The NCAA Should Pay Student Athletes
analytical Essay
1869 words
Did you know college athletes on average practice 43.3 hours a week while participating in a sport of their choice? College athletes have rigorous schedules not only do they have to practice at their best ability every day at practice, but have to make sure their grades are up to par. Juggling school and sports is not just tough it is very time consuming. With a very long and physically tough schedule these athletes do not have time to look for jobs much less have a job. Although they might not have a job they do make tons of money, but not one cent goes to these athletes. How you ask, these athletes make billions for the NCAA and millions for their respective schools, with apparel, merchandise and television contracts that would break the bank. The NCAA should pay student athletes because the money these athletes make for their school far outweighs the money the schools invest in the athletes.
An average day for a college athlete consists of morning practice, morning weights, school, study hall and practice. That is quite a schedule; professional athletes do not even have such a dense schedule. Morning weights for athlete are a usual thing but it is still tough, exhausting and grueling. After weights they now become a full time student, they go to school almost every day. In Howard’s article he states “Unlike professional athletes college student-athletes deal with the pressure to excel academically to remain eligible and work towards receiving their college degree” (Howard 1). That is a lot of stress on one young man’s shoulders juggling sports and school at the college level; it is not high school where a teacher holds your hand. Once these athletes are done with school they have study hall where they get help fro...
... middle of paper ...
...r a shoes. Give them enough money to let them go out and do some fun stuff. What should happen is they should give these athletes a set amount of money to the student-athlete no one gets more and no one should get less.
Works Cited
Boiler, Drew. “Is it time to pay college athletes.” Nytimes. Web. 30 Dec. 2011. 23 Mar 2014.
Frommer, Federic. “Northwestern Football Union.” New.medill. Web. 12 Mar. 2013. 23 Feb.
2014.
Gowsky, Dirk. “Should NCAA Pay for Play.” Usanews. Web. 03 Mar. 2012. 23 Mar 2014.
Howard, Jabari. “Finding a Balance.” Npr. Web. 03 Apr. 2013. 23 Feb 2014.
Kolbrosky, Bryan. “Striking A Balance.” News.medill. Web. 19 Mar. 2011. 23 Mar, 2014
Smith, Chris. “March Madness: A Trip to The Final Four Is Worth $9.5 Million.” forbes. Web.
14 Mar. 2014. 11 Apr. 2014.
Holden, Lindsey. “Pay-to-Play” nbcnews. Web. 12 Feb. 2012. 23 Mar. 2014.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes practice 43.3 hours a week while participating in their chosen sport. juggling school and sports is time consuming, and athletes make billions for the ncaa and millions for their respective schools.
- Analyzes how howard's article states that college student-athletes deal with the pressure to excel academically to remain eligible and work towards receiving their college degree.
- Explains that student athletes don't get paid because they're labeled amateurs, but they practice just as hard as professional athletes. they get hurt, tired, and stressed just like a professional.
- Argues that the fallacy of the "student-athlete" moniker grows more egregious as the ncaa revenue from the tourney reaches astronomical heights.
- Analyzes how college athletes are paying in themselves and don't lose any money. they are doing their school a favor by playing for their respective schools.
- Analyzes how the ncaa wastes money on scholarships, but the money goes back to the school for a higher pay raise.
- Analyzes how the ncaa makes a ton of money off of athletes' hard work, but the athletes can't sell items that were given to them by the school.
- Explains that many people believe that athletes should not be paid, and that they get top-of-the-line training from the school which allows them to be physically prepared to play professionally.
- Opines that the issue of college athletes living below the poverty line will remain a hot topic until something is resolved from both sides.
- Analyzes how boiler, drew, is it time to pay college athletes? nytimes.
- Opines that the ncaa should pay for play. gowsky, dirk.
- Opines that march madness: a trip to the final four is worth $9.5 million.
Related
- analytical
- opinion
- College Athletes Should Be Paidanalytical essayCollege athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that college athletes should be compensated in some form because they generate huge amounts of revenue for their schools.
- Explains that college sports are equivalent to working a full-time job, and that ncaa officials are concerned about the amount of time spent on sports.
- Analyzes how the ncaa and universities benefit enormously from college sports. the ncaa is strict on making sure that athletes should be treated no different from any other student.
- Explains that the ncaa and universities make money, but the college athlete is restricted to small amounts of scholarship money.
- Argues that paying college athletes on top of scholarships is too complex and costly for the ncaa.
- Opines that the athletes should be able to market themselves and receive benefits outside of the university because they generate so much money for schools.
- Explains that bilas was taken to a page that contained links to buy texas a&m jerseys emblazoned with the no. 2. the ncaa doesn't profit off the names or likenesses of individual players.
- Opines that letting athletes market themselves would not hurt the ncaa or universities financially, and would bring more attention to their athletics.
