The Parody Paradigm

1024 Words3 Pages

Copyright infringement: The Parody Paradigm

Introduction
Whether it's the humor of Scary Movie that banks upon and picturized specific tongue in mouth references to other contemporary films or when it is Samsung seriously making fun of or satirizing Apple with the commercial for its new Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 tablet with reference to a pencil to Cheque De India, Bechare Zameen Parr and the popular AIB’s parodies these days, all stand out to be suitable daily life illustrations of commercial parody. After going through the practical examples, it’s necessary to throw light, on the theory bit, to develop a better understanding of the concept, that defines and elaborate upon, the act of deliberative exaggeration called PARODY.

What is parody??
The Princeton encyclopedia states “.. parody has been defined as the exaggerated imitation of work of art. Like a caricature it is based on distortion bringing into bolder relief the salient features of an artist's style or habit of mind. It belongs to genus satire and thus performs the double-edged task of reform and ridicule. Eccentricity, sentimentalism and pedantry are among its major targets, and at its best it is a critical instrument of telling force because it approaches the subject from within rather than from without..” In a nutshell parody can be put into simpler words as a criticism of the ideas and expression of another artist’s original work. The essence of a parody is its comic or satiric contrast to the serious work. What needs to be noted is that parody is considered as the oldest form of literary expression and hence has a variety of definitions that broaden its very meaning. To reason out the universal appeal of parodies, a twofold argument can be put forth; firstly what can...

... middle of paper ...

...oint out its defects. The second condition is explained in the latter case. In that case the court while holding that the counter drama in question was of the nature of a parody as it was a criticism directed at the original play relied upon three factors to derive that conclusion- a) the quantum of the matter taken from the original work in relation to the criticisms, b) the purpose and c) the likelihood of competition. Therefore through this decision the Kerala HC concluded that as long as the original work is copied for the purpose of criticizing it does not amount to improper use and thus would constitute fair dealing. On the other hand if a parody is made by adopting the same theme but is performed in a completely different manner from that of the original then the question of copyright violation itself will not arise as ideas and themes cannot be copyrighted.

Open Document