The Other Side Of The River Analysis

643 Words2 Pages

In today’s civil society, we are taught to show compassion and tolerance towards one other, yet the media portrays society in a different perspective, as being intolerant. In the book The Other Side of the River, writer Alex Kotlowitz reflects on the story of a young black male whose lifeless body was found in the St. Joseph river of Michigan. In this story, Kotlowitz reflects on two communities that are opposite from the other in regards to ethnic background and financial well-being, yet both appear to share the same lack of tolerance towards the other. There is a paragraph were Kotlowitz writes,
It’s all about perspective -- which has everything to do with our personal and collective experiences, which are consistently informed by race. From those experiences, from our histories, we build myths, legends that guide us and constrain us, legends that include both fact and fiction (1).
In this paragraph, Kotlowitz is sharing his …show more content…

There are numerous accounts that have led society into believing a distort-ed perception of reality and becoming intolerant towards another. Back in 2001 after the unfortunate terrorist attacks on 911, America was quick to take actions in subduing these radical Muslim fanatics. Former President George W. Bush announced the declaration of a “War on Terror”, which was strongly opposed by the French Minister of Foreign Affairs and the county of France. Thus began the American boycott on France and everything relating to the country including the renaming of French fries to American fires. Regardless of the facts for France’s unwillingness in supporting the “War on Terror”, the social media went ablaze with anti-French sentiment, insuring that all Americans became intolerant towards France and anyone with French ethnic

Open Document