The Mediterranean Countrymen: An Introduction To A Mediterranean Community

912 Words2 Pages

An area of great cultural diversity, the Mediterranean is volatile. As a response to the constant change in their communities, inhabitants in Mediterranean countries have found it necessary to negotiate homogeneity through modifications to their social institutions. While the importance of preserving a sense of nationalism despite an increasing governmental focus on individuality is argued by Julian Pitt-Rivers in his introduction to Mediterranean Countrymen: Essays in the Social Anthropology of the Mediterranean (1963), the diversity of these communities makes it difficult to determine not only to what extent but exactly which aspects of ocean-front life are deteriorating; such difficulties are explored in both Introduction to a Cyprus highland …show more content…

Despite a recognition of lifestyle variation among Mediterranean peoples, Pitt-Rivers greatly emphasizes the negative effect of integrated states; similarly, he emphasizes the importance of collective rights over those of the individual. Such negativity is a direct correlation of his focus on economics. Pitt-River’s analysis is primarily based on the economic instability of two opposing regions of Spain: the Anadalusian plains and the Pyrennean foothills. Although his argument is similar to Persitiany in that it incorporates the importance of inheritance and the difficulties associated with an absence of social mobility in an impoverished community, Pitt-Rivers fails to discuss in detail the social hierarchy of either village. This oversight weakens his argument as it does not factor in the significance of interpersonal relationships; his uneconomical conclusion that “stability of a society depends upon maintaining the continuity of … family heritage” (24) therefore seems to lack depth. The introduction’s paucity of social analysis is the main way it contrasts with his later essay, which places a greater significance on interpersonal relations. While this omission may be due to the concise nature of introductions, it renders his approach lackluster; that of Persitianty, who is addresses both the economic and sociocultural factors throughout his ethnography, is therefore more

Open Document