The Paradox Of Fiction Analysis

928 Words2 Pages

The desire for individuals to relate to fictional characters and their situations in comparison to reality is uncanny. Fictional characters offer an alternate reality, an escape from the distress of present life. Relative to reality, fictional characters have the capability to become integrated into similar situations that the viewer may be going through or have been through in the past. In most cases, the viewer does not feel completely comfortable dealing with their situation, rather, they would prefer to see themselves in the character of interest. With fictional characters, emotional attachment is limited, therefore, it becomes easy to get lost into alternate existence. Essentially, the paradox of emotional response to fiction attempts to explain why individuals are so moved by matters that do not exist. The principles that lie within said paradox appear to be reasonable, however, certain claims in this paradox such as the need for individuals to believe fictional situations existed to feel anything have the potential to be adjusted accordingly. The first principle of the paradox states that “in order for …show more content…

Each of these theories present possible resolutions to the paradox. Within the thought theory lies the premise that “although our emotional responses to actual characters and events may require beliefs in their existence, there is no good reason to hold up this particular type of emotional response as the model for understanding emotional responses in general,” (Schneider n.d.). Fictional characters are just that – a work of fiction. Unlike situations from reality where individuals can engage each of their senses into the matter, physical interaction is impossible regarding fictional scenarios. The only task at hand is to generate an emotive response due to entertaining an idea that is purely a figment of the

Open Document