The Magic Of Chaos By Peter Carroll

1325 Words3 Pages

The Magic of Chaos

Crowley certainly helped put the boot in against monotheism but the process was already well

advanced. Science, which had basically evolved out of renaissance magic, had more or less finished

monotheism as a serious parasite on advanced cultures. Crowley was enthusiastic about science and

appropriately so for his era, but in the work of Austin Spare we begin to detect a certain foreboding.

However it is Spare's work that appears more austere and scientific when compared to some of Crowley's

more baroque symbolic extravagances. Spare rejected the classical symbologies of forgotten ages and

sought the magic of his own personal arcana. Using the minimum of hypotheses he evolved a magic

from his own racial memories and subconscious. Independently of complex systems he developed

effective techniques of enchantment and divination requiring only ordinary language and pictures.

Spare's work forms the bridge between an older style of magic brought to fruition by Crowley (which

derived most of its appeal, power and liberating potential from its religious style of anti-religion) and the

new magic. The new approach is characterised by a kind of scientific anti-science. This is increasingly

becoming known as Chaos Magic. It would be no more useful to dub Chaos Magic as pseudo-science

than it would be to dub Crowley's ideas as pseudo-religion. It is astrology as it is normally practised that

is mere pseudo-science much as satanism and freemasonry are pseudo-religion.

Chaos Magic attempts to show that not only does magic fit comfortably within the interstices of science

but that the higher reaches of scientific theory and empiricism actually demand that magic exists. This is

somewhat analogous to the way in which many religious theories implied the possibility of theurgic or

demonic magic.

The best magic has always had a strong antinomian flavour. The most remarkable magicians have

invariably fought against prevailing cultural norms and obsessions. Their victories represent not only a

personal liberation but also an advance for humanity. History bequeaths us no records of the renegade

shamanist magicians who must have brought about the advent of paganism, but we know a little of the

anti-pagan magicians who created monotheism: Akhenaton, Moshe, Gautam, and so on. As monotheism

became a steadily more repressive and obscene force, a new generation of magicians arose and fought it.

Some fought too openly and were destroyed; others were more subtle and planted effective seeds of

destruction on a purely philosophical level, and others hastened its destruction by taking theological

and theurgical ideas to outrageous conclusions. The roll of honour is here much larger, including such

notables as Gordiano Bruno, Cornelius Agrippa, John Dee, Cagliostro, Eliphas Levi, and recently,

Open Document