Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history of accounting
Need for regulation in the context of financial reporting
The history of accounting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The history of accounting
The Need for Regulation in Financial Reporting
Discuss:
Since 1990 the Accounting Standards Board has produced Financial
Reporting Standards (FRSs) It has been performing a very important
role in the economics market as the published accounts are the
essential sources of information about the organizationsÂ’ performance
which is available of the both internal and external user group in
large organizations.
l Financial Reporting Regulations in UK
Regulators that establish requirements for the reporting of financial
results have recently issued several new initiatives targeted at the
practices of many firms. The creation of regulations for financial
reporting in the UK combine both legislative authority and the work of
private organizations. The issuing organizations and their
responsibilities are discussed below and represented in Table 1. The
UK Companies Act of 1985, and amended in 1989, requires firms to
provide financial statements that comply with 'accounting standards'
and disclose any departures from those standards along with the
accompanying reasons. Departures should only be made when they are
necessary to provide a 'true and fair view' of the underlying
transactions of the firm. In 1990, a system for developing standards
was created which included an independent standard-setting board and
an oversight board, the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) and the
Financial Reporting Council (FRC), respectively. Similar to the US
structure, the ASB also has a separate branch that targets the most
recent accounting concerns called the Urgent Issues Task Force (UITF).
The financial reporting regulations set by the ASB extends to all
limited liability companies, not just those that are publicly traded.
Enforcement of accounting regulation in the UK is governed by the
FRC's Financial Reporting Review Panel and the Department of Trade and
Industry. The Review Panel is empowered by the Companies Act to go to
the courts to have a firm revise its financial reports, if necessary.
United Kingdom
Legislative authority to regulate accounting standards
Companies Act of 1985, amended by Companies Act of 1989
Private, independent standard-setting board
Accounting Standards Board (ASB) guided by the Financial Reporting
Council (FRC)
Division of standard-setting board charged with addressing current
topics
Urgent I...
... middle of paper ...
...r
the period are from cash sales. Both the EITF and UITF call for
disclosure in the notes to the financial statements of barter
transactions recorded in current revenues and other barter
transactions that were not recorded. Therefore, fewer barter
transactions can be recorded as revenues and investors must be clearly
informed about the barter transactions.
l Other sources of regulation in the UK
Accounting standards together with the companies Acts 1985 and 1989
contain most of the regulations governing company financial reporting
in the UK. However, some companies must also comply with regulations
laid down in other legislation. Thus, companies must comply with the
accounting requirements set out in the International Stock ExchangeÂ’s
Continuing Obligations in order to help their shares to be listed on
the International Stock Exchange of the UK and Republic of Ireland,
Summary
=======
From all the above , we can see that the importance of the regulations
of finance reporting and it has be consummating constantly as
required.
Bibliography:
www.gsk.org
Financial Accounting Second Edition (John Arnold, Tony Hope, Alan
South Worth, Linda Kirkham)
Damages in the United States include two categories. Compensatory damages are intended to compensate for the plaintiff’s loss. Punitive damages, on the contrary, are meant to punish the defendant .The punitive damages exceed the plaintiff’s loss, to dissuade the defendant from any further wrongdoings. For instance, having a company pay significant punitive damages may encourage it to greater caution. Another difference between the two categories is the money involved. If the damages are compensatory, the money usually goes entirely to the plaintiff, but if they are punitive, part of the money goes to the law firm and part to the plaintiff.
If a breach of contract is both material and opportunistic, the injured promisee has a claim in restitution to the profit realized by the defaulting promisor as a result of the breach. Liability in restitution with disgorgement of profit is an alternative to liability for contract damages measured by injury to the promisee.
The Enrons and Worldcoms made it clear that the financial markets cannot be left under the auspices of corporate directors and officers, without oversight authority. "The corporate abuses and fraud that Enron exemplified, while not a first in the financial markets, they were certainly a first in terms of the magnitude of the losses to stockholders and the confidence the public reposed in the financial sector (Bequai 2003)." As a result of the stock market crash of 1929 regulations such as the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 were established to prevent such practices as those that contributed to the downfalls of Enron and Worldcom.
In the chapter, criminal law has been well organized by dividing it into misdemeanors and felonies and both have been explained into detail. Misdemeanors refer to offenses that are less serious and the offenders serve time for a year or less in local jails while felonies refer to serious crimes such as rape and murder and
The root of Felon Disenfranchisement can be traced back to Greek and Roman laws. Where any person convicted of an infamous crime would lose his or her right to participate in polis. In Rome they would lose their right to participate in suffrage and to serve in the Roman legions. With the founding of the United States of America, the US Constitution gave the right to establish voting laws to the states. From 1776 - 1821 eleven states included felony disenfranchisement in their laws (Voter Registration Protection Act). By 1868 when the fourteenth Amendment was enacted eighteen states had adopted disenfranchisement laws. After the Civil War felony Disenfranchisement laws were used along with poll taxes and literary test to exclude African Americans from voting. The right to vote is considered to be one of the fundamental rights of citizenship in the United States. This right is more than just the right to mark a piece of paper and drop it in a box or the right to pull a lever in a voting booth. The right to vote includes the right to have a ballot counted for as a legal voting citizen. Although this right is considered fundamental, restrictions have been placed on this right. The main restriction is placed on persons convicted of a felony conviction all felonies not just infamous ones. Today on Election Day, as Americans wait in line to cast their vote over 4.65 million people are denied this most fundamental democratic right because of a past or present felony conviction.
