connor who describes Thucydides as “an artist who responds to, selects and skilfully arranges his material and develops its symbolic and emotional potential”.

Show More
Related

  • Investigating Athens' Treatment of Her Allies

    4008 Words  | 9 Pages

    Thucydides accounts that the allies saw this as a great advantage – ‘Because of their dislike for Pausanias, [the allies] were glad to see her [Athens] do so’. Yet this seems terribly ironic considering the events that followed Athens’ promotion of leadership. Athens first task as leader was to assess the various forms of finance that were crucial to the league. It required a strong fleet of ships and strong funds in order to function.

    Read More

  • Plutarch's The Life of Crassus and Caesar

    1442 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plutarch presented history through biographical stories of the people that were important and influential during the time period he wished to address. However, after having read some of his work, one realizes that Plutarch inserts his own personal opinion and views of the people at hand into the factual documentation of their lives. For example, in The Life of Crassus, Plutarch expresses a general dislike and negative view of the man, but in The Life of Caesar he portrays the life through a lens of praise. It also seems that he uses his opinions of the people that he writes about to subtly extend moral lessons to the reader. What follows is a further isolation of Plutarch's opinions and lessons from within The Lives of Crassus and Caesar.

    Read More

  • The battle of antietam

    1536 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Battle of Antietam on September 17th, 1862 was the single, most bloodiest day in American History, where more than 23,000 men became casualties of war. General George Brinton McClellan’s inability to use Mission Command, as a warfighting function was a key reason this battle did not end the American Civil War. An analysis of General McClellan’s Mission Command operational process will show how his personality, bias, and fear were detrimental to the outcome of the Battle of Antietam.

    Read More

  • Sulla and the Downfall of the Roman Republic

    1710 Words  | 4 Pages

    His character traits are listed in three main accounts by authors A.J. Koutsoukis, Erik Hildinger, who are both current impartial historical non-fiction writers and, Plutarch. Plutarch was a Greek historian, biographer and essayist, who is most famous for his work Parallel Lives, where he focuses on all of the contributing rulers of the Roman Republic. Plutarch is very even handed and focuses on the influence of character and moral lessons that can be learned from these emperors, good or bad.

    Read More

  • The Battle of Antietam

    1924 Words  | 4 Pages

    September 16-18, 1862, outside of the town of Sharpsburg, Maryland, between the Potomac River and Antietam Creek, was the location of the bloodiest battle in American history. Confederate Colonel Stephen D. Lee described it as “Artillery Hell” because of the frightful toll on his gunners and horses from Federal counter battery and infantry fire. (AotW, 2014) The battle of Antietam, or the Battle of Sharpsburg, would collect an estimated 23,100 total casualties (Luvaas and Nelson, 1987). The body count far exceeded any of the other three battles waged in the Maryland Campaign (Harpers Ferry, South Mountain, and Shepherdstown). This battle was a contributing factor in the outcome of our country and the rest of the world. The Union Army desperately needed a victory at Antietam; however, a victory for the Confederate rebels may have very well gained them international recognition as a sovereign country in the eyes of the rest of the world. The Federal Army, which belonged to the Union States, consisted of an all-volunteer army and was a larger army than the Confederate States. Even though the Battle of Antietam was inconclusive, President Lincoln went on to read the Emancipation Proclamation to the country, effectively ending slavery, and ensuring that no foreign nation would intervene on the Confederates behave.

    Read More

  • Thucydides: Fear, Honor, And Interest

    273 Words  | 1 Pages

    Thucydides was right to claim that all wars can be explained by Fear, Honor, and Interest. All Wars are related to the three characteristics as stated by Dr. Nation (Dr. Nation video). The Athenians thought process was that the weak would be ruled by the strong and that was the nature of conflict (Strassler p. 43). Looking at the Peloponnesian war itself will illustrate how fear, honor and interest were involved with how this war developed. The initial unnamed Athenian that made that statement was probably using it to deter war with Sparta when it mostly incited the war (Dr. Nation Video). The Athenians wanted to maintain and sustain their city state but also expand it. They were expanding through their alliances and this is what invoked the

    Read More

  • A Comparison Of The Cold War And The Peloponnesian War

    1172 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The conflict of Athens and Sparta is supposed to serve as a lesson for what can happen to any people in any war in any age” (Hanson, 7). How Thucydides was right when he made this statement, when you compare the Peloponnesian War and the Cold War, the similarities are striking. Even though these wars occurred thousands of years apart the are very similar. They both lasted for many decades and even though the Cold War had not involved any fighting it has themes that echo all the way back to the Peloponnesian War where its occupants fought with crud weapons compared to today’s modern technology. The Peloponnesian War and the Cold War can be compared to the events leading up to the war, because of their common ambition in that the nations involved

    Read More

  • James Dashner's Maze Runner

    926 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "Peloponnesian War (ancient Greek History)."Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, 24 Dec. 2013. Web. 05 Apr. 2014

    Read More

  • The Peloponnesian War

    2333 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the Ancient Greek world, there have been many wars and standoffs. However, there has been only one which changed the course of Greek history forever; the Peloponnesian War. Caused by the growing tension between Athens and Sparta, it came and left, leaving only destruction in its wake. The defeat of Athens in the Peloponnesian War caused the downfall of Greece, and the end of the Classical Age.

