Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
analize william carlos williams Use of Force
analize william carlos williams Use of Force
analize william carlos williams Use of Force
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: analize william carlos williams Use of Force
In the two short stories The Use of Force by William Williams, and The Man in the Well by Ira Sher all have differences, but also have some similarities. While the short story by Williams is about using force to help a child, and Sher’s story is about the kids helping a man get out of a well they both talk about helping someone in need. Both of theses stories do not have a happy outcome and leave the ending open for discussion. Theses two short stories both authors do a good job at being descriptive, and give very detailed information to the reader. Both theses authors discuss the thoughts of little kids and how they react to different situations.The kids in theses two short stories have all the power basically. While it seems to be about …show more content…
Their reaction was to not help the man, however; they could not think of a reason not to help him and the decision was final. “I never want very close to the lip of the well, or I only came to my hands and knees, so that he couldn 't see me”(116). Although none of the kids could ever see this man they didn 't allow it either. The man in the well could still hear the kids playing and having a good time so the man in the well went out on a limb and called out for help. “at first afraid to disobey the voice from the man in the well, we turned around and actually began to walk towards the nearest house”(116). The little kids knew something wasn 't right when they began to get closer to the house. The kids decided to turn around and go back to the well where they would question the man. “What 's your name”(116)? a very simple question, however; the man in the well did not think so and became angry when the kids didn 't have a ladder. The man in the well began to give more options to the children to get him out of the well. The man in the well was no longer asking he was demanding. The kids were very quiet the whole time while standing around the well. The man still asking questions the kids just stood there. The children standing around the well could not even imagine what would would be like trying to it only made matters worse. The man …show more content…
They both have children who have to face a situation. How the kids handle these situations is totally up to them. The kids take matters into their own hands by not allowing to be manipulated by an adult. While in Williams story the little girl is facing a doctor she still does not give in. The little girl does not have to do anything she doesn 't want to, and in the end is forced to do what she doesn 't want to do. In Ser’s short story the kids have the ultimate decision whether or not they will help this man. The kids not informing their parents give them all the power to do whatever they want to do. The kids had some common sense when it came to the man in the well, however; if there was a man down there they left him to die in a way. The kids all around in Sher’s story were intelligent, but should have gone for help whether it was a good idea or not. Both theses short stories everything is in the children 's control. In Williams short story the little girl was defeated, but only by force. Sher’s story the kids had won but also been defeated by the knowledge of knowing there was still a man stuck in a well. In both stories the kids have to deal with their own consequences, because they made the adult decision and that will stay with them the rest of their
In both stories, the main characters are both girls. They both have mothers. They got discouraged at times because there were things that happened to them that brought them down. Cynthia wanted to talk to the boy at the grocery store but never did, and that made her discouraged. Adoja was being brought down by her Nana because her Nana thought she had too thin of legs, so that discouraged her too. But in the
These two stories, although written by two different authors present similarities in the characteristics of the main character. Sammy and Tommy are presented with adversity they had previously never faced. Sammy has to decide should he stand up for the girls by quitting and be the hero or should he mind his own business and keep his job. Sammy is forced to quickly make a decision which his boss Lengel feels he made to rashly. “’I don’t think you know what you’re saying,’ Lengel said” (Updike, pg. 146). For Sammy his decision is what he feels he needs to do and he never regrets his choice. Tommy is faced with adversity of a different kind, he has to decide should he believe the teacher and listen to what she is saying or should he, like the other children, think she is strange and a liar. When she loses her job Tommy is forced to make a decision, confront the child who got her fired, or stay quiet and let the matter slide as it is not his problem. For both the boys their actions could be beneficial to them or it could cause them future problems. An example, if Sammy...
