Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How have women changed in literature
The role of women in literature
The role of women in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How have women changed in literature
What is a New Woman and what did it mean during the Victorian period for a woman to consider herself as one? The New Woman during the Victorian age is described in “Manliness and masculinities” as being asserted and rejecting protection from man and refusing to live her life according to patriarchal rules. (Tosh 118) Sue appears to fit in with the description of the new women; she in actuality does not have all the qualities of one. She has education, and works for her own living but depended on Phillotson and Jude instead of being independent and solving her problems by herself she runs to either men looking for comfort.
When she attempts to be express herself as independent and in control of her life she act the way that most women were supposed to act according to society. Society says that they are supposed to be impulsive and emotional, that was how Sue was when she did not obey authority. Hardy demonstrates Sue’s attempts to be the new type of woman and fails to be perceived as one after she buys two nude figures; right after she bought the nude figures she thought they were treasures, but soon begins to wish she had not bought the figures for they seemed “very large and so very naked” and starts to shake and grow very nervous after buying them. (Hardy 92-93) She becomes nervous because she focuses on what the authority in her household will say about the sculptures, when she should not be worried about the opinions of those around her. Though, Jude does portray her as being the new woman a she wanted to be.
Jude once described her as, “believing that she was [you are] as innocent as she was [you are] unconventional. (Hardy 145) She seems to have a different view on certain aspects of life, compared to other woman becaus...
... middle of paper ...
...s controlled by society and her husband, even though she does make the decision herself she is giving the man the authority and responsibility over herself and her actions.
Works Cited
Hardy, Thomas. Jude the Obscure. New York: New American Library, 2009.Print
Milgram, Stanley. “The Perils of Obedience.” The New Millenium Reader. 4th ed. Ed. Stuart Hirschberg and Terry Hirschberg. New York: Prentice Hall, 2005: 653-663. Print.
Pinker, Steven. “The Moral Instinct.” The Norton Reader. 13th ed. Ed. Nancy Peterson, et al. New York: W.W.Norton, 2012: 321-328. Print.
Tosh. John. Manliness and Masculinities in Nineteenth-Century Britain. London: Pearson
Longman, 2005. Print.
Wheelwright, Phillip. "The Meaning of Ethics." The New Millennium Reader. 4th ed. Ed Stuart
Hirschberg and Terry Hirschberg. New York: Prentice Hall, 2005: 629-633. Print.
Principles of Morality. Seattle: Ponster Printing, pp. 89-92. 2010. Print. The. Gevinson, Matilda.
...he shows us her character, not by how she gives herself respect, but by the continued respect that she gives to others: even her tormenters. Her secret shame was kept inside, and it was an impossible burden to bear. She was brave.
Overvold, Mark C. "Morality, Self-Interest, and Reasons for Being Moral." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44.4 (1984): 493-507. JSTOR. Web. 6 Mar. 2014.
Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S., & Bebeau, M. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644-659.
Margaret R.,DeCosse, David, Andre, Claire, & Hanson Markkula, Kirk O. (1988). Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University. Issues in Ethics, V. 1, N. 2. Sobel, Russell S. &
Rachels, James, and Stuart Rachels. "7,8,9,10." In The elements of moral philosophy. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010. 97-145.
Westermack, Edward A (1906-8): The origins and development of the Moral Ideas, 2 vols., London: MacMillan & Co.
As the years dragged on in the new nation the roles of men and women became more distinct and further apart for one another. Women were not allowed to go anywhere in public without an escort, they could not hold a position in office let allow vote, and they could only learn the basics of education (reading, writing, and arithmetic). In law the children belonged to the husband and so did the wife’s property and money. The only job women could think about having was being a ‘governess’ which would give other women education.
Joyce, Richard. "The Myth of Morality." Foundations of Ethics. Ed. Russ Shafer-Landau and Terence Cuneo. Malden: Blackwell, 2007. 23-34. Print.
(Jensen, 2005, p. 69) could be compared with the importance of desired moral reasoning. The
As the story progresses Jane is slowly but surely transforming into a new woman. From the beginning, Jane has always possessed a sense of her dignity. Jane integrity is constantly tested over the progression of the novel, and Jane must learn to balance the repeated conflicting parts of her in order to find contentment. During this era in England, women are viewed differently than they are today. In the 19th century women in England were expected to maintain a certain image or act in a certain manner which is referred to as the traditional woman who accepts her role in society. Men are the dominant ones in the society. Although women are expected to be a traditional woman, not all of them follow play the part. This is a woman who does not live by the standards of the society. A new woman does not sit back and do as she is told; she makes her own rules and determines her own success. These are all characteristics that Jane starts to gain.
Rosenstand, Nina. The Moral of the Story: An Introduction to Ethics, 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill Higher Education/CourseSmart, 2008. 241. Online book.
Boylan, M. (2009). Basic ethics: Basic ethics in action (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Boss, J. A. (2014). Ethics for Life (Sixth ed., pp. 252-255). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Johnson, Robert, Johnson,. "Kant's Moral Philosophy." Stanford University. Stanford University, 23 Feb. 2004. Web. 27 Nov. 2013.