Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
impact of the 9/11 attack
essay for the patriot act
essay for the patriot act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: impact of the 9/11 attack
On September 11, 2001, the United States was shaken when the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City fell and thousands were killed. The very real dangers of terrorism were made perfectly clear that day. The government had to find out why this atrocity had happened, and, more importantly, they had to stop it from happening again. But how could the U.S. stop an attack they never saw coming? Deciding the best route of action was to catch the terrorists before they could do any more harm, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, or USA PATRIOT Act, was passed.
The Act was approved by both the House of Representatives and Senate with very little opposition and was signed into law by President George W. Bush. This new act significantly cut restrictions on judicial power and gave legal authorities more control. Since its passage, the Patriot Act has been under severe scrutiny and has been considered one the most controversial acts passed under the American government. Most adversaries have critiqued the act by claiming that it is unconstitutional and infringes upon citizens’ rights. Accusations of the Patriot Act’s violations against the First and Four Amendments have been ongoing, despite several amendments to it. Opponents have asserted that the Act opens a door for potential governmental abuses of power, while supporters have maintained that it is not only constitutional but necessary, given the context of terror in today’s society. While there are some who claim that the USA PATRIOT Act breaches American citizens’ constitutionally guaranteed rights and poses potential abuses of power, the act is clearly a carefully constru...
... middle of paper ...
...Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment. New York: Nova Science, 2008. Print.
Etzioni, Amitai. How Patriotic Is the Patriot Act?: Freedom versus Security in the Age of Terrorism. London: Routledge, 2007. Print.
Ewing, Alphonse B., and Charles Doyle. The USA Patriot Act Reader. New York: Novinka, 2005. Print.
Hall, Kermit, James W. Ely, and Joel B. Grossman. The Oxford Guide to the Supreme Court of the United States. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005. Print.
Hudson, David L. "Libraries & First Amendment in Speech - Topic." First Amendment Center. Web. 25 Apr. 2011. .
Hudson, David L. The Bill of Rights: the First Ten Amendments of the Constitution. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow, 2002. Print.
Scheppler, Bill. The USA Patriot Act: Antiterror Legislation in Response to 9/11. New York: Rosen Pub., 2006. Print.
Less than one week after the devastating terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the U.S.A. Patriot Act was introduced to Congress. One month later, the act passed in the Senate with a vote of 98-1. A frightened nation had cried for protection against further attacks, but certainly got more than they had asked for. Russell Feingold, the only Senator to vote down the act, referred to it as, “legislation on the fly, unlike anything [he] had ever seen.” In their haste to protect our great nation, Congress suspended, “normal procedural processes, such as interagency review and committee hearings,” and, “many provisions were not checked for their constitutionality, lack of judicial oversight, and potential for abuse.” Ninety-eight senators were willing to overlook key civil liberty issues contained within the 342 page act. The lone dissenting vote, Wisconsin Senator Russell Feingold, felt that our battle against terrorism would be lost “without firing a shot” if we were to “sacrifice the liberties of the American people.” Feingold duly defended American civil liberties at the risk of his career, truly exemplifying political courage as defined by John F. Kennedy.
Gevinson, A. (2009, July 28). Supreme Court Nominations | Teachinghistory.org. Retrieved February 19, 2014, from http://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/22435
Cole, D., & Dempsey, J. X. (2006). Terrorism and the constitution: sacrificing civil liberties in the name of national security. New York: New Press.
Peter, Sagal. “Should There Be Limits on Freedom of Speech?” 25 March. 2013. PSB. PBS.com 14 Nov.
Jost, Kenneth. "The Federal Judiciary." CQ Researcher 8.10 (1998). CQ Researcher. SAGE Publications. Web. 01 Mar. 2011. .
In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks US Congress passed legislation known as the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 commonly known as the USA Patriot Act. This paper will attempt to prove that not only is the USA Patriot Act unconstitutional but many of its provisions do nothing at all to protect Americans from the dangers of terrorism.
September 11, 2001 was one of the most devastating and horrific events in the United States history. Americans feeling of a secure nation had been broken. Over 3,000 people and more than 400 police officers and firefighters were killed during the attacks on The World Trade Center and the Pentagon; in New York City and Washington, D.C. Today the term terrorism is known as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives (Birzer, Roberson). This term was clearly not defined for the United States for we had partial knowledge and experience with terrorist attacks; until the day September 11, 2001. At that time, President George W. Bush, stated over a televised address from the Oval Office, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” President Bush stood by this statement for the United States was about to retaliate and change the face of the criminal justice system for terrorism.
Sales, Nathan A. “The Patriot Act isn’t broken.” March 6th 2009, Vol. 101 Issue 69, Student Research Center. EBSCOhost. Frederick Community Coll. Lib, Frederick, MD July 10th
the National Digital Library. “The Bill of Rights.” The Library of Congress. 16 Oct. 1996. 2 Nov. 2003. http://www.memory.loc.gov/const/bor.html.
Since September 11, 2001 many people can say that America has changed. Many people question if America has changed for the better or has it just gotten worse. Since the day those four planes crashed around the United States people’s lives have been changed. Many may not realize how their lives have changed, but with new laws passed life is different within America. The United States Patriot Act is one of the laws passed after 9/11: singed into order on October 26, 2001 just 45 days after the attack. The United States Patriot Act was put in place in order to protect Americans, yet has been affecting American’s civil liberties and caused controversy all over the United States.
Shnayerson, Robert. The Illustrated History of The Supreme Court Of The United States. New York: Abrams, 1986.
Remy, Richard C., Gary E. Clayton, and John J. Patrick. "Supreme Court Cases." Civics Today. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe, 2008. 796. Print.
Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
After forty-five days had passed since the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001 Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act which stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism”. “This Act is a 342-page, sprawling piece of legislation that contains more than 150 sections and amends more than 15 federal laws”(USA). The laws that this act clearly “bypasses” goes completely against the U.S. Constitution which was drafted by bright and experienced men who wrote that document for a clear reason. To make a new government which does not cheat and unfairly treat its citizens. The Patriot Act “steps on every
Citizens feeling protected in their own nation is a crucial factor for the development and advancement of that nation. The United States’ government has been able to provide this service for a small tax and for the most part it is money well spent. Due to events leading up to the terrifying attacks on September 11, 2001 and following these attacks, the Unites States’ government has begun enacting certain laws and regulations that ensure the safety of its citizens. From the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 to the most recent National Security Agency scandal, the government has attempted and for the most part succeeded in keeping domestic safety under control. Making sure that the balance between obtaining enough intelligence to protect the safety of the nation and the preservation of basic human rights is not extremely skewed, Congress has set forth requisites in FISA which aim to balance the conflicting goals of privacy and security; but the timeline preceding this act has been anything but honorable for the United States government.