- Opines that college athletes are exploited by universities and the ncaa to make money, therefore, they should not have restrictions to prevent them from making any money.
- States bilas, jay, "players should be compensated." the new york times company, 14 mar 2012.
- Opines that college finances 2012 is a report from usa today. gannett satellite information network, inc.
- Analyzes how the end of the football season produced $37 million in media exposure for texas a&m.
- States dorfman, jeffrey, "pay college athletes? they're already paid up to $125,000 per year." forbes.
- Quotes pennington, bill. "expectations lose to reality of sports scholarships." new york times, 10 mar 2008.
- Analyzes staples' article, "online jersey sales highlight ncaa's hypocrisy on amateurism." sports illustrated.
- Analyzes thomas, brennan, "pay for play: should college athletes be compensated?" bleacher report.
- States wieberg, steve, "study: college athletes are full-time workers." usa today, 13 jan. 2008.
1376 wordsRead More - Should Student-Athletes Be Paid?analytical essayCollege athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes are one of the hardest working people in the world. they play for school pride and bragging rights, not because it is their job.
- Argues that colleges should reimburse athletes for the millions of dollars they make off of their athletic abilities.
- Explains that paying college athletes would eliminate some of the problems that occur due to rule violations. the ncaa creates all the rules and regulations and works diligently to enforce the law.
- Opines that the ncaa should revise the rule so that players could make money off of autographs or receive a stipend from the school for playing sports.
- Opines that athletes should be paid for all the time they put in to sports because they deserve it.
- Argues that scholarships should be given for all that an athlete provides to a school. colleges and the ncaa should come together to pay the student-athletes during the active season.
- Argues that student-athletes should be paid to encourage them to stay in school and finish their education.
- Argues that college athletes should be paid money because otherwise it is unjust.
- Opines that college sports are a big money business and college coaches have become millionaires because of the student-athletes.
- Analyzes birkenes, adele, and akash bagaria's "pay to play." current events feb 06 2012: 7. proquest.
- Explains woods, al, and christine watkins, sports and athletes: an anthology, greenhaven press, 2009.
- Analyzes cooper, kenneth j., "should college athletes be paid to play?" diverse issues in higher education.
- Opines that college football players should be paid. the new york times upfront nov 17 2008: 22. proquest.
- Opines that the ncaa requires the loss of contests for six ohio state football student-athletes.
1960 wordsRead More - College Athletes Should Be Paidopinion essayA question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities.
- Analyzes the unfairness of coaches compared to players, stating that coaches are allowed to advertise while players aren't.
- Opines that college athletes should be rewarded for all the overtime they have to do to make up school work.
- Analyzes how big universities are taking advantage of student-athletes and making a lot of money off them. sports teams at texas, florida, georgia, michigan, and penn state each earn between $40 million and $80 million in profits.
- Analyzes the economic impact of basketball star patrick ewing to georgetown university during his four years there in the early 1980s.
- Opines that a star athlete that the public loves brings ungodly amounts of publicity and recognition to the school.
- Explains that attending a big-name school allows people to brag to peers and other people they know whenever the questions "where do you go to college" come up. it also enables the university to recruit the up and coming star athletes.
- Opines that college athletes should be paid. sports and athletes, ed. james d. torr.
- Opines that phillip a. whitner and randall c. myers the journal of higher education, vol.
- Describes brennan, eamonn, "men's college basketball nation blog." espn, 27 aug 2012.
1467 wordsRead More - The Debate Over Paying NCAA Athletes Or Notopinion essayMany people believe that players in the NCAA should not be paid for the sports they play, yet others believe that since they’re risking their future and injury that they should be paid. NCAA players should be paid for the sports they play but only the elite players should be paid. For example players such as Johnny Manziel from Texas A&M, Jameis Winston from Florida State and Tre Mason from Auburn should be paid for their success in college Football, these three players produced numbers this season that people haven’t seen in years, and many analyst believe that they need to be rewarded with money for their success as great football players. The debate of college athletes being paid or not began basically as soon as the NCAA was formed. There’s no debate that only Division 1 athletes should be paid because they worked the hardest to get to where they’re at.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that ncaa players should be paid for the sports they play, but only the elite players, such as johnny manziel from texas a&m, jameis winston from florida state and tre mason from auburn.
- Explains that the ncaa began in 1906 and was started by president theodore roosevelt to encourage reforms to college football practices in the early 20th century.
- Opines that only the division 1 elite athletes should be paid, such as johnny manziel, who won the heisman trophy and led his team to the chick-fil-a championship bowl.
- Analyzes how the auburn running back, tre mason, is an elite athlete in division 1 ncaa and should prove why in the nfl.
- Explains that forbes author jeffery dorfman does not believe that college players should not be paid for their sports.
