Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Meiji restoration Introduction in brief
Meiji restoration summary
Meiji restoration summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Meiji restoration Introduction in brief
The characteristics of the state within Japan and China have caused certain implications towards beginning high and low economic development respectably. The Meiji Restoration in Japan allowed the state to control economic growth where the government could take away the benefits of the companies while in China, the Great Leap Forward lead to inefficient production and an economic disaster from bottom-up devolvement there. In this paper, I will argue how the aspects of the Meiji Restoration lead to high economic growth in Japan between 1950-1980 and how the characterizes of the Communist Party lead to low economic growth between 1958-1961.
The outcome of Japanese economic development from 1950 to 1980 is how Japan evolves into a developmental
…show more content…
The state within China does not promote economic development, this general theory is how there is a bottom-up development with set boundaries that allowed for no change within the state, the lowered capacity of the state to monitor and implement economic development within a state, and how the moderate land reforms by the state lead to a horrible famine in size. The variation in states within Japan and China led to economic development in one and economic turmoil in China is how the state could control the benefits that the countries corporation’s had. In countries like Japan, the state controlled the corporate world by either giving the businesses incentives to encourage grow such as subsides or to take away the allocation of money from the businesses that showed no sign of pushing economic growth within Japan. In countries like China, the state had control over the economy, but the state had no control over the production of businesses because of the low monitoring effort from the state and there were no incentives within these economies to encourage growth so the economy during the Great Leap …show more content…
The political institutions within Chain are composed from the Communist party which led to the economic growth and turmoil in the 1900s, one institution was the formation of the Yenan Way by the Communist Party to provide public goods to the Chinese people and to build a new bureaucracy within China, and the failure of the Great Leap forward that was imposed by Mao to encourage growth within the rural part of China, opposite of the West, which lead to an economic disaster and a famine within the country. The changes in the state structure within Japan had induced a high economic development were caused by the increased competition Japan has had with the West in order to become a more profitable world power, the breaking up the Zaibatsu which broke apart large conglomerates, and allowed for a more diverse economic system where the changes to the private sector within Japan that would lead to a favorable business-government relationship (Johnson, 161). The changes in the state structure within China caused a shift in the Chinese economy were caused by to the Chinese Communist Party breaking away from Mao, the
Following the Chinese Revolution of 1949, China’s economy was in ruin. The new leader, Mao Zedong, was responsible for pulling the economy out of the economic depression. The problems he faced included the low gross domestic product, high inflation, high unemployment, and high prices on goods. In order to solve these issues, Mao sought to follow a more Marxist model, similar to that of the Soviet Union. This was to use government intervention to develop industry in China. In Jan Wong’s Red China Blues, discusses Maoism and how Mao’s policies changed China’s economy for the worse. While some of Mao’s early domestic policies had some positive effects on China’s economy, many of his later policies caused China’s economy to regress.
From the 19th century to the early 20th century, a series of multiple revolutions occurred throughout the globe, leaving Japan, Italy, and Mexico forever revitalized by new ideas, leadership, and developing governments. In this essay we will discuss and contrast the revolutionary goals, leaderships, and tactics found in the Mexican Revolution, the Meiji Restoration, and the Risorgimento. Although each revolution is characteristically different and important in its own way, we will examine the efficiency of each and determine which one was ultimately the most effective.
Japan was a country of contradictions in the early 1900's. Her growth in industry was a major factor for influencing her growth of power; whilst at the same time their structure was a very traditional political one. The Japanese Emperor Hirohito was right in the centre of the Japanese government. The emperor made Japan very militaristic and the military had a very strong influence in Japan. Japan's growth in industry had risen greatly since in the preceding 50 years and still it continued to grow.
The Tokugawa period, also known as Edo period (1603-1867), was the final period of traditional Japan that lasted for more than 250 years (britannica.com,2013). The period was a time of internal peace, political stability, and economic growth under the Shogunate founded by Tokugawa Ieyasu. The Tokugawa Shoguns maintained strict control over the structure of society by keeping a firm control over what they were allowed to do and what they were not allowed to do.
In the middle of the 19th century, despite a few similarities between the initial responses of China and Japan to the West, they later diverged; which ultimately affected and influenced the modernizing development of both countries. At first, both of the Asian nations rejected the ideas which the West had brought upon them, and therefore went through a time period of self-imposed isolation. However, the demands that were soon set by Western imperialism forced them, though in different ways, to reconsider. And, by the end of the 19th century both China and Japan had introduced ‘westernizing’ reforms. China’s aim was to use modern means to retain and preserve their traditional Confucian culture. Whereas Japan, on the other hand, began to successfully mimic Western technology as it pursued modernization, and thus underwent an astounding social upheaval. Hence, by the year 1920, Japan was recognized as one of the world’s superpowers, whereas China was on the edge of anarchy.
