The Level Of Inquiry: The Stages Of Critical Thinking

1000 Words2 Pages

Critical thinking is the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement. It has the quality to skillfully analyze, assess, and reconstruct. It is a “self” way of thinking because of the formations of opinions backed by facts and knowledge. Everything stems from critical thinking because it is something that is done every second. Levels of Inquiry is a part of the two types of reasoning, more specifically deductive reasoning. It is also how we go about performing critical thinking. It is the steps that are followed to successfully complete a thorough lesson of critical thinking.
First is the descriptive stage, and it is the starting point of the levels of inquiry. It is the describing state where the most details …show more content…

This stage is used to know the difference between relevant and irrelevant facts based on what information is provided. With this stage the system is also clear. Using knowledge to separate the important facts from the unimportant is the key to this stage. Focusing on the relevancy of the problem or question is what helps evolve this stage. Evaluating the explanation against knowledge is also helping to explain the stages and problem/question at hand. The Sherpa Walk uses deductive reasoning. The explain level comes into play when explaining how it is deductive reasoning and not inductive. Deductive reasoning is used in experiential education which is used in 3-D problems such as the Sherpa Walk (Sherblom,b.2015). It is the process of reasoning from one or more ideas or statements to reach a logically certain conclusion. It is also linked to power thinking and deductive reasoning for the Sherpa Walk means that the person blind-folded didn’t know their surroundings so he/she was counting on their helper to guide them. Basically this means that they did not know what was going on around them, so they started working backwards to make it clear. The conclusion is based on concordance of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be …show more content…

This is where the question “what if” is asked. It is the level where deeper level thinking is required. Connections between all the analyses are made and grouped together. Everything/all the steps come together to make up the extend level. The previous information is gathered to help form connections and think deeper on the topic. It explains distinctions and relationships, and it also shows understanding of the other stages as well. With this stage another problem or question could generate from the information provided causing the stages to start over again. The human knot caused the class to us communication skills to unravel it. Combing all the stages together to get to the extend stage means that we had to first see how everyone was tied together and then figure out different strategies to get out of it. Communication became the biggest help because it heled us understand and identify the answer/strategy to get out.
The levels of inquiry play a major role in/with critical thinking and everyday life. It breaks down situations and makes them easier to understand. It shows the key concepts of the problems/questions. It also helps answer or find a solution to the questions/problems. This is used on a daily bases for big or small problems. Levels of inquiry are complex problem solvers with many details for support, and critical thinking is the way a person goes about

Open Document