Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reasons to not reinstate the military draft
Why we shouldnt reinstate the draft
Why we shouldnt reinstate the draft
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reasons to not reinstate the military draft
The Military Draft: An Unwise Solution The United States of America's military is currently involved in two major wars with U.S. opposition in Afghanistan and Iraq. All though both of these efforts can be said to be in the clean-up stages, many more soldiers will be needed to stabilize the regions, to provide police work, and to fight the insurgencies that have risen in opposition to the invasion of U.S. troops into foreign lands. The current presidential administration states that to adequately deal with the problems of post-war Iraq and unstable Afghanistan the United States needs to increase the number of active-duty soldiers serving over-seas. Top officials in the administration have said that a reorganization of the military is already in progress, and it will create more combat regiments, but the quoted additional 25,000 new military participants needed per year can hardly be met through these minor reorganizations. In addition, recruiting numbers are at their lowest in over ten years (?All Things Considered?, NPR News Source.) Many feel that the reenactment of the military service draft is inevitable because it is the only way to come up with the astounding number of new troops needed to finish the jobs started in the Middle-East by George W. Bush and his Republican administration. If increasing the size of the military is inevitable, then the draft is the wrong way to go. Aside from the moral objections that many Americans have to a draft, there are major logical fallacies in the reasoning that a draft would benefit the military, America, or its interests abroad; therefore, the draft should not be reenacted to increase the number of the United States? combat troops. The most obvious problem with a military draft is that it creates soldiers that do not want to go to war. Currently our army is volunteer-only, and no one can be forced to enlist if he or she does not want to. This maintains our army as efficient and dedicated to its goal with its members being committed and personally connected to the well-being of American interests. These voluntary soldiers are the best kind of soldiers because they believe in what they are doing. Generalizing slightly, they are willing to give their lives for this country and the missions that it takes on in the world. If a draft were reenacted, this would not be so. Upon forcing citizens to enlist, ou... ... middle of paper ... ...war in Iraq, if the draft were to be reenacted, the underlying statement by wealthy politicians and businessmen would be that they are willing to sacrifice the lives of the youth at random to maintain their own financial comfort. The draft is an unwise solution to any military endeavor that cannot find the adequate number of troops to fulfill its mission. If people have to be forced to participate in a war, perhaps it was irresponsible to carry it out in the first place without a plan as to how the entire thing would be carried out with the existing military forces. Needing a draft to aid a military campaign also shows that the citizens do not wholly support the cause, because they are not standing up to fight for it. Forcing these people to fight would be disastrous. At home, riots and protesting would ravage the nation and bring to our domestic life a great deal of turmoil. Abroad, soldier morale and ability would be greatly reduced by forcing people who have never been soldiers, and who never wanted to be soldiers, to be soldiers. The draft is therefore an obsolete mechanism of war, and should never be reenacted for the good of our stability, morale, and military strength.
During the First World War, Canada suffered a great conscription crisis that divided the nation. The French-Canadian nationalists, led by Henri Bourassa, opposed conscription and felt that they were fighting an English war, and therefore felt no obligation to fight. The vast majority of those who enlisted during the age of voluntary recruitment were Anglophones; in contrast, very few Francophones volunteered to fight. On 17 May 1917, Prime Minister Robert Borden announced that military service was to become compulsory among men of fighting age of all classes. French-Canadians protested; however, despite their best efforts, the Military Service Bill came into effect. The protest eventually led to lengthy riots. Following this, Canada became
But in 1980, President Carter reinstated the draft in a way, stating all men born after January 1, 1960 were require to register with Selection Service, but this was not reinforced after about he of 1986. Today, the question is debated about whether or not we, as Americans, should reinstate the draft. Those in favor of reinstating the draft argue that our country would be safer, those drafted would learn important lifelong lessons and build characteristics that today’s generation has lost, and Americans would learn to appreciate more, something our society has forgotten. Those who oppose the draft argue that there would not be many, if any, families that are not military based and have to worry about loosing people in their family. Reinstating the military draft is
Simply put, the United States has no need for a draft. As of December 31, 2013 the United States has the second largest military in the world according to the Department of Defense. The largest military in the world is China’s People’s Liberation Army which is also all voluntary. The People’s Liberation Army consists of approximately 2,300,000 members. As of the end of 2013, the United States military consisted of approximately ...
Resolved: The United States should reinstitute a mandatory military draft. To help understand this issue a little more we will define some words. Reinstitute: Something that was put to use, and now is being put to use again. Mandatory: A law permitting no option and cannot being disregarded. Draft: Certain people selected. There will be many different problems if the military draft is NOT reinstituted and there are three major proofs already.