They heard! I was certain of it.” The characters aren’t developed very much in both of the stories, however, their characteristics are different. The main characters in both of the short story are two people, but the protagonist is developed innocent and the antagonist is unrighteous in “Click Clack and Rattle Bag”, “I reached over and tousled his hair.” “I would have pulled away, then, if I could, but small, firm fingers pulled me forward, unrelentingly, into the dark.” show that the young man wants to take care of the kid, but the kid uses his good looks and tone and finally kills the man. And on the contrast, the
The mother and daughter have a very distant relationship because her mother is ill and not capable to be there, the mother wishes she could be but is physically unable. “I only remember my mother walking one time. She walked me to kindergarten." (Fein). The daughter’s point of view of her mother changes by having a child herself. In the short story the son has a mother that is willing to be helpful and there for him, but he does not take the time to care and listen to his mother, and the mother begins to get fed up with how Alfred behaves. "Be quiet don't speak to me, you've disgraced me again and again."(Callaghan). Another difference is the maturity level the son is a teenager that left school and is a trouble maker. The daughter is an adult who is reflecting back on her childhood by the feeling of being cheated in life, but sees in the end her mother was the one who was truly being cheated. “I may never understand why some of us are cheated in life. I only know, from this perspective, that I am not the one who was.” (Fein). The differences in the essay and short story show how the children do not realize how much their mothers care and love
...hts and disputes in LOTF, there was no apologies and compromising. Issues kept on getting worse and worse. Male and female youth are different. Boys don’t like to talk things out. It’s more of fight now, talk later. Girls just like to talk. It can get physical but talking is preferred. Both stories handle youth violence and issues differently.
...olent incidences contrast in specific details and their fathers personas, both children lose their innocence and gain the experience and knowledge to question life and make logical decisions.
Every human is given the gift of agency, how we use this gift is quite different depending on the person. In the article, The Man in the Water, we see an unidentified man use his agency for something much larger then himself. This man uses his agency to demonstrate selflessness for those around him. He also elected to show courage and to be a strong leader in dire circumstances.
Children literature is a term that refers to the texts written for children. The artist uses creative ways to ensure that children are provided with educational books, touching on a variety of themes. This paper will include comparison of two characters from the two texts, “Hana's Suitcase: A True Story,” authored by Karen Levine and “Charlotte’s Web,” written by E.B. White, with the aim of understanding ways in which problems are solvable as indicated by selected characters.
“You will grow up on your own time; no one can force you,” is the main lesson in both of the stories Everything Will Be Okay and Out of my Mind. Both of the main characters, James and Melody, want to be just like someone and want to do what they do. Also, these two characters realize that they have to be themselves, and no one can force them to be something that they aren’t. These two stories may be very similar in the way that they teach this life lesson, but they are also very different.
story as the corruption of evil takes a prominent role in the story of the two children. The
At the time, the children did not really feel like they were doing anything wrong, but they did know enough to bring the man food and water. Even though they were not going to help him get out of the well, they still wanted to help him in some way. Whenever the man would ask if help was on its way, the children would always lie and tell him help would be there soon. I don’t understand the need these children felt to keep lying to the man. They kept giving him a false sense of hope. The children turned their visits into a game asking the man questions, with the man also asking the children questions. Most of the questions the man asked the children would answer, but the man never answered a question that the children asked him. ‘What’s your name?’ Was the first question that was asked by the children. This question was reoccurring by both the man and the children. People are born into this world nameless and they are strangers. Whe...
In the beginning of both of the pieces of literature, the main character(s) have not had the experience that will shape their values yet. Rather, as time moves forward in the stories, the
There are many reasons as to why the man in the well was made up. After the children found this man, they never spoke of the man to anyone other than the other kids that were at the well with them. None of the children’s parents were ever informed of the man that was trapped. The only thing that the children were worried about was learning more about this man. The children asked him simple questions, though. They asked what his name was and if there was water in the well, but they never asked how he got in the well or how long he had been in there.
The stories have the same purpose to teach young kids a lesson but can be seen as abnormally dark and frightening. In “The Golden Bird” from The Complete Fairy Tales of Brothers Grimm, follows a fox who tries to show a young boy the way to help his kingdom find a golden bird. The lesson in the story quoted by Brad’s review is “If you are the “Chosen One” you can eschew all advice, screw up constantly, and still come out on top.” In all of his attempts to retrieve the golden bird that was owned by another kingdom he had been caught by the king and sentenced to death unless he was able to retrieve a golden horse. This story continues with the boy being caught by other kingdoms and assigned to other tasks to steal items for the different kings. The boy still receives help from the fox even if he did not heed the fox’s advice, but simply because he was the one that was chosen to complete the task he does not need to listen to the advice of the fox since his fate is already chosen. In the end of the story the fox requests the boy to end its life, and when the boy kills the fox it transforms into a prince that was said to be lost long
The children couldn’t accept what they thought was so horrible. There was a lot of ignorance and carelessness portrayed throughout this short story. The theme of ungratefulness was revealed in this story; The author depicted how disrespecting someone can inturn feed you with information you may wish you never knew and how someone can do one wrong thing and it immediately erases all the good things a person did throughout their