Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
explain public service broadcasting
explain public service broadcasting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: explain public service broadcasting
Citing academic sources briefly explain the main characteristics of public service broadcasting/media. Can public service broadcasting/media survive in a multiplatform digital on-demand media landscape?
By Caitlin Valentina Jones
W1537904
Television has revolutionised the way we see the world and has shaped us as human beings. We have seen the most cherished and beloved moments as well as the cruelest and heart-wrenching on the small screen. Public service broadcasters were the first to emerge with the invention of the TV and to this day produce television programmes to millions of people around the world. Over the past six decades, television has evolved and new technology developed at rapid speed and it
…show more content…
Radio was funded by the government with the intention to inform, educate and entertain the public. This was also the case in Canada and Australia, where they followed the BBC example. Once television was made more assessable to the UK public in the early 1950s, the government took that under its remit as part of the BBC. Public service broadcasters were developed at the same time such as ABC in Australia, CBC in Canada and PBS in the United States. Public service broadcasting television had been funded by the government in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom while in United States various benefactors such as affiliate stations and universities funded their …show more content…
John Whittingdale, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport says that households not owning a television will soon pay a license fee for the BBC iPlayer catch up service as he plans to change the legislation to cover users that replay programmes on the service. The BBC should earn £150m in loses from catch up users that watch BBC player on their laptop and tablets. This legislation update will be phased during 2018- 19 aimed to retrieve all loses by
‘Liveness’ is a unique quality that has almost always been exclusive to the medium of television, only ever really being shared with radio, and more recently the internet. When it comes to televisions ‘liveness’ its clear to see that it has been its distinguishing feature amongst other visual mediums. However, Marriot stated that By the end of the twentieth century most television transmission on most channels were no longer live.” (Marriot, 2007) thus suggesting that televisions once key feature of ‘liveness’ is perhaps no longer an important or defining feature. Despite the apparent lack of live television today “liveness’ was one of the features that cause television to overtake the likes of radio, cinema, and theatre across the globe.
“Constructing Canada: Do we need a public broadcaster to enhance democracy?” written by David Taras, a professor at the University of Calgary and director of Alberta Global Forum. Taras reinstates the turning point of Canada Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and their relationship with the Canadian parliament. He addressed on the developments and struggles Public Service Broadcasters (PSB), specifically CBC, encounter in order to continue to telecast. Lastly, he explains that PSB has a major role in maintaining the balance of power between the government and the mass media. PSB were created by the public for the public because a democracy can only happen if everyone cooperates.
In this paper, I will explain why public support is important, but not essential for the Public Broadcasting Service to fulfill its mission to provide alternative programming to the American public. I will show how public broadcasting would exist without the support of the federal government, and then explain why the positive externalities created by public broadcasting lead to market failure and suggest that government support of PBS is in the best interest of society.
...tricted by channel capacity and it can provide diverse audiences at once. Moreover, with the online internet anyone can gather all information they need as well as the social networking in ways that people can interact in real time even from the distance and lay bare to a new perspective of democracy. From that standpoint, the young generation will even consider the difficulty public service broadcasters will face.
In Neil Postman’s book “Amusing Ourselves to Death” we take an in depth look at how different forms of media and technology have transformed our world and our society. He more specifically wanted to point out the dangers and issues that our society faces because of our fixation on television. I think that Posman’s fears should be acknowledged and taken into consideration because television impacts us a lot more than we would like to admit.
Over the centuries, the media has played a significant role in the shaping of societies across the globe. This is especially true of developed nations where media access is readily available to the average citizen. The media has contributed to the creation of ideologies and ideals within a society. The media has such an effect on social life, that a simple as a news story has the power to shake a nation. Because of this, governments around the world have made it their duty to be active in the regulation and control of media access in their countries. The media however, has quickly become dominated by major mega companies who own numerous television, radio and movie companies both nationally and internationally. The aim of these companies is to generate revenue and in order to do this they create and air shows that cater to popular demand. In doing so, they sometimes compromise on the quality of their content. This is where public broadcasters come into perspective.
