Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparisons of nuclear and contemporary families
The rise of the nuclear family
The rise of the nuclear family
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparisons of nuclear and contemporary families
In this essay, I am going to be talking about nuclear families not
being the norm anymore. A nuclear family is a family that consists of
the mother, father and the child/children. A heterosexual relationship
between the mother and father, which would be based on love and
compassion. The mother’s role includes cooking for the family and
looking after the children. The father’s role includes providing
for the family and acting as a role model towards the children. The
children are offspring of both the mother and the father.
Years ago, nuclear families were the norm in Britain. It was required
that the relationship between a couple should be armoured by marriage.
Although this point isn’t really believed anymore, some people still
follow it-e.g. -Christians believe that couples should get married
before they have any sort of sexually relationship, or even children.
If your family wasn’t nuclear, you were considered as different to the
society. You would even be treated differently. Not having a nuclear
family would be a single mother with children, or a single father with
children (though in some cases the adult could be a widow/widower).
Another way of not being a nuclear family would even be being
single/not married! In those days they used the word spinster for
single women. (The word is not really used today, as it can be
offensive to single women, although some cultures still choose to use
it.)
Nowadays, nuclear families are NOT the norm AT ALL. In fact, there are
so many different types of families. There are single parent families,
adopted families (where the child/children has been adopted), foster
families (where the child/children has been fostered), gay and lesbian
families, reconstituted (otherwise known as stepfamilies) and many
many more. Personally, I think that the reason why nuclear families
are no longer the norm in modern Britain is because of the different
ways of life people have and the different views to life that people
have. For example, single people could decide to have a child and not
In the first half of the 20th century, Scottish families remained larger than those in England did. One of the theories behind this is that Scotland has a smaller middle class, (who on average, have less children per family) and a higher proportion of Roman Catholics, who do not believe in birth control.
Nuclear Family. Noun. A couple and their dependent children, regarded as a basic social unit (Abate and Jewell, The New Oxford American Dictionary). This definition has changed in both meaning and prevalence over time; it used to signify just a father, a mother, and their children, but now it’s become more inclusive to families who didn 't quite meet that description. Also, this set-up is far less common that it was, since rates of single parents have skyrocketed over the past 50 years (Tenenbaum, “Honor Thy Mother”). Despite this, the nuclear family is still the basic foundation of all familial relationships today. The novel Cold Sassy Tree by Olive Ann Burns is based on the lives (and deaths) of each member of a nuclear
I feel like as a whole, we are more accepting of different family units and lifestyles. While there will always be those who frown upon non-nuclear families, our society has adapted very well to the wide variety of lifestyles that exist with respect to family.
“In the 1950’s, 86 percent of children lived in two-parent families, and 60 percent of children were born into homes with a male breadwinner and a female homemaker” (Conley 451). In contrast, “in 1986, fewer than 10 percent of U.S. families consisted of a male breadwinner, a female housewife, and their children, a figure that has since fallen to 6 percent” (Conley 455). Modern families come in all shapes and sizes. They no longer follow the strict nuclear family layout. There are many reasons why the nuclear family is no longer the most common family type. Some of these reasons include increased divorces, increased acceptance of different sexual orientations, increased amount of couples choosing not to get married/common-law marriages, increased amount of people choosing not to have children (rise of birth control methods), increased amount of families with both parents working/needing to work, etc. Personally, I do not believe the decrease in the nuclear family model is a bad thing. By definition a family is just a group of people who are related or married/in a relationship and it can still be a healthy and well-functioning unit no matter the size or combination of people it is made up
Families have changed greatly over the past 60 years, and they continue to become more diverse.
