The Need for An Adequate Evaluation of Organization Behavior

1593 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Organizational theory and behavior

As organizations truly affect almost every aspect of our daily lives, it is vital for us to understand the what, how and why of organizations (Buchanan & Huczynski, 2010) . That is why an adequate evaluation of organizational behaviour is needed. This essay is going to analyse the application of a critical model of thinking to studying organizational behaviour. It is going to do so by first setting clear definitions of key terms, describing generally Taylorism, Fordism and Post-Fordism and then proceeding with analysis of different examples. These examples would relate to the above mentioned organizational behaviour theories and the relationships between them. As a result of the analysis a summary is to be drawn focusing on the value of applying an analytical method to understanding organizational behaviour. What makes this topic particularly interesting is that it relates an interdisciplinary field (Buchanan & Huczynski, 2010) of research with a concrete way of perception and then questions it. However, it must remain clear that the term “critical approach” in the sense of understanding organizational behaviour would mean the same thing as if a critical approach is applied within the field of study, that is an approach that challenges the status quo and does not ignore perspectives that are routinely ignored or excluded otherwise (Knights & Willmott, 2007) .

The first concept that is considered is Taylorism. Following by the name of Frederick Winslow Taylor the idea of scientific management theory is considered the basis of modern management (Buchanan & Huczynski, 2010) . Taylor had the opportunity to monitor production in the steel industry from first hand as he was an engineer. Because of the specifics of the industry, worker...

... middle of paper ...

...ons (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Hoopes, James. (2003). False prophets : the gurus who created modern management and why their ideas are bad for business today. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Pub.

Huczynski, Andrzej. (2007). Organizational behaviour : an introductory text (6th ed.). Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Knights, David, & Willmott, Hugh. (2007). Introducing organizational behaviour and management. London: Cengage.

Martin, John. (2001). Organizational Behaviour (2 ed.). Italy: G. Canale & C.

Morgan, Gareth. (2006). Images of organization (Updated ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Taylor, F. W. (2007). Scientific management. In Derek S. Pugh (Ed.), Organization Theory: Selected Classic Readings (5 ed., pp. 275-295). London: Penguin Books.

Weber, Max. (1957). The theory of social and economic organization. Glencoe, Ill.,: Free Press.

Show More
Related

  • Amazon´s Organizational Structure

    1273 Words  | 3 Pages

    Robbins, S. P., & Coulter. M. (2014). Management (12th ed.). Retrieved from: Colorado Technical University eBook Collection database.

    Read More

  • Case-study: WL Gore & Associates

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    Robbins , Stephen P. and Judge, Timothy, A. Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Prentice Hall. Pearson Custom Publishing. 2008 Print

    Read More

  • Trouble at City Zoo Case Study

    3705 Words  | 8 Pages

    Langton, Nancy, Stephen Robbins, and Timothy Judge.Organizational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies, Applications. Fifth Canadian Edition. Toronto: Pearson Canada, 2009. 141, 574-84. Print.

    Read More

  • Comparing Management Theories Of Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo And Douglas Mcgregor

    2062 Words  | 5 Pages

    Holloman, C. (1974), “What McGregor Really Said”, Business Horizons, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 17 Issue 6, p. 87 – 92. Karlöf, B. & Lövingsson, H. (2005), The A to Z of Management Concepts and Models, Thorogood, London. Kermally, S. (2005), Gurus in People Management, Thorogood, Sydney.

    Read More

  • Fordism is the Scientific Management for Contemporary Organizations

    1988 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fordism and Scientific Management are terms used to describe management that had application to practical situations with extremely dramatic effects. Fordism takes its name from the mass production units of Henry Ford, and is identified by an involved technical division of labour within companies and their production units. Other characteristics of Fordism include strong hierarchical control, with workers in a production line often restricted to the one single task, usually specialised and unskilled. Scientific management, on the other hand, "originated" through Fredrick Winslow Taylor in 1911, and in very basic terms described the one best way work could be done and that the best way to improve output was to improve the techniques or methods used by the workers. (Robbins p.38)

    Read More

  • Team Dynamics - Conflict Resolution Strategies

    1188 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A., (2004). Organizational Behavior (6th ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill/Irwin. pp. 406- 441.