- Cites the article "a point-by-point evisceration of the myths preventing ncaa athletes from getting paid."
- Explains dorfman, jeffrey. "if you want college athletes to be paid, talk to the nfl and nba."
968 wordsRead More - Should College Athletes Be Paid?analytical essayCollege athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into their budget and the budgets of the universities. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, and they generate huge amounts of revenue.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the ncaa and universities benefit enormously from college sports. johnny manziel, the first freshman to win the heisman trophy, generated $37 million of media exposure.
- Argues that paying college athletes on top of scholarships is too complex and costly for the ncaa.
- Argues that college athletes should be compensated for their time and effort, as they generate huge amounts of revenue.
- Argues that the athletes should be able to market themselves because they generate so much money for schools. the only fair compromise is to let these athletes make money by branding themselves.
923 wordsRead More - College Athletes Should Not Be Paidanalytical essayWaking up before the sunrise is a daily routine. Early morning film sessions, class, then practice, which dominates the day. There are few moments in between for food and socializing, but the life of a student athlete is anything but ordinary. Sleep, eat, practice and school are all an athlete knows, and with the pressures of campus life it becomes even more difficult. No time for much of anything, let alone getting a job. Like most students, these athletes need money, but do not have a spare moment to work. Without any source of income, athletes are put at a major disadvantage. Their full-time job is athletics, in addition to rigorous college-level courses. The possibility of becoming a professional athlete and making millions becomes very appealing. This course of action leads to student athletes making money illegally, dropping out of school, or leaving school early without a degree in an often futile attempt to play at the professional level.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the life of a student athlete is anything but ordinary. they need money, but don't have time for much of anything.
- Explains that student athletes can focus on school and sport without worrying about money. graduation rates are higher, and later in life, players are more successful in their respective professional fields because of the maturation process.
- Explains that professional athletes are well compensated to play the game they love, but the college athlete gets paid nothing. the ncaa bans athletes from receiving payment in any way, even when sports are not involved.
- Argues that the ncaa and all universities are to provide athletes with an education and a degree. graduating college with the means to earn money is more important than making money while in school.
- Opines that paying students athletes leads the ncaa down the wrong road.
- Opines that college sports are one of the most successful businesses in the country. if universities compensate athletes, they would not have a reason to leave school early to make money.
- Argues that athletes need to be compensated for the extra time and work they put in for their university.
- Argues that college athletes should not receive any type of monetary compensation from the ncaa or the university itself.
- Analyzes amateurism for its athletics, morning edition (npr). 07 may 2013. points of view. ebscohost.
- States greenlee, craig t., "college athletes deserve some equity." black issues in higher education.
- Opines that it’s time to pay student athlete lynn nery. npr talk ok the nation, june 2013.
- Analyzes king, bill, and the atlanta journal and constitution's "the junkyard blawg: play for pay?"
- Opines that athletes shouldn’t expect to be paid anytime soon. maisel, ivan, and bigchalk.
1872 wordsRead More - College Athletes Should Be Paidanalytical essayLast September, the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) cut a deal with CBS for a fourteen year, eleven billion dollar contract to broadcast the infamous March Madness basketball tournament. The NCAA also agreed to include sixty-eight teams instead of the previous sixty-five. Currently, there’s talk again between the NCAA and CBS of expanding the tournament to ninety-six teams- all because of money. Of the eleven billion dollars the NCAA will rake in over the coming years, the players actually playing in the games will not get a single cent profit. According to Martin Manley, a prestigious statistical sports analyst, if each player from the 346 Division I schools split the eleven billion evenly, they would receive $2 million each. Similarly, The University of Texas just made a deal with ESPN, a popular sports show, for 300 million dollars to create their own TV station. This station will showcase Texas and carry most of their football and basketball games (Hiestand). This argument is not about handing collegiate players $2 million dollars, it’s about giving them a small cut of the billions of dollars they generate. Athletes that play on revenue-producing teams should get some type of monetary reward for the millions of dollars they bring in to their school and the NCAA.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the ncaa cut a deal with cbs to broadcast the infamous march madness basketball tournament. they argue that collegiate players should get some sort of monetary reward for the millions of dollars they generate.
- Argues that most athletes at the di level receive scholarships, arguing that they have no time to work for spending money. after the regular season, the athlete has three weeks until preparation for the next season begins.
- Opines that off-season training takes up as much time as in season training, if not more. the ncaa should change this rule and encourage "under the table" deals where college boosters pay the top high school athletes to dominate their playing fields.
- Argues that paying revenue-producing athletes would encourage the idea of staying in school instead of leaving for professional leagues before receiving a degree.
- Explains that college athletes at these big-time, powerhouse programs are putting time in year-round just to keep up with the competition. normal students are allowed to receive spending money and living expenses as part of financial aid, while athletes cannot.
