Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Risk strategy in banking
Washington mutual failure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Risk strategy in banking
Business Ethics
The largest bank failure
in
United States History
(Washington Mutual)
Introduction
Washington Mutual, Inc. was a savings bank holding company and the former owner of Washington Mutual Bank, which was the United States’ largest savings and loan association until it became the largest bank failure in U.S. history.
On September 25, 2008, the United States Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) seized Washington Mutual Bank from Washington Mutual, Inc. and placed it into the receivership of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The OTS took the action due to the withdrawal of $16.4 billion in deposits, during a 10-day bank run (amounting to 9% of the deposits it had held on June 30, 2008). The FDIC sold the banking subsidiaries (minus unsecured debt or equity claims) to JPMorgan Chase for $1.9 billion, which re-opened the bank the next day. According to FDIC, JPMorgan didn’t acquire WaMu's liabilities, including claims by shareholders and subordinated and senior debt holders, and it received $25 billion a few weeks later as part of the taxpayer bailout of the financial services industry. The holding company, Washington Mutual, Inc. was left with $33 billion assets, and $8 billion debt, after being stripped of its banking subsidiary by the FDIC. The next day, September 26, Washington Mutual, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 voluntary bankruptcy in Delaware, where it is incorporated.
Washington Mutual Bank's closure and receivership is the largest bank failure in American financial history. Before the receivership action, it was the sixth-largest bank in the United States. According to Washington Mutual Inc.'s 2007 SEC filing, the holding company held assets valued at $327.9 billion.
...
... middle of paper ...
...010/04/13/business/13wamu.html?ref=washington_mutual_inc
Levy, A., & Hester, E. H. (2008, September 26). JPMorgan Buys WaMu Deposits;
Regulators Seize Thrift (Update1) . In Bloomberg.com. Retrieved August 9,
2010, from http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aWxliUXHsOoA&refer=home
Stapilus, R. (2010, April 13). WaMu as toxic. In Ridenbaugh Press/Northwest.
Retrieved August 6, 2010, from http://www.ridenbaugh.com/index.php/2010/04/13/wamu-as-toxic/
Hudson, M., & Overton, J. (2009, January 9). The Second Savings And Loan
Scandal. In Forbes.com. Retrieved August 6, 2010, from http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/21/wamu-indymac-thrifts-oped-cx_mh_jo_0121hudsonoverton.html
OTS Fact Sheet on Washington Mutual Bank. (2008, September 25). OTS files.
Retrieved August 9, 2010, from http://files.ots.treas.gov/730021.pdf
From 1986 to 1989, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp. (FSLIC) closed 296 institutions with assets totaling $125 billion. With the creation of the Resolution Trust Corp. (RTC) in 1989 an additional 747 thrifts with assets totaling $394 billion were closed. That is a combined total of $519 billions in assets that contributed to a massive restructuring of the number of firms in the industry as stated by Curry & Shibut (2000).
One year ago, on September 8, 2016 the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau(CFPB), the Los Angeles City Attorney and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) fined Wells Fargo Bank $185 million, alleging that more than 2 million bank accounts or credit cards were opened or applied for without customers' knowledge or permission between May 2011 and July 2015. This essay will discuss the Wells Fargo scandal by explaining how the event happened and describing how the organization approached handling a response to the crisis. This will be seen, firstly by describing the how the scandal happened, and what were the causes, secondly by discussing the reaction of the company in front of the situation, how they dealt with the crisis and then
After the time of financial crisis, JP Morgan was not the only national bank in US which got involved in trade of toxic loans related to mortgage. Before JP Morgan, it was Goldman Sachs-another large US Bank that faced the allegation of manipulating the trades in its own self interes, ended up in favor of SEC while GoldMan Sachs were asked to pay $500 Million during late 2011 in a deal called Abascus 2007-AC1 where the bank were alleged to mislead its investors on a deal related to Collateral Debt Obligation(CDO). (Eaglesham, 2011) The ab...
...ade it impossible for railroads to borrow money. Railroads were highly leveraged and required loans to repay current debt obligations. When the financier of the Northern Pacific Railroad, Jay Cooke and Company, could not borrow more money, its investment house closed its doors and caused a panic on Wall Street. Nervous investors tried to withdraw their funds from investment houses and banks. Wall Street closed for ten days.
