Difference Between William Faulkner And The Minister's Black Veil

1366 Words3 Pages

For this synthesis, I am choosing to write about “The Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne and “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner. I am choosing these specific passages because of their tone and narratives. These two short stories are written near a century apart yet still share an unceasing ominous and sepulchral tone throughout. The focus of death surrounds each story but the purpose of writing each is different and is obtained with different and quite contrary narrators and narrative voices. “The Minister’s Black Veil”’s purpose is to leave the reader questioning while “A Rose for Emily” has a purpose of surprising the reader. It can be argued that Hawthorne’s use of narrative voice is more effective than Faulkner’s when it comes to telling the story and this is what I intend to prove throughout this essay. …show more content…

This can be presumed because of Hawthorne’s upbringing in a Puritan family and his references to this same time period in his other works such as “Young Goodman Brown” (1835) and “The Scarlet Letter” (1850). This story tells the tale of a town terrified reaction to their minister, Mr. Hooper, who had “Swathed about his forehead, and hanging down over his face, so low as to be shaken by his breath, Mr. Hooper had on a black veil.” (Hawthorne 331). The town does not take well to this choice and rumors being to stir about it acting as a symbol of Mr. Hooper being “under the consciousness of secret sin” (Hawthorne 335) or having something to hide. Hooper repeatedly dismisses these accusations but continues to wear the layers of crape upon his face. Time goes by, Mr. Hooper ages, becomes ill, passes away, and is buried, all with this same mysterious black veil still draped upon his

Open Document