Misdemeanors are crimes that are typically punishable by no more than one year of local county jail time and have no more than a $1,000 fine. Misdemeanors can range from very minor to very severe. Misdemeanors are less severe Crimes that are considered misdemeanors include DUI’s, petty theft, driving with a suspended license, vandalism, prostitution, possession of drugs, not allowing an officer to search or inspect, failure to stop if law enforcement is trying to pull you over, refusing to show your license to a police officer, causing injury with a motor vehicle when driving with a suspended or revoked license, hit and run, driving in the wrong direction, drag racing, throwing an object at another vehicle on a freeway, failing to install a court ordered ignition interlock device within the 30 day grace period, and reckless driving. Misdemeanors typically proceed with an arrest, an arraignment, a pretrial and then a court or jury trial. During the arrest stage you will be taken to jail. The jail will do one of three things, either you will be let out of jail with no charges fil...
Felony disenfranchisement is legally revoking citizens, who have been imprisoned for felony charges, of their right to vote. States are currently allowed, by law, to forbid felons from voting. In thirty-eight states, including the District of Columbia, felons’ rights to vote are restored immediately after they have completed their sentences and probational consequences (“Felony Voting Rights”). In other states, ex-cons must go through a process to get their voting rights back, which they have to apply for (“Felony Voting Rights”). Felony disenfranchisement is another way for our government to discriminate racially because African-American males are statistically the most affected by this law. I have numerous statists and a personal story from
A tort is wrongful interference against a person or property, other than breaches of contract, for which the courts can rectify through legal action. The reform effort is aimed at reducing the number of unnecessary lawsuits that burden the court system while still allowing injured parties compensation when they’ve been wronged. This latest effort at tort reform has given rise to the same spirited rhetoric that might be found in a courtroom.
after suffering harm from the acts of the other party (Turner, 2013). A tort is a civil wrong
The New Zealand (NZ) Framework for Financial Reporting is in the process of changing since 2009, as a result of the review of the statutory reporting requirements in New Zealand by Ministry of Economic Development (MED) and the Accounting Standard Review Board (ASRB). The mainly recommendation was to remove small and medium sized companies from the statutory reporting framework (Ernst & Young, 2013, p.11). This New Zealand Framework for Financial Reporting 2010 (NZ Framework) was issued by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board of the External Reporting Board (XRB) in 2011. The changes of framework pull open the NZ financial reporting standards that comprise NZ Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP) setting movement from ‘rule-based’ approach to ‘principle-based’ approach. Then comes to the question: Whether the application of NZ GAAP is supported positively by the NZ Framework with the appropriate underlying principles, or it preserved a largely ‘rule-driven’ approach? From my perspective, NZ Framework provides parts of applicable underlying principles in guidance of NZ GAAP but there are rooms for improvement.
Tort is a word developed to describe in general the different types of claims that are normally imposing economic and financial losses that are because of some kind of misbehavior, apart from breach of contract. The term is used to refer to this type of claims, false presentations, fraud, breach of contract, encouragement, unfair competition, trade name and trademark infringement and interference with business relationships (Emanuel, S.
Private and public accounting has long been discussed and disputed in regards to financial reporting. Since the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was created in 1973, accountants have called for different accounting regulations for private and public accounting sectors, as private companies do not have the resources to meet the complex requirements of public companies. Private companies currently are not required by law to issue annual or quarterly financial statements (James, 2012). Private companies do, however, have the option to apply the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), cash basis, or accrual accounting to their financial statements (James, 2012).
One of the most debatable topics in the accounting industry today is the extent in which we should make the financial statements understandable to the general population. The FASB currently gears its reporting standards toward...
Main view of this report is to explain how the accounting plays a major role in banking, finance and other sectors of business. To decide this, the following questions are explained as follows:
Legal crimes are an act that violates the law in itself but is considered legal given the situation. For example; killing someone in self defense violates the law, however; murder in itself is a crime, but protecting one's life if threatening by bodily harm or injury is legal. Therefore, killing in self defense is a legal crime. Legal crimes are acts that are not harmful to another person, however; these acts are defined as crimes by society because of the influence these crimes have on those who are in authority. Legal crimes are less serious because they cause less harm, are not as frequent and are not as widespread. People who commit assault, fraud, embezzlement, vandalism, prostitution, and disorderly conduct are committing legal crimes. Legal crimes are not an obvious crime and do not have an obvious victim. However, not all crimes are reported to the police, therefore crimes are classified by the degree of harm caused, how frequent they occur, and how pervasive the crimes are throughout the country. Crimes can be distinguished by degree or severity of the crime by dividing the crimes into groups; felonies for severe crime and misdemeanors for less severe crimes. Another way to distinguish crime is between mala in se which is rape or murder or mala prohibita, which is trespassing, gambling, or prostitution. Once the public understands that the balance is the goal of "justice" the next step is to understand the difference between a natural crime and a legal crime.