Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
canada versus united states healthcare coverage
negative impacts of obamacare
canada versus united states healthcare coverage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: canada versus united states healthcare coverage
The new cancer drug ought to be distributed through the Obamanos Plan, however, the government should pay for a portion of the cancer treatment through taxes. Before examining why the Obamanos plan would be the most effective and morally right, let investigate through a libertarian conception of rights why health care is not a right in first instance. This explanation would provide a basis as to the reason behind the decision to choose the Obamanos Plan and why the Canadian and Brit Plan are both morally impermissible and a clear violation of the rights bestow upon us as humans.
“Because individuals are moral agents, they have a right to be secure in their life, liberty, and property. These rights are not granted by government or by society; they are inherent in the nature of human beings. It is intuitively right that individuals enjoy the security of such rights; the burden of explanation should lie with those who would take rights away” (David 1). Libertarian argue that health care as a right is a violation of our natural right, more specifically it is a violation of the individual’s right and property (Norman 2). Providing healthcare to everyone takes away our freedom of choice. Libertarians do not believe in positive rights stating that it is not others duty to provide someone with either a good or service (Norman 2). No member of society has a right to demand a minimal share of basic goods from that society (Norman 2). However, people have the right to not have their rights interfered with (Norman 2). If one does argue that healthcare should be a right at what point should the care provided be cut off? A cut off point cannot be determined because everyone has different definition of what basic healthcare rights should be p...
... middle of paper ...
... If the plan is going to tax everyone and take a part of everyone’s income, it must also provide the new cancer treatment to everyone. It is immoral to take taxes from everyone and then choose what specific service to provide. This also explain why this plan is ineffective and unbeneficial because everyone is paying taxes but only a select group of people (wealthy) would be receiving the new cancer treatment. The plan is not benefiting those cancer patients who are forced to pay an increase in taxes but are still forced to use the conventional treatment.
Works Cited
Boaz, David . "Key Concepts of Libertarianism." Cato Institute. N.p., 1 Jan. 1999. Web. 14 Mar.
2014. .
Daniels, Norman (2009). “Is there a right to health care and, if so, what does it encompass?”
Mar. 2014
One of the most controversial topics in the United States in recent years has been the route which should be undertaken in overhauling the healthcare system for the millions of Americans who are currently uninsured. It is important to note that the goal of the Affordable Care Act is to make healthcare affordable; it provides low-cost, government-subsidized insurance options through the State Health Insurance Marketplace (Amadeo 1). Our current president, Barack Obama, made it one of his goals to bring healthcare to all Americans through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. This plan, which has been termed “Obamacare”, has come under scrutiny from many Americans, but has also received a large amount of support in turn for a variety of reasons. Some of these reasons include a decrease in insurance discrimination on the basis of health or gender and affordable healthcare coverage for the millions of uninsured. The opposition to this act has cited increased costs and debt accumulation, a reduction in employer healthcare coverage options, as well as a penalization of those already using private healthcare insurance.
Cancer is a disease in which cells multiply out of control and gradually build a mass of tissue called a tumor. There has been a large amount of research dedicated to the treatment and cure of cancer. Several types of treatments have been developed. The following are just some of the major examples of cancer therapy: surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, biologic therapy, biorhythms, unconventional treatments, and hyperthermia. Each type of treatment is discussed in detail below.
...oral responsibility to our communities and our fellow citizens. We can’t in good conscience stand by as millions of our neighbors are denied to basic health care. Nearly 1,500 public events were taken place in all fifty states and the District of Columbia to bring commonly community leaders to retain that all Americans have rights to health care coverage. “For far too many years, our nation has not lived up to its full potential by delaying the day when all Americans will have health care coverage.” (Suffer Health Care Gaps as a Result) Health care is a right, not a privilege.
Our healthcare system has developed into a burden for most people and has terrible consequences for others. It consists of everyone paying for healthcare as a whole, instead of people paying for themselves. This system of healthcare has burdened the people who take care of themselves and have money, but extends the life of people who do not take care of themselves and live in poverty. This is not pleasant for the one’s who decided to go to school and make well over minimum wage. In turn, they are the individuals who end up paying for the people who decided to make bad decisions in their life that put them in the minimum wage position. Clearly, laws regulate the insurance companies but these regulations do not make any sense to many. Balko explains that, “More and m...
Bybee, Roger. “Can We Have Universal Health Care?” Dissent 2 (2009): 63. eLibrary. Web. 04 Nov. 2013.
