The League Of Nations: Analysis Of The United Nations

2149 Words5 Pages

Final Paper - Analysis of the United Nations

Of the many non-profit institutions, the United Nations is possibly the most prevalent and influential. The United Nations is an authority, extending influence over numerous countries, as well as garnering power and support from them. It began as a replacement, just after the end of the Second World War on the 24th of October, for the League of Nations. This ineffective organization’s flaws were due to it’s leadership by two of Europe’s most destroyed countries- France and England. These two diminished powers were unable to deploy their massacred armies or create trade restrictions...they instead relied on moral condemnation, which could mostly go ignored. It also had a disparate dispersal of power - the council couldn’t veto the actions of permanent members (France, Britain, Italy, Japan), meaning these four nations had a free-for-all.
The United Nations employs a far steadier structure, with greater regulatory power and territoriality. That being said, this organization is not without its faults. It’s continuously bogged down to the point of inefficiency by bureaucracy and the extensive number of participants. With some mild reorganization, the U.N
It is composed of fifteen member states, with five permanent members: China, France, Russia, The United Kingdom, and the United States. They hold veto power over their binding decisions, known as resolutions. The non-permanent participants in this branch of the U.N include Argentina, Australia, Chad, Chile, Jordan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Nigeria, the Republic of Korea, and Rwanda. Most of their terms have either just ended or will end within the next year. Terms last for two years, and representatives are voted in regionally by the General Assembly, and the Security Council President position rotates alphabetically among the members (UN in Brief,

Open Document