The No Child Left Behind Act: Imperfect Legislation

2252 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: No child left behind negative effects

Through the years there have been many pushes for better education and each time new laws are implemented. Many of the old laws have been updated with improvements. These new laws are given a new name. The “No Child Left Behind” Act has given everyone a new approach to education while implementing many new stipulations and regulations.

Schools have been classified as failing many times in the past and the government has made a goal to try and improve the education system in each instance. "No Child Left Behind" Act, when implemented, was a repeat of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (Background & Analysis). The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was “ the major federal law authorizing federal spending on programs to support K-12 schooling,” with the primary goal “to improve educational equity for students from lower income families by providing federal funds to school districts serving poor students,” (Background & Analysis). It, Also, Strengthened Title 1, “the program targeting billions of federal dollars to education for the poor children,” (Testing: No CHild Left Behind). The "No Child Left Behind" Act was “designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools,” (Archived: Introduction: No Child Left Behind). In essence, according to the U.S. Department of Education in 2001, the "No Child Left Behind" Act was designed to create broad leaps in improvement in the achievement of students and force more accountability on the schools and states for students’ progress (No Child Left Behind). Originally, the act was meant to be a “sweeping education law” determined to improve public schools (Testing: No Child Left Behind).

"No Child Left Behind" Act was ...

... middle of paper ...

...ind/>.

"Testing: No Child Left Behind." PBS. PBS, 5 Sept. 2008. Web. 23 Jan. 2015. .

Whitney, Suzanne. "No Child Left Behind - What Teachers, Principals and Administrators Need to Know About NCLB by Suzanne Whitney - Wrightslaw." Wrightslaw. Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright, n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2015. .

George W. Bush on Education

“H.R. 1--107th Congress: No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.” www.GovTrack.us. 2001. January 30, 2015.

"Standards and Assessment." NCLB Action Briefs. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Jan. 2015. .

Show More
Related

  • Manifest and Latent Functions of the The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001’s main purpose was to enhance the education system and hold schools accountable in its attempt to bring equality in the fight against poverty for poor and minority groups. Once this Act was signed into law the American public expected an overhaul of the education system with only good outcomes. The public assumed our children would be receiving the best education available and the economic issues that plagued schools would no longer be a problem. In the beginning of its implementation No Child Left Behind was expected to bring America up to standards with other nations, this was something that America has struggled to do for many years. Our children were now being put first according to Act and the public and many political figures were ecstatic over the possibilities.

    Read More

  • The Death And Life Of The Great American School System By Diane Ravitch

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    The implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act applied a market approach to school reform as a way of improving the school system. This new law promised an era of high standards, testing, and accountability in

    Read More

  • Standardized Testing Has a Negative Effect on American Youth

    1129 Words  | 3 Pages

    Neill, Monty. "The No Child Left Behind Act Is Not Improving Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 162-68. Print.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of No Child Left Behind

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another major criticism of the “No Child Left Behind” deals with the implications of using a standardized test as means of assessing achievement.

    Read More

  • Analyzing the No Child Left Behind Act

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    No Child Left Behind is the 21st-century recognition of this first major federal venture into education policies an area that is still mainly a state and local function, as visualized by our Founding Fathers. On January 8, 2002, President George W. Bush signed into law the No Child Left Behind Act.

    Read More

  • No Child Left Behind: An Analysis of U.S Educational Policy

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is currently the educational policy in the United States. Prior to NCLB the educational policies in effect were “A Nation at Risk, in 1987 America 2000, and a few years later with Goals 2000” (Eisner, 2001, p.21). No Child Left Behind is a test based accountability system used in schools to measure their performance holding the districts, administrators and teachers liable and accountable for the outcomes. Supovitz (2009) States that No Child Left Behind was a major reform initiative intended to bring about widespread improvements in student performance and reduce inequities between ethnic groups and other traditionally under-served populations like economically disadvantaged students, students from major racial

    Read More

  • No Child Left Behind Will Reform Our Educational System

    1746 Words  | 4 Pages

    Just three days after taking office in January of 2001 as the forty third president of the United States, George W. Bush announced his plan of No Child Left Behind. Signed January 8, 2002, it was the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the central federal law in pre-collegiate education. (Rebora) No Child Left Behind cleared Congress in a landslide with overwhelming majorities. (Seligman) It was said to be the most ambitious school reform effort in at least a generation. (Symonds) No Child Left Behind, is a landmark in education reform, designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools. Bush describes his plan as 'the cornerstone of my administration' (Rebora).

    Read More

  • The Debate Over the No Child Left Behind Act

    1030 Words  | 3 Pages

    The current debates surrounding the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 are both positive and negative. Many politicians and people that previously supported the Act are now standing against it. In the beginning many supported the new Act because everyone was aware that a change needed to happen in the education system and the proposal of No Child Left Behind seemed like the answer we were looking for. As the No Child Left Behind requirements began to be felt in the school systems across America and the assessments results started coming in, everyone took a step back and really began to look at the new law. The results were not what everyone expected, what was once considered an answer was now becoming the problem.

    Read More

  • Standardized Tests: Do They Really Work for Raising the Rank of the US in World Education?

    1813 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 2002, President George W. Bush passed the “No Child Left Behind Act” which tied in schools’ public funding to standardized tests and enforced the tests in elementary and high schools every year by state education departments. This law also began to put more emphasize on standardized tests which has diminished our level of education and the law “made standardized test scores the primary measure of school quality” (Diane Ravitch 28). Bush hoped this law motivated more students to do well on these exams and teachers to help them prepare better, but it ended up hurting many schools in the process. These exams like the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) should not play such a prominent role in schooling and the government should not make tests the main focal point.

    Read More

  • No Child Left Behind

    1047 Words  | 3 Pages

    Maleyko, Glenn, and Marytza A. Gawlik. "No Child Left Behind: What We Know And What We Need To Know." Education 131.3 (2011): 600-624. Academic Search Elite. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.

    Read More

  • No Child Left Behind

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    As students in a Structure & Philosophy class, one of the main components has been to introduce and familiarize us with the No Child Left Behind Act. President Bush passed this legislation on January 8, 2002. The NCLB Act was designed to ensure each and every student the right to a fair education, to give parents more options in their child’s education, and to guarantee all teachers are highly qualified. By highly qualified, the act means teachers must have at least a bachelor’s degree, have full state certification or licensure, and have demonstrated competence in their subject areas (US Dept. of Education).

    Read More

  • How important is Education to the Economy and Where Are the Funds for Education Going?

    1844 Words  | 4 Pages

    Lee, Oliver. "Does No Child Left Behind Deserve a Passing Grade?" TakePart. N.p., 6 June 2012. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.

    Read More

  • No Child Left Behind Act

    372 Words  | 1 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act, a federal social program that tries to encourages after school programs should be eliminated and the extra funds given to schools to decide where it goes.

    Read More

  • A Significant Issue in Education: Teacher BIAS

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    U.S. Department of Education. (2006). No Child Left Behind executive summary report. Retrieved September 14, 2006 from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm.html

    Read More

  • The Role of Testing and Assessment in Early Childhood Education

    1763 Words  | 4 Pages

    Stipek, D. (2006). No child left behind comes to preschool. The Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 455-466.

    Read More

More about The No Child Left Behind Act: Imperfect Legislation

Open Document