Governing bodies for the prevention, treatment, and management of illnesses in America are now in a commotion because of the cost of care and patient access and the need for a more efficient system. There are approximately 50 or more million people currently in The United States that are without insurance today. In March of 2010 a country wide health care charge called The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was passed, that seemed to offer solutions to some of the major issues facing our health care system. June of 2012, this new health care law or tax was challenged in the U. S. Supreme Court on the Constitutionality of the bill with proponents wanted the Act repealed. A few weeks later the Supreme Court gave its answer, which was the law or tax is Constitutional and upheld it as tax. One of the biggest issues to this Act was the part where all Americans have to be insured by someone or be penalized, but the final analysis of this...
Wear, Stephen. "Sense and Nonsense in the Conservative Critique of ObamaCare." The American Journal Of Bioethics: AJOB 11.12 (2011): 17-20. Print
Heath care is currently, and has been, a hot topic in politics and the average person's life today. Since Obama has come into office he has brought up the issue of providing every American with health care coverage while keeping costs low. Since his re-election, we have been faced with a healthcare reform that tears our country, and politicians, down the middle. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare,” is “A federal statute signed into law in March 2010 as a part of the healthcare reform agenda of the Obama administration. Signed under the title of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the law included multiple provisions that would take effect over a matter of years, including the expansion of Medicaid eligibility, the establishment of health insurance exchanges and prohibiting health insurers from denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions” (Affordable Care Act). The reform is meant to help those who cannot cover the costs of coverage due to low income, or no jobs, as well as those who have been denied because of pre-existing heath conditions; it is essentially there to help those ultimately in need. Unfortunately, Obamacare is not beneficial to those who are currently covered, typically known as the average American, as it it is not cost effective nor constitutional.
America is known for democracy, freedom, and the American Dream. American citizens have the right to free speech, free press, the right to bear arms, and the right to religious freedom to name a few. The Declaration of Independence states that American citizens have the rights including “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” America promises equality and freedom and the protection of their rights as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. But with all the rights and freedoms that American citizens enjoy, there is one particular area where the United States seems to be lacking. That area is health care. The United States is the only industrialized nation that doesn’t have some form of legal recognition of a right to health care (Yamin 1157). Health care reform in the United States has become a major controversy for politicians, health care professionals, businesses, and citizens. Those in opposition to reform claim that health care is not a human right, therefore the government should not be involved. Supporters of reform believe that health care is most definitely a human right and should be available to everyone in the United States instead of only those who can afford it, and that it is the government’s responsibility to uphold that right.
Vallentyne, Peter, and Bas van der Vossen. “Libertarianism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 5 Sept. 2002,
Farmer, Paul, and Nicole Gastineau. 2002. Rethinking Health and Human Rights: Time for a Paradigm Shift.
I find that Rawls’ Contract Theory and the “fair equality of opportunity” principle provide a convincing and logical argument for Daniels’ stance on the distribution of health care. On the other hand, for a utilitarian or a natural law theorist Daniels’ logic is contradicting nonetheless. Yet, it is still feasible for either of these theorists to support Daniels’ claim to the distribution of adequate health care to everyone. Despite my contradiction to Daniels’ logic leading to his claim, I concur to the societal right to adequate health
health care, only those who are “privileged” enough to afford health care can receive it. So is this what health care in the United States is and should be?Arnold Schwarzenegger the former Governor of California stated “Health care is not a right, but its cause is a government interference in the healthcare system. The solution is to leave doctors, patients and insurance companies free to deal with each other on whatever terms they choose, not to socialize American medicine” (Russo). Schwarzenegger then went on about how this would cost the government too much money and that this is not the answer to the healthcare improvement (Russo). Sen. Shelia Keuhl, the senator that wrote the bill stated in a press release “It’s important to understand that vetoes of health reform legislation have very serious consequences […] Because of these vetoes, there will continue to be very little regulation of the runaway health insurance market and no protections for consumers”
The question at hand was is healthcare a right or a privilege, reviewing all facts, and data given you will see Health Care in the United States is a privilege. It seems very vile to have resources, and services to deny a person whom has a curable illness or disease, because they don’t have proper health care. However this is the society we live in where liberty and justice for all comes before healthcare for all.
It should guarantee a system of health protection. Which also means that everyone has the right to health care. For example, according to Forbes, a young boy named Deandre who was 7, died of a toothache because he did not get good treatment because his health care was not good. He was on Medicaid, America’s government-run health care program for the poor, so he never received proper dental care. The US should care for their people, and people who don’t make a lot of money, have poor healthcare. This story shows why the US should have better access to health care because of not doing so, more can die from having poor health care and not getting treatment fast or good. Many doctors do not treat people on Medicaid because it does not pay enough for them to treat people and many choose not to or wait long months just to get a patient’s appointment. According to Frances Robles a writer from The New York Times, in Florida, where