A nuclear power plant should not be built in New York City due to the many reasons stated. A nuclear power plant proves to be more harmful than beneficial as history, science, statistics and philosophy has proved. The radiation from a nuclear power plant, whether it is in high or low dosages are proved to have detrimental effects towards inhabitants. The process of getting the uranium to fuel the nuclear reactor is also deemed dangerous due to the ability of the workers to become sick because of the radon gas. Many nuclear reactors are being built around the world and it is important to know of the harmful effects it poses before it is built.
This use of doublespeak is misleading to the public and may make them believe that a major accident hasn't happened, or the accident was a normal event or minor incident. In 1979 a valve in the Three Mile Island stuck open, allowing coolant, an important part of the plant, to escape from the reactor. An installed emergency system did its job and supplied the reactor with necessary coolant, but the system was shot off for a few hours due to employee error. Corrective action was eventually taken, and only a partial meltdown occurred. The plant's containment building was able to hold most of the radioactive products from entering the local environment.
The more nuclear power plants are built, the higher is the probability of a disastrous failure somewhere in the world. Nuclear power plants as well as nuclear waste could be preferred targets for terrorist attacks. Nevertheless, our textbooks showed us and most of us remember that terrible event in Japan. The March 2011 earthquake and tsunami that triggered a catastrophe at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear complex has reignited debates over the role and safety ... ... middle of paper ... ...p onto an already unspeakable tragedy. The explosions and the threat of a radiation leak are troubling, and Japanese engineers and scientists are doing everything humanly possible to contain the situation.
This undertaking embodies the most important step in eradicating nuclear hazard at the site - and the actual start of decommissioning. The New Safe Containment will enable remote handling of these hazardous materials, using as limited personnel as possible (World Nuclear Association, 2012). The town of Chernobyl and the surrounding areas are said to be uninhabitable for a range of 120 to 180 years. Is the energy gained from nuclear power worth risking our communities and ruining the environment for 180 years? In my opinion, I would argue that no matter what precautions are taken, the risk would be too great.
Now in our modern society we have a big need for energy and are trying to find alternative types of energy power plants. Nuclear power plants are used in more than 30 countries all around the world (World nuclear association, n.d. para.3). These power plants are able to generate electricity continuously for many months at a time without interruption (World nuclear association, n.d.para.2). Nuclear power plants produce electricity by going through the process of fission. They have pros and cons as well, they can bring more jobs helping out the economy but also the radiation waste that is given off of the plants can harm many people’s health.
The ocean can not accommodate dumpings without being permanently damaged. Furthermore, the immense technological revolution of the last century has increased society's ability to cause greater damage to the world's oceans. Nuclear Industry The development of nuclear industry has been a cornerstone for the world's technological revolution. Since the discovery of fission more than a half century ago, nuclear power has become a major source of the world's electricity supply. By 1989, 416 nuclear power plants were in operation, thus providing approximately seventeen percent of the world's electricity (Waczewski, 1997).
The truth is that accidents do happen at nuclear power plants and at other facilities all the time . An accident at a nuclear power plant has the potential to be much more devastating than an accident at a coal or gas plant because of the radiation that could be released . An example of this is Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania where there was a partial core meltdown in march of 1979 and an "acceptable" amount of radiation escaped into the atmosphere . However no amount of radiation is acceptable if released as a result of an accident at a nuclear power plant . Is Nuclear Power necessary ?
Those who build nuclear power plants without worrying about the waste wager the habitability of the planet ( Spaemann ). For more than fifty years, waste piles from nuclear power plants formed waste mountain that were dangerous to the world. According to the World Nuclear Association, twelve thousand tons of highly radioactive waste are created each year. By the end of 2010, about three hundred thousand tons of highly radioactive waste existed worldwide. In Europe, there are 280 m^3 more waste in interim storage than the year before.
Should Nuclear Waste Be Stored in Yucca Mountain? Nuclear waste is the radioactive material that results from using nuclear reactors that can remain radioactive for over 100,000 years, until it decays. Since the radioactive nuclear waste is dangerously radioactive, the government has been debating on a place to permanently store nuclear waste for over 30 years so they could keep the US safe from some of the horrible effects of high radiation. One of the areas that is most likely to be used as a place to dispose of nuclear waste is Yucca Mountain, in Nevada, although there are many people who detest the storing of nuclear waste in Nevada. Nuclear waste should not be stored in Yucca Mountain because of the various risks associated with storing nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain.
Those that don’t have economical energy are at a disadvantage in an increasingly globalized economy. The ongoing Japanese nuclear crisis underscores yet again the risks inherent in this essential energy source. But it should not divert nations from using or pursuing nuclear power to generate electricity, given the threat from climate change, the health hazards of fossil fuels, and the undeveloped state of renewable energy. Instead, the events at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant should turn more attention to ensuring that nuclear power plants meet the highest standards of safety and protection against natural disasters. More than 30 nations have commercial nuclear power plants.