The Oppression Of Crimea

1610 Words4 Pages

On March 18, 2014, Russian President Valdimir Putin announced the annexation of Crimea, two days after voters in this semi-autonomous territory approved a referendum on separating from Ukraine. Crimea is an eastern Ukrainian peninsula located on the Black Sea. It’s connected to the rest of the Ukraine by a small strip of land. “Ukraine screams ‘robbery’ while Russians and Russian Crimeans feel Crimea is ‘coming back home’,” (Hodgman, 3/28/2014). Cremia was absorbed into the Russian empire along with most of ethnic Ukrainian territory by Catherine the Great in the 18th century. In 1921, the peninsula became part of the Soviet Union. Crimea only became part of the Ukraine when Soviet leader Njkita Khruschchev gave the peninsula to his native country in 1954. However, in 1991, the Soviet Union broke up and Crimea ended up in an independent Ukraine. Sixty percent of Crimea’s population of two million identify themselves as Russians. Today, Crimea’s population is divided on the issue of being annexed to Russia. Geographically, Crimea is an extension of Ukraine; however, demographically and politically, it had become Russian. Ethnic Russians in Crimea support the annexation while the Crimean Tatars, originally a Mongol-led ethnic group who also claims Crimea as home, and Ukrainians express pro-Ukrainian sentiments.
To understand the division of sentiments in Crimea, one needs to understand the intertwined history and culture of Russia, Crimea, and the Ukraine. Culture is a very complex idea without any concrete foundations, and is commonly understood to be the religious, linguistic and ideological processes shared amongst a collection of people. While it may seem easy to depict different cultures in everyday life, that is simply not th...

... middle of paper ...

...ty on the Black Sea peninsula. “Some Crimean Tatars denounced the proposal for autonomy as a betrayal of Ukraine. Others insisted it prevented another mass exodus and said safeguarding their right to live on the land they consider home was a priority” (Higgins, 4/02/2014). While the minority make up less than fifteen percent of Crimea’s population, it has been overwhelmingly opposed to Russia’s annexation of the peninsula. Russia claims Crimea is an inalienable part of Russia; however, Russia’s legacy of control remains for many Tatars a bitter one of trampled cultural beliefs and language, deportation, and general lack of recognition for the Crimean Tatars’ territorial rights. Russia’s unjustifiable annexation of Crimea is paved by its cultural identity, racism, and sense of place. The Crimean Tatars should not be forgotten or overlooked during the current crisis.

Open Document