In the late nineteenth century, Japan’s economy began to grow and industrialize. Because of the scarcity of natural resources in Japan, they relied on imported materials from other countries. In September 1940, the United States placed an embargo on Japan by outlawing exports of steel, iron, and aviation fuel, because Japan took over north...
In States vs. Markets, Herman Schwartz presents two economic development strategies that have been employed by late industrial developers in order to either take advantage of existing comparative advantages or facilitate rapid industrial growth through state intervention and provision in order to gain a competitive foothold in world markets. Schwartz demonstrates how China was able to employ elements of these development strategies to generate capital from an abundant rural labour supply in order to pursue industrial development and attract foreign investment through economic reform starting in the late 1970's.
China's capitalism and boom was born when their president, Deng Xiaoping permitted the provinces to dismantle their communes and collective farms. This led China to venture into free-market economics, although they were still under the communist political system. When President Deng announced that they needed Western money and expertise, China flung their trade doors wide open and China went on a capitalist drive without ever looking back. By mid 1960's, the Chinese Revolution settled down to the job of ruling China. Its main goal was essentially nationalist: a prosperous modern economy. While there continued to exist substantially economic inequalities, distribution of wealth was probably a bit more equal than in most Western countries.
WriteWork contributors. "The impact of World War 1 on Japanese development in the early 20th century" WriteWork.com. WriteWork.com, 05 January, 2010. Web. 10 Nov. 2013.
In conclusion, I tried to explain what experienced in Japan during the first years of rapid economic growth in terms of its social consequences. According to my argument, I tried to show imbalances which occurred with economic development in post- war Japan. In other words, economic development cannot appear as linear social development. Post- war Japan has witnessed positive and negative social consequences after implementing economic recovery. Therefore, we can say that society cannot always embrace economic development positively. Economic transformation brings its own waves and thus society fluctuates regarding its embracement. Japanese society received its share with this economic recovery during post- war period.
So, if Japan does not “belong” to Asia, does it belong to some other amorphous collection of nations, namely Europe or the West? Certainly in the modern post-WWII era Japan has seen phenomenal economic growth, even to the point of threatening the US as the primary global economic power during the height of the “bubble economy.” Some credit this success to the changes implemented during the US occupation. Undoubtedly without US assistan...
Stockwin, J. A. Chapter 7: Who Runs Japan? In Governing Japan: Divided Politics in a Resurgent Economy (4th ed., pp. 46-72). London, The United Kingdom: Blackwell.
When the new Chinese Government was set up in 1949, the new government faced a lot of problems. First on their agenda was how to re-build the country. As Communist Party of China (CPC) is a socialist party, their policies at the time were similar to that of the Soviet Union’s. Consequently, the CPC used a centrally planned strategy as its economic strategy when it first began. For a long time, the Chinese economy was a centrally planned economy in which none other than the state owned all companies. In fact, there were absolutely no entrepreneurs. As time went on, the problems of a centrally planned economy started to appear, such as low productivity, which was the key reason for restricting the development of China. With the population growing, the limitations of the centrally planned economy were clear. In 1978 China started its economic reform whose goal was to generate sufficient surplus value to finance the modernization of the Chinese economy. In the beginning, in the late 1970s and early 19...
...high power status, Japan had to have a self-reliant industrial common ground and be able to move all human and material resources (S,195). Through the Shogun Revolution of 1868, the abolition of Feudalism in 1871, the activation of the national army in 1873, and the assembly of parliament in 1889, the political system of Japan became westernized (Q,3). Local Labor and commercial assistance from the United States and Europe allowed Japan’s industry to bloom into a developed, modern, industrial nation (Q,3). As a consequence production surplus, and food shortage followed (Q,3). Because of how much it relied on aid of western powers, Japan’s strategic position became especially weak. In an attempt to break off slightly from the aid of the west Japanese leaders believed that it would be essential for Japan to expand beyond its borders to obtain necessary raw materials.
O'Bryan, Scott. 2009. Growth Idea : Purpose and Prosperity in Postwar Japan. University of Hawaii Press, 2009. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed December 4, 2011).