    Read More

  • Path-Goal Leadership Theory

    867 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2009). Organizational behavior: Key concepts, skills and best practices (customized 4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

    Read More

  • Taylor, Fayol, Mayo and Weber

    2891 Words  | 6 Pages

    The founding father of scientific management theory is Fredrick Winslow Taylor. He was an American mechanical engineer and an inventor. Modern management theorist Edward Deming credited Taylor for his contributions while Joseph Juran criticized his work for extracting more work from workers. However a careful reading of Taylor’s work will disclose that he placed workers interest as high as the employer’s in his studies. Before the principles of management are discussed it is very important to understand the causes which led Taylor to derive the four principles of management. The three causes are as follows:

    Read More

  • Organizational Group Dynamics and Politics

    1699 Words  | 4 Pages

    Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Konopaske, R. (2009). Organizations: Behaviors, structure, processes (13th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

    Read More

  • The Impact of Taylorism and Fordism on the US Motor Vehicle Industry

    1853 Words  | 4 Pages

    The major change came through the work of Fredrick Winslow Taylor and his theory of scientific management system. It was not that Taylor was unique or completely new; only time and motion study could be put in that category. The trend was already moving towards systematic management such as formal management methods or by cost ...

    Read More

  • Evolution of Management

    660 Words  | 2 Pages

    The evolution of management though the decades can be divided into two major sections. One of the sections is the classical approach. Under the classical approach efficiency and productivity became a critical concern of the managers at the turn of the 20th century. One of the approaches from the classical time period were systematic management which placed more emphasis on internal operations because managers were concerned with meeting the growth in demand brought on by the Industrial revolution. As a result managers became more concerned with physical things than towards the people therefore systematic management failed to lead to production efficiency. This became apparent to an engineer named Frederick Taylor who was the father of Scientific Management. Scientific Management was identified by four principles for which management should develop the best way to do a job, determine the optimum work pace, train people to do the job properly, and reward successful performance by using an incentive pay system. Scientifi...

    Read More

  • Taylor's and Weber's Theories of Management

    1089 Words  | 3 Pages

    Taylor’s scientific approach is based on the planning of work to achieve efficiency, standardization, specialization and simplification. Factories are managed through scientific methods and productivity is increase through a mutual trust between management and workers. Weber's bureaucratic approach embellishes the scientific management theory and focuses on dividing organizations into hierarchies, establishing strong lines of authority and control. Weber believed that organizations are accountable to and part of a broader the social order.

    Read More

  • Classical Organization Theory

    1570 Words  | 4 Pages

    The concept of scientific management is based on the idea that work could be studied to increase efficiency, and specialization. Economist Adam Smith changed the way the world looked at the economy and organization. In his essay, “Of the Division of Labour,” Smith emphasizes the importance of specialization, and how division of labor leads to specialization. He states that this would allow a worker to be more productive and efficient (Shafritz, Ott, & Jang, 2011, p. 41-45). Frederick Taylor introduced the principles of scientific management, which stated that management is a science, workers should be scientifically selected and trained scientifically, and both management and workers should work together.

    Read More

  • Classical Management Theory

    1964 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are three well-established theories of classical management: Taylor?s Theory of Scientific Management, Fayol?s Administrative Theory, Weber?s Theory of Bureaucracy. Although these schools, or theories, developed historical sequence, later ideas have not replaced earlier ones. Instead, each new school has tended to complement or coexist with previous ones.

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of Scientific Management Essay

    806 Words  | 2 Pages

    Scientific management is a theory of management that analyzed and synthesized workflows. Its main objective was improving economic efficiency, especially labor productivity. It was one of the earliest attempts to apply science to the engineering of processes and to management. Its development began with Frederick Winslow Taylor in the 1880s and 1890s within the manufacturing industries. Its peak of influence came in the 1910s; by the 1920s, it was still influential but had begun an era of competition and syncretism with opposing or complementary ideas. Although scientific management as a distinct theory or school of thought was obsolete by the 1930s, most of its themes are still important parts of industrial engineering and management today.

    Read More

More about The Need for An Adequate Evaluation of Organization Behavior

Open Document