Traditional family in today’s society is rather a fantasy, a fairy tale without the happy ending. Everyone belongs to a family, but the ideology that the family is built around is the tell tale. Family structures have undeniably changed, moving away from the conventional family model. Nowadays more mothers work outside of the home, more fathers are asked to help with housework, and more women are choosing to have children solo. Today there are families that have a mom and a dad living in the same home, there are step-families, and families that have just a mother or just a father. Probably the most scrutinized could be families that consist of two moms or two dads. These are all examples of families and if all members are appropriately happy and healthy then these families are okay and should incontestably be accepted. So why is the fantasy of the traditional family model still so emphasized in our society? This expectation is degrading and misleading. Progressing with times one ought not be criticized or shunned for being true to their beliefs. It is those living falsely, living as society thinks they should that are the problem. Perhaps as a society, if there were more focus and concern for happiness and peace within ones family and fewer worries for the neighbor then there would be less dilemma.
Cormac McCarthy’s post-apocalyptic novel The Road displays different concepts of nuclear and non-nuclear families throughout the novel. In The Road the reader is introduced to different types of individuals and non-nuclear families and how they succeed in a post-apocalyptic world. Nuclear families are what many consider to be a traditional family, consisting of a mother, father, and children while non-nuclear families are families that are considered untraditional. However, when a traditional family is introduced the reader sees the failures of nuclear families rather than their success while non-nuclear families appear to be more likely to succeed in the sense of survival. Incidents
As a primary institution, it carries with it the responsibility as an agent of socialization that possess the responsibility in ensuring social stability, implementing a set of family values, as well as playing a direct role in child rearing. When employing this perspective to the nuclear family, it allows us to examine how each individual within this family form is socialized with the notion of gender roles. The nuclear family ideology assigned different roles to men and women based on gendered lines. Placing focus on the way in each individual is given a gender role; the nuclear family displays the same characteristics as the process of socialization as it too causes a distinction of a male and female role within the family
Coming to an understanding of divorce is technically challenging and very emotional. Sociologists examine the macro-level of families to develop different theoretical aspects of divorced families. The structure of families in America today have revolutionized and created diversity within a family due to divorce. How has divorce redefined family composition? Many have different judgment, attitude, and knowledge that will put constraints in how a person will answer this question. Two different people would say divorce has either positively or negatively redefined family composition. However, a neutral person would just accept the fact that it has changed and redefined family arrangements.
These are the Functionalist, Conflict, and Interactionist Perspectives. Each perspective views society in different manners, with each being correct and relevant since social institutions are too complex to be defined by any one theory. Each perspective will be used to explain the perspectives’ relevance to the family. The sociological definition of the family is “a set of people related by blood, marriage or some other agreed-upon relationship, or adoption, who share the primary responsibility for reproduction and caring for members of society” (Schaeffer, 2009, p. 288). While the nuclear family (a man, a woman, and their children) was once the primary definition of family, now it refers to many familial configurations.
The Decline of Traditional Family Being Detrimental to Society Some people believe that the decline of the traditional family (Nuclear family) is detrimental to society because a lot of people are not socialising. This is one of the basic roles that a traditional family performs for individuals to meet the expectations of society. Only through a family can a person play a full part in society. In addition, society cannot exist without the rules and expectations of individual behaviour.
The Canadian situation mirrors England's situation. On Nov. 26, 2001, the Telegraph revealed that government statistics show that the number of cohabiting couples in England and Wales has reached more than 1.5 million, with four in 10 children now born outside marriage, compared with one in 10 in the 1970s. The number of couples living together is expected to double over the next 20 years.
Families play an important role in shaping individuals and through them it also shapes the whole society. But what does the term traditional family mean and who decides what constitutes a traditional family? According to Merriam-Webster (2011), the definition of a nuclear or traditional family means “a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children”.
It was thought it would decrease welfare, illness, deprivation and crime and make society stronger. The nuclear family would create more socialisation; act as role models and increase
George Murdock’s classic study provides the focus for my work; the nuclear family performs four basic functions in all societies. Which he turned the sexual, reproductive, economical and education. He describes the family as a social group characterised by common residence, economic co- operation and reproduction. It includes an adult of each sex, who maintain a socially approves sexual relationship and one or more children of the sexually cohabitating adults. Therefore from this definition it is clear that ‘fatherless families’ which exist in today’s society are not considered from a functionalist perspective as normal.