Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relation between education and social class
The significance of motivation in education
Functions and roles of hidden curriculum
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relation between education and social class
The Nature of the Hidden Curriculum
(a) According to Marxist, the main aim of the education system is to
provide capitalist with a workforce equip with all the values,
attitudes and beliefs that will assist them in their aim to maximize
profits.
If the aims of capitalism are to be achieved it will need to be
consistently supplied with a docile, highly motivated and subservient
workforce. The education system achieves this through the
implementation of the hidden curriculum. The hidden curriculum
consists of the things that students learn through attending school.
It is not the content of lessons that is important but rather the
values and beliefs that are passed from the teacher to the student
during the teaching process. The hidden curriculum produces a suitable
future workforce by ensuring that students learn to accept the
hierarchy that exists (Bowles and Gintis). Schools are structured in a
hierarchical principle of authority and control. Teachers posses all
the power and control over students. They decide what is learnt and
how it is taught. Students have no control over the contents of their
educational life, they learn to accept the subordinate position they
hold within the school stratification system. This acceptance thus
prepares them for the position they will hold in the workforce, in
which they will have to defer to the authority of their superiors.
Within the experience of their school life students learn to be
motivated by external factors. Education in itself is not
intrinsically motivating to the student, as they have so little
control over what they learn. They are expected to intake what is
being taught without questioning it. It is therefore easy to see why
most students do not find education or rather schooling a very
satisfying process. As they are not obtaining any internal
satisfaction, they turn to the external rewards that can be obtained
as a result of acquiring an educational qualification. They therefore
stay in the system now motivated by the attractive wage packages etc,
which can be obtained as a result of being educated.
Juveniles are being taught that in order to have a nice car, branded cloths and the house of their dreams, by getting into an expensive mortgage, they have to be an employee of a huge corporation. In addition, they have to undergo to a prestigious school, study hard, have excellent grades in order to become popular and respectable in the world. However, many people would not become those super leaders, but these majority of people have a great role in the capitalism society of the US. As Gatto says, “We buy televisions, and then we buy the things we see on the television. We buy computers, and then we buy the things we see on the computer. We buy $150 sneakers whether we need them or not, and when they fall apart too soon we buy another pair” (38). Such results are in part of a wrong education that teenagers have received trough many decades. In addition, Gatto highlights that modern educational system has been working in a six basic functions methods that makes the system strong and unbreakable: The adjustable function, indulge students to respect authorities. The integrating function, which builds the personality of the students as similar to each other as possible. The diagnostic and directive function, which allows a school to set permanent scholar grades in order to determinate his or her future role in society. The differentiating function, which gives to the student a good education and after his or her role is diagnosed, they prevent any educational progress. The selective function, function that the system has used to prevent academic growth for the non-selected students. The propaedeutic function, which works in the selection of specific groups of intellectual adults to keep perpetuating the system all over again making it a continuous sequence. (Gatto 34). Gatto’s facts revealed the survival of the educational system for decades,
The first scholarly essay I am going to discuss is Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work by Jean Anyon. Anyon believed that students of different economical statuses and the schools in their communities taught differently. She used schools in four different types of communities. The four types of communities are working class, middle-class, affluent professional and executive elite. She studied the students, teachers, principals, and staff as well as
Jean Anyon’s “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” claims that students from different social classes are treated differently in schools. Anyon’s article is about a study she conducted to show how fifth graders from the working, middle, and upper class are taught differently. In Anyon’s article, she provides information to support the claim that children from different social classes are not given the same opportunities in education. It is clear that students with different socio-economic statuses are treated differently in academic settings. The curriculum in most schools is based on the social class that the students belong to. The work is laid out based on academic professionals’ assumptions of students’ knowledge. Teachers and educational professionals assume a student’s knowledge based on their socio-economic status.
The Australian Curriculum is fluid, ever-changing and highly politicised. There is constant debate surrounding what should, and should not be taught in Australian schools. The Humanities and Social Sciences (HASS) Curriculum in particular, has undergone dramatic changes over the last few years. This essay will critically analyse two provocations relating to the HASS 7-10 curriculum, and some of the surrounding issues that HASS teachers contend with on a day to day basis. The first provocation, the purpose of Civics and Citizenship teaching is to teach about democracy, not for democracy, will be examined in relation to opinions regarding left-wing bias in the Civics and Citizenship curriculum, and the idea that the course teaches too much ‘for’
Both authors want what is best for society overall, which in their views are individuals that are “socially well-adjusted and educated citizens who are industrious…[and] benefit society” (Ray par. 1) by creating a stronger work force. This issue is not only important for each student’s future, but over time it has become a focus of parents as they try to ensure the absolute best education for their child. As Cox found, “an increasing number of parents are recognizing the battle that is waged for their children’s hearts and minds” (Cox p. 34) and it is important that their children are equipped with the best hearts and minds so they can effectively function in society. Both of the authors for these articles acquired advanced education which may explain their bias toward the importance of education. However, evidence shows that education is one of the factors responsible for the success of a nation. Workers, who after graduation are able to “enter the working world equipped with the same basic education,” have a step up from those who were not able to fulfill those educational standards. While society says that it values education, it is apparent that actions are not being seriously taken by the educated population to effectively keep public education as a focus in policy holder’s hands.
