The Map of Art History Uses Order and Classification by Listing of Fields, Library System, and Plotting in Space and Time

1052 Words3 Pages

The Map of Art History essay is about how art history uses disciplines in societies to represents itself through order and classification. From many observations and theories it considers three subject: first is the listing of fields in art history, second is the library system is for categorizing art books, and third is the plotting of space and time in art history from survey texts. Also in the discussion the writer talks about the geography of art history such as where does the idea appear from? Other questions he asked was how and why do disciplinary classifications aspire are global remain local? What are the consequences of our continued use of mappings that have their beginnings and backgrounds in geopolitical spaces that no longer exist? The discipline in art history is a requirement that’s needed to be accorded to abilities and power to control or judge the borders that can be accepted or decline people and objects to teach for transmitting values to peers. Are examples the author uses for the understanding of discipline in art history is that structures are seldom to less studies and relation to present views, such as students who attend and introductory class are to read a survey book, or follow recommendation of curriculums whenever a colleague retires. Other examples he show are a chair that justifies and the dean endorses a replacement postion then the recent Ph.D. is to be hired, whenever the discipline or subfield. The disciplinary in art history is the gaze upon an issue and the issue. During the essay he will deliberately avoid most public and visual manifestation which was the museum, according to Robert Nelson (The Map of Art History, 28). Starting with the first domain which is the grid of fields. Fields a... ... middle of paper ... ...critics eyes as it looks at a piece of work and where the eyes follow. Also that the space and time for the LC system, the function is only a basic framework and the division of visual arts are a medium in fundamental antiquarian. Robert’s defense is Arnaldo Momigliano perspective upon early-modern antiquarian to modern historian which is most historian would write in chorological order while antiquaries write in a systematic way. The other perspective is Historian find facts to discover and explanation in multiple ways and an antiquarian examines a research relations connected to the exact subject (The Map of Art History, 32). Overall Robert’s essay was really persuasive to me and it provide enough strong evidence where it convince me to agree with the idea of having art history and disciplines also societies to represents itself through order and classification.

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes how robert approaches fields as a list of neither natural, consistent, nor logical based on cultural categories, less than those of societies and the function of compliers.
  • Analyzes robert's argument that the library system is for categorizing art books, stating that books are disciplinary and hold so much order and control over society because of the knowledge it provides.
Show More
Open Document