...rom broadcast media also heralds an opportunity. In a world of self-service digital, where consumers compare everything according to value, online video is the ultimate table stakes. For mere pennies a day, consumers can get the content they want (that’s key) when they want it on whatever device they are using. They can watch their shows on their time from the mobile phone or a tablet or a computer or a smartTV. And that is the ultimate value for whatever it costs. Perhaps broadcast media can figure it all out in time. Perhaps they can stave off Judgment Day by evolving their business models to provide the kind of value consumers want. Then they become just another online video provider competing for the same eyeballs as everyone else. Changing their business model (away from subscriptions) would require Herculean efforts.
...hat is wanted by the consumer, as opposed to the use-value (ideology) that is needed by capitalism. These two obligations may--but need not--overlap. They may--and probably will--come to contradict each other. Characteristically, it may be precisely when capital and the accumulation of capital become the dynamic of cultural production that the ideological functions secured by that production escape social control and become problematic. In conclusion, we can expect greater possibilities within commercial television than within state-controlled television: the BBC.
Technology has greatly progressed specially in the area of multimedia communications of which television is one of them. From the very first black and white television drama, “The Queen’s Messenger” up to current full-colored “reality TV” show “Joe Millionaire”, a lot has happened. Below is the table of the different eras of TV Programming and their corresponding brief descriptions:
It all started with a guy named Philo Farnsworth in 1927,when the television was first invented. In a book called Television: Technology and Cultural Form by Raymond Williams, who was a Welch academic, novelist and critic, noted, “Television was invented as a result of scientific and technological research. It powers as a medium of news and entertainment was then so great that it altered all preceding media of news and entertainment.” Many speak and say the television has altered this world. Television was invented as a technological research and then became so popular amongst the people as entertainment. Beyond any doubt, this source of mass media has and is changing our lifestyles. Television is with us wherever we are, it eventually becomes a part of us. We watch TV as we eat breakfast, eat lunch, and eat dinner. Television wakes up with us and goes to sleep with us. It gives us pleasure, it is sometimes boring us, and most definitely challenges us.
... small media reforms (like public journalism) will be enough to reduce the commercial and corporate imperatives driving our existing media systems (Hackett and Zhao, 1998, p. 235). Instead, a fundamental reform of the entire system is needed, together with a wider institutional reform of the very structures the media systems work within, our democracies. This will be a difficult task, due to powerful vested interests benefiting from the status quo, including media, political and economic elites. Reforms will need to be driven by campaigns mobilising public support across the political spectrum, to enable the citizens of the world to have a media system that works to strengthen democratic principles as opposed to undermining them. This task is challenging, but it will become easier once people begin to understand the media’s role in policymaking within our democracies.
This essay is about how televisions have developed over the years and how the technology of televisions has influenced people’s lives and how it has changed the way we share and receive information.
“I wanted to escape Small Town U.S.A. To dismiss the boundaries, to explore. My life experience came from watching movies, TV, and reading books and magazines. When your culture comes from watching TV everyday, you're bombarded with images of things that seem cool, places that seem interesting, people who have jobs and careers and opportunities” (Trent Reznor). The previous quote describes what television means to so many Americans. In a culture like ours, mostly every way we communicate is through cell phones, computers, tablets, and radios. One interesting way is the television. The following paragraphs describe the positive and negative effects of the technology known as television on our past and present.
Within this essay I will analyze how Radio and Television Broadcasting differs in approach within the UK and US. This essay will explain how the UK use Radio and Television Broadcasting as a Public Service opposed the US who dominate these services as a Private enterprise and will then determine which approach is better and why.
Media is the most powerful sector of an economy. It is a tool to maintain a balanced society which is characterized by well informed people, effective democracy and social justice. In fact, media has unparallel influence on all aspects of human life in modern times.