In modern democratic society school curriculum has become a prioritised concern for many citizens. It is a key factor in the shaping of future generations and the development of society. Decades have lapsed and numerous attempts have been made to produce a national curriculum for Australia. In 2008 it was announced that the Rudd government in collaboration with State and Territories would produce a plan to move towards a national curriculum (Brady & Kennedy, 2010). To date this has been realised in the deliverance of the Australian Curriculum v1.2 which will be examined in this paper.
When presented with a list of such book titles as To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Of Mice and Men, educated and book-loving individuals alike are often reminded fondly of timeless American classics. These novels are frequently taught in advanced literature classes throughout U.S. schools, by highly respectable teachers. However, shift the focus of the matter to an alternate group of people, and you will find these brilliant literary works in a much different category: Banned lists (Kelly). Censorship is defined as “deleting parts of publications or correspondence or theatrical performances” (Wolfram Alpha). Needless to say, the practice of banning books easily fits that description.
Gattungswesen is traditionally thought of as being based in social interactions. Marx was a dialectical materialist that famously believed that “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles”. This led to his belief that Gattungswesen is based in labor and production. However, a person’s labor is only relevant to him when the work is purposeful. By not being able to connect to their work or see its purpose, laborers are severed from their Gattungswesen, the core of their humanity. In schools, any question as to how the curriculum is relevant to the “real world” is quickly shut down, most infamously in math. Often times, the curriculum is specialized to a degree where any relevance to the student as a person is lost. If a student is interested in one area of a class and would like to learn more about it, teachers simply can not allow for more time than originally allotted for a specific topic. With class sizes so large and syllabi so structured, a student’s education is so generalized that he is often unable to find his niche, his passion, what it is that he wants to do with his life. A student’s inability to connect to his work leads to school being reduced to a
“Motivation is the process whereby goal-orientated activity is instigated and sustained” (Schunk, Pintrich & Meece, 2008. As cited in Eggen & Kauchak, 2010, p.284). Motivation comes in many forms and can be divided into two broad categories - extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Extrinsic motivators are external factors which can motivate a student; rewards are an example of this. An issue with extrinsic motivators is that the desire for the learner to participate often lessens, once the rewards are withdrawn (McCullers, 1987). On the other hand intrinsic motivation comes from within - learning for the joy of it - where the desire to learn leads to a higher level of knowledge, and is a reward in itself. Kohn (1996, p.285) states that research suggests, “Rewards actually decrease interest in intrinsically motivating tasks, therefore sending the wrong message about learning” (as cited in Eggen & Kauchak, 2010a)
Students ' racial and economic background, their parents ' education level, their access to high quality preschool teaching, school funding, peer influences, teachers ' expectations, and curricular and instructional quality. Paraphrasing Marxism, in theory, it is a way of understanding and investigating a structure of society. It is also a way of analyzing how societies develop and change. For example, imagine you are looking at education through your pair Marxist glasses; you might perhaps see that school’s prime children and young adults become workers in the capitalist economy, creating economic determinism. This intern generates division. An excellent example is one taken from Marxist theory itself; the rich and less disadvantaged are the “haves” and the poor or disadvantaged are the “have
Teaching is one of the most well-known professions all around the world. However, it is also extremely underestimated, especially when it comes to teaching elementary school students. Jenny Peters, writer of the article Confessions of An Elementary School Teacher, observes that it is indeed a “challenging career” that in the end has “immeasurable rewards” (1). However, no matter what you have to do, it seems as though those rewards overrule anything and everything as long as your heart is in it, not only for the students, but for the drive to teach them and lead them to bigger and brighter futures.
When reviewing the literature regarding the past, present and future of educational curriculum, several main points seem apparent, namely that curriculum is cyclical, that a dilemma or paradox exists, and that curriculum must be looked at with a sensitive view.
These things are job and mass education. In real life, we cannot survive without these things. Without one thing, you cannot do the other things. If you need a good job to survive, you need a better education. Because good jobs, give us lots of new opportunities comparable to any bad jobs. Good jobs give lots of benefits. As a mention in the book that how we have to face the difficulties with the bad job so it is really good if we have good job for our surviving. For example, the MacDonald employee. So it 's really good that if you are working in a profession that really interest you compare to do any other jobs that did not interest you and you are doing those jobs just for your
Education is man’s most valuable possession: it is the concept through which one’s love for learning stems, and the equipment used to pave an individual’s path to success. Although easily influenced by the opinions of others, education is one of the few concepts that neither internal nor external stress can strip from our being. The future of our society lies in the hands of our educators; the values and morals instilled by such figures govern the actions of the earth’s people.
Are we utterly lost with our education system today? There is no concrete answer to these questions, and I don’t believe there ever will be. What we do know is that there are many current problems with education. Education is like wax, constantly morphing to the social constructs of humanity at the time. We currently live in an individualistic time, unaware of the power education holds. While many might think that social money and family determine classes; the class structure is built mostly around education. The difference between these three philosopher’s theories and today is that they all worked to uncover the true meaning of education. In the future, I hope that we will move toward an education system similar to Socrates theory. Today, many students see little to no meaning at all to education and merely see education as a means to success, wealth and power. We must encourage the study of these philosophers in our schools to help students understand how much power education holds. As Socrates described best, we, as students, must be the gadfly, and awaken our society to injustices and constantly question the world around us. Education is ultimately the best gift we could be given, and we should appreciate it and attempt to understand its foundations. By uncovering the truth behind education, I have found that education should be offered to all, encourage curiosity, and lead to a well-rounded