    Read More

  • The Causes and Effects of the Peloponnesian War

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    The causes of the Peloponnesian War proved to be too great between the tension-filled stubborn Greek city-states of Athens and Sparta. As Thucydides says in Karl Walling’s article, “Never had so many human beings been exiled, or so much human blood been shed” (4). The three phases of the war, which again, are the Archidamian war, the Sicilian Expedition and the Decelean war, show the events that followed the causes of the war, while also showing the forthcoming detrimental effects that eventually consumed both Athens and eventually Sparta effectively reshaping Greece.

    Read More

  • What Is The Legacy Of Alexander Plutarch

    492 Words  | 1 Pages

    Fundamentally, the historical context relating to the document that influenced Plutarch to establish such a manuscript stems from his aspiratioFundamentally, the historical context relating to the document that influenced Plutarch to establish such a manuscript stems from his aspiration to accurately portray Alexander the Great’s underlying character, conduct, strengths, shortcomings and to leave behind a applicable historical reference for the future so that others could comprehend Alexander’s overall nature as an individual who is widely recognized. Plutarch’s lives or biography of Alexander was designed to encourage mutual reverence for Greek and Roman culture or the renowned individuals that greatly influence both cultures, in a series of biographies highlighting those individuals’ common virtues and vices. Plutarch was more concerned with writing biography than history, concentrating his efforts on the meritorious actions of his subjects as examples of noble behavior and not so much on the times in which they lived. He wanted Greeks and Romans alike to recognize the tremendous legacy, which they had inherited from the great men of the past that facilitated in profoundly influencing the future through their actions such as Alexander the Great. His aim was therefore clearly didactic. History, for Plutarch, has to do with the morals of these notorious historical figures, in which great individuals rise and fall by their strengths and weaknesses. His lives tend to be anecdotal and to focus on revealing stories.

    Read More

  • The Peloponnesian War and the Decline of Leadership in Athens

    3378 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Peloponnesian War and the Decline of Leadership in Athens Thucydides set out to narrate the events of what he believed would be a great war—one requiring great power amassed on both sides and great states to carry out. Greatness, for Thucydides, was measured most fundamentally in capital and military strength, but his history delves into almost every aspect of the war, including, quite prominently, its leaders. In Athens especially, leadership was vital to the war effort because the city’s leaders were chosen by its people and thus, both shaped Athens and reflected its character during their lifetimes. The leaders themselves, however, are vastly different in their abilities and their effects on the city. Thucydides featured both Pericles and Alcibiades prominently in his history, and each had a distinct place in the evolution of Athenian empire and the war it sparked between Athens and Sparta.

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Peloponnesian War

    1158 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.) was a conflict between the Athenian Empire and the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta that resulted in the end of the Golden Age of Athens. The events of the war were catalogued by the ancient historian Thucydides in The History of the Peloponnesian War. Thucydides’ writings showed the ancient Greek belief that there is a parallel between the city-state and the character of its citizens; in order for the city-state to be successful, its citizens must be virtuous. Thucydides did not believe that the true cause of the Peloponnesian War were the immediate policies of the Athenian Empire against the city-states in the Peloponnesian League but rather the fundamental differences in the character of the two city-states

    Read More

  • Human Nature in Realism and Liberalism

    1893 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thucydides. "History of the Peleponnesian War." Internet Archive. Edited by Charles Forster Smith. 1956. http://archive.org/stream/thucydideswithen01thucuoft/thucydideswithen01thucuoft_djvu.txt.

    Read More

  • Greek Golden Age Essay

    1034 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, being in a weakened state caused the Greek city- states (mainly Athens against Sparta) to fight amongst themselves in order to have more influence over the rest of the city-states. This type of war was termed the Peloponnesian War and continued from 431 B.C. to 404 B.C. in the year. History of Greece:The Golden Age of Greece and Muntone. The Peloponnesian War began around 431 B.C. and persisted for twenty-seven years.

    Read More

More about The Peloponnesian War

Open Document