- Explains that paying the players would alleviate problems with players receiving illegal benefits from ambitious boosters who think that is a fair way of going about their business.
- Analyzes how the ncaa handed down the "death penalty" to the dominant program, putting recruiting at a huge disadvantage.
- Explains that dallas cowboy hall of famer, michael irvin, was paid for play while at the university of miami.
- Opines that college athletes should be paid because it's the right thing to do. the same players that entertain us every weekend don't have enough money to entertain themselves.
- Opines that everyone working in the place is being paid: the hot dog vendors, television broadcasters, guy peddling game-day programs, person whomanufactured the university-logo jerseys and caps that are for sale at the souvenir stands, employee changing lightbulbs in tunnel.
- Concludes that division i schools and the ncaa need to start paying athletes monetary rewards for the thousands of dollars they generate.
1160 wordsRead More - The Effect of College Athletics on Academicsanalytical essayThe average division 1 football player devotes 43.3 hours per week to their sport giving them 3.3 hours more than a typical American work week. With those statistics, I think it’s safe to say that being a collegiate athlete requires more than a full time job. Trying to keep up with homework and attendance in class poses many challenges especially when the NCAA requires students to miss class for championship games, televised games, or other events that bring in revenue for the school. ...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that college sports are a time for young people to develop and grow in their education, but where would these sports be without dedicated athletes?
- Quotes gary gutting in the myth of the ‘student-athlete’.
- Explains the cause and effect of being a student athlete.
- Analyzes shoup, rick, kinzie, julian, and zirin, dave. "the shame of the ncaa march madness generates a tidal wave of revenue-but the players don'
881 wordsRead More - The Argument for Paying NCAA Football Playersanalytical essayLuzer, Daniel. "College Guide: The Profit in College Sports." The Washington Monthly. N.p., 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the ncaa's discrepancy over whether student-athletes should be paid is particularly unsettling within the sport of football.
- Argues that college football programs have the money to pay their players. the ncaa generates $11 billion annually in revenue, with fifty schools exceeding $50 million and five exceeding $100 million.
- Explains that the university of texas' football program generates about $103 million of the schools' $123 million in total revenue.
- Explains that many former college football players have signed on to the idea that college athletes should be paid, and that the money would actually be beneficial.
- Argues that the ncaa's rule to not pay student-athletes violates section 1 of the sherman antitrust act. some judges are now ruling that college athletes are in-fact employees.
- Analyzes how the ncaa has been rife with corruption and under-the-table deals, especially dealing with football and basketball.
- Argues that the ncaa's refusal to pay college football players is unfair.
- Explains that ncaa football generates a lot of revenue every year and provides entertainment. the issue over compensating players has heated up with concerns over whether college football players are employees or not and thus entitled to pay.
- Opines that college athletes should not be paid for their athletic endeavors. pr, newswire, us 23 july 2012: regional business news.
- Analyzes how college athletes should be paid to play college football.
2003 wordsRead More - We Should Pay College Athletesanalytical essayOver the years, the debate on whether or not to pay collegiate athletes, specifically Division 1, has increased greatly. With athletes bringing in millions of dollars to their respective schools, many believe it’s time to make a change. The debate has been ongoing since the 70’s, maybe even earlier, but it really came to the attention of many in the early 90’s, specifically 1995. Marcus Camby, a basketball player for the Toronto Raptors, admitted he took money and jewelry, from somebody who wanted to be his agent, while he was playing at the University of Massachusetts. This was one of many incidents that involved a player accepting money and other gifts from an agent and/or booster. I believe that college athletes deserve to be paid in some fashion. They devote their whole life to their sport, whether or not they are the starters, and most will not go on to the pros, even though they contribute to the team. They sell tickets, jerseys, T-shirts etc. for their school, and see none of the money. Coaches sign six figure deals with shoe companies, like Nike, Reebok, Converse, and the players are the ones wearing the shoes and jerseys, the coaches have on whatever they want. Even though just recently the NCAA Committee allowed athletes to get a job; between schoolwork, and practices, they don’t have enough time to find a job. Most of the kids come from poor backgrounds, and don’t have enough money to do normal college things, like going out to eat, going on a date, or out to the movies.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that college athletes deserve to be paid in some fashion. they devote their whole life to their sport, whether or not they are the starters, and most will not go on to the pros.
- Opines that the only people that can change this are the directors of the ncaa.
- Analyzes coomes, mark, and eleanor goldstein's "the run for the money." courier-journal, june 1996.
- Argues that paying college athletes will ruin the tradition and innocence of the game. olympians get paid, and most of them are amateur athletes.
- Analyzes how the ncaa gives athletes a chance—not time—to make money.
1292 wordsRead More