A conscription is needed to bring the rich and poor together in alliance and create National Unity. Mark Finelli states, “Because until the wealthy have that vested interest, until it’s the sons of senators and the wealthy upper classes sitting in those trucks.” Meaning that he believes until the rich have vested connection to the men on the battlefield that they will not care enough to fund. Demonstrating a split between the common person and a politician or rich. They can not relate to suffering of those who military is only resort, and therefore won’t care as to what happens to their men. This draft will bring together those of all social classes and the reorganization of funds will improve the rates of survival for all. As stated in Mandatory MIlitary Conscription, “Unlike the all-volunteer force, a conscripted force of citizen soldiers would ensure that the burdens of war are felt equally in every community in America.” The author of this article is clearly claiming the draft will ease the burdens of war to be equally distributed, so that no certain group feels like they have all the burden of their shoulders, no longer would we have social disrupting regarding one class having an advantage over the other for both sectors will be drafted and both will be side by side aiding, this is additionally supported by the statement,
Yet we continue to stick with the all volunteer force. General Stanley A. McChrystal, former commander of the international forces in Afghanistan, states “ I think if a nation goes to war, every town, every city needs to be at risk,”.What Gen. McChrystal was arguing was that if we get involved in a war that the whole country should be involved, not just the select few who want to be involved. Then author Thomas E. Ricks argues that when Gen. McChrystal spoke that it was the first time that a high a high profile military Officer has spoken out against the AVF, (all volunteer force)(Ricks). This just goes to show that even our military personnel agree that we need a stronger military. If we revise the draft we should include males and females ages 18 to 35, this would increase the size of our military tremendously. They all don't necessarily have to go to war either, Their are plenty of other government jobs they can do. For example, paperwork, and driving high military personnel around. Now with professional soldiers freed from low skills jobs we can now have more troops to protect our country
The article also says the draft should be reinstated because, “More than 53,000 have been wounded, many narrowly survived by the miracle of modern medicine” (Rangel 1). Representative Rangel makes a very valid point but reinstatement of the draft would go against our constitutional right of freedom of religion because the 10 commandments state that “Thou shall not commit murder” (Exodus 20:13). Also the draft should not be reinstated because it is very unfair and will still be unfair because, “During the draft era, well connected parents got their sons into the reserves or less hazardous active duty”(Ruschmann 62) this would most definitely carry on to now because nobody wants their son to serve in the military. The armed forces prefer volunteers more than draftees because volunteers have “Chosen to accept the military’s culture of obedience and selflessness” (Ruschmann 41). Statistically proven ,all volunteer military has been the best force in American
...hletes recruited to attend college come from lower, working-class families. The opportunity to enter the draft early to help their families financially is one that will hardly be passed by.
...e unnecessary moneymakers, products of lies and deception behind the scenes, orchestrated by powerful and rich men who usually never suffer but, rather, gain from their machinations to create war. I support a National Service Obligation system that would draft all persons, at age 18, to serve for 18 months in some form of public service. This would allow American citizens to contribute to the country in different ways. But it should be one?s own decision how to contribute to the country. As said before, I believe that reinstating the military draft will not increase patriotism or a sense of duty, but will rather decrease the effectiveness of the military and will create huge protest feeling among country?s citizens. Therefore we should explore every possible way to contribute the country?s future instead of just putting our future and ourselves in the Meat Grinder.
Ever since World War II, the last war that garnered full American support, the percentage of American citizens enrolling in the U.S. Army has diminished significantly. The U.S. is a major military power in the present world; American soldiers are engaged in many multi-theater positions, consequently dispersing troops over various regions worldwide. As only one in ten citizens has served in the US Army, American knowledge of military conditions is rapidly lessening along with the national harmony that complements such knowledge. Therefore, the comprehension that American security is closely associated with a formidable military never resonated within the greater part of modern American citizens. Although antiwar activists may decry compulsory conscription as unconstitutional, it needs to be reinstated in order to solidify the meaning of being an American citizen, boost the economy by providing jobs, and unify the American people with enhanced homeland security.
Therefore, with that pressure more people should be volunteering for the military, but of course they aren’t. Which suggests that reinstating the draft would be a good idea. With more soldiers, we could handle many more conflicts and situations since we could spread the military out and have them dealing with different situations at once. Not only that, but if a war were to suddenly start, we would have the numbers needed to be successful in the war. In almost any aspect, reinstating the draft has no disadvantages. It would only make our country's military stronger and more prepared. I also believe that reinstating the draft would bring the country together. If more people were fighting in the war then more people would care about it since they are personally affected by it. Therefore, I think it would draw the nation together as a whole, Clearly, reinstating the draft would be beneficial because it would create a bigger military that could solve more problems at once, prepare us for any sudden wars, and draw the nation
Conscription, also known as drafting, is a practice that requires mandatory enlisting into any of the branches of the armed forces. This practice has been adopted by the United States at the very least two times before and from what I can remember during World War II and the Civil War conscription was being practiced. Nowadays conscription is not practiced in the United States because there isn’t a need for it. Now, if you want to join the army you can do so by volunteering. However, there are people who believe conscription should be brought back. Some people believe that the drafting of younger people might help these young people develop useful skills and cultivate a sense of unity and national pride. Although all of these are valid reasons,
The concept of the draft has been in the U.S for 75 years. The first time it was used in the U.S. was in 1940. Franklin D. Roosevelt used the draft to fill vacancies in the military that could not be filled voluntarily. The draft required all male citizens from the age of twenty-six to thirty-five to register to be selected to serve during both time of peace and conflict. It was ended in 1973. The draft should not be reinstated because we do not want people with very low I.Q. levels, people that do not want to be there, and American terrorists to be drafted.
The United States ended the military draft in 1973 and since then the military has relied on volunteer men and women to fight for our country. Americans have been questioning whether or not people are physically and mentally prepared to meet the needs of the United States military. The United States should reinstate the military draft. First of all, many civilians take the freedom they have for granted. If they serve in the military, it may help them realize how much advantage they have for living in a country that has freedom. The draft will help Americans not be so entitled and help them appreciate how much the military has done for the United States. All citizens have the obligation to serve this country when the need arises. In addition,
Mercedes Benz is a German car manufacturer known for being “the best or nothing,” their slogan represents not only their line of luxury vehicles but also their business. Mercedes has always had a successful reputation for magazine ads, hence this one. Latest from the advertising team, the cover shows off the new 2017 Mercedes-Benz E-Class. Packed with all new advanced safety features such as self-braking, self-correcting, and self-parking. The ad showcases not only the exterior of the car but also the lavish interior. This technique quickly grabs the reader’s attention and achieves its purpose of informing consumers of “the future of transportation.”