It is proper to present a business definition of merger as it found on legal reference with the ultimate goal in the pursuing of an explanation on which this paper intents to present. A merger in accordance with the textbook is legally defined as a contractual and statuary process in which the (surviving corporation) acquires all the assets and liabilities of another corporation (the merged corporation). The definition go even farther to involve and clarify about what happen to shares by explaining the following; “the shareholders of the merged corporation either are paid for their share or receive the shares of the surviving corporation”. But in simple terms is my attempt to define as the product or birth of a corporation on which typically extends its operation by combining with another corporation. So from two on existence corporations in the process it gets absorbed into becomes one entity. The legal definition also implied more than meet the eye. The terms contractual and statuary, it implied a process on which contracts and statuary measures emerge as measures to regulate, standardized, governing or simply at times may complicate whole process. These terms provide an explicit umbrella and it becomes as part of the agreement formulating or promoting a case for contracts to be precedent, enforced or regulated in a now or in the future under a court of law under the Contract Business Law Statue of Practice. As for what happens to the shares of the involved corporations no more explanation is needed as the already actions mentioned clearly stated of the expectations of a merge’s share involvement.
One of the major unintended impacts of the Dodd-Frank Act has been on credit unions and community banks. These banks weathered the credit crisis and lost only 6% of their share of banking assets between 2006 and mid-2010. A recent Harvard study indicates that this decline accelerated to 12% since the passage of the Dodd-Frank in July 2010. [a] While the community banks’ earnings increased by 12% to $5.3 billion by mid 2015 the number of these banks had declined according to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The number of banks with assets under $1 billion has declined from around 7500 in 2010 to less than 6000 since Dodd-Frank came into effect. [b] Increased compliance costs due hiring of new personnel to interpret the new regulations compelled these banks to cut down on customer service amongst other things. The law hurt them disproportionately and forced them to consolidate. Regulatory economies of scale drive the process of consolidation. A larger bank is often more equipped at handling increased regulatory burdens
Wells Fargo account fraud scandal One of the most recent white-collar crimes involved Wells Fargo, a banking and financial services provider. In 2016, San Francisco-based bank Wells Fargo (WFC) employees secretly created millions of unauthorized bank and credit card accounts without permission of their customers. Opening about 1.5 million fraudulent deposit accounts and submitting 565,443 credit card applications allowed Wells Fargo employees to boost their sales targets and receive bonuses. Consequently, customers were wrongly charged fees for accounts they did not know existed. In this business crime scenario, Wells Fargo is involved in paying $185 million in fines and refunding $5 million to affected customers.
The bank failures happened around 1920s to 1933. After hearing the news, everyone tried their best to withdraw all their money from their banks. Many wealthy people also tried to pull out their investment assets out of the economy. The total amount of the money lost was $140 billion, which is the money that people had deposited in their accounts (Facts About The Great Depression | Facts About Bank Failures). Bankruptcies were also becoming more common after the failures. Not only banks that got bankrupted, but around 32,000 businesses also went bankrupted and they closed down their stores (The Great Depression). Later on in time, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was created. FDIC is actually a U.S financial system by insuring deposits in banks and thrift institutions for at least $250,000. (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation). This system actually helped thousands of bank failures that happened from 1920s and early
The victims in the United States were: the largest commercial banks, the whole investment banking industry, the major savings and loans, the largest insurance company, and the two enterprises licensed by the government to smoothen the progress of mortgage lending.
Banks failed due to unpaid loans and bank runs. Just a few years after the crash, more than 5,000 banks closed.... ... middle of paper ... ... Print.
A Review of Management Techniques and Practices at Wells Fargo Bank. Over the past 150 years, Wells Fargo Bank has become one of the largest financial institutions in the North America. Wells Fargo Bank is much more than a bank. It’s a premium financial service provider.
In this paper I will identify and analyze the Wells Fargo scandal as it pertains to the breakdown of leadership and ethics. I will first identify and analyze the event and discuss the challenges and conflicts the scandal presented. Then I will evaluate the issue by explaining why the issue has interest and concern to stakeholders followed by discussing the challenges presented to individuals and/or organizations around this case. Lastly, I will recommend action steps that should be taken to those involved as well as discuss what I have learned from exploring this topic.
In 1926, they purchased a controlling interest in Safeway, which was their most paramount financial investment for the firm because it transformed a minuscule grocery store chain into the third most astronomically immense grocery store chain by the early 1930s (Edwin Perkins, 1999, p. 238). Furthermore Merrill, Lynch & Co. made prosperous investments in the companies’ early history. The company, founded themselves on five ethical concepts such as client focus, respect for the individual, teamwork, responsible citizenship, and integrity (Anne Szustek, 2014). Throughout the 1930s, Fenner & Beane was consistently the second most exceedingly immense securities firm in the U.S. the fused firm, which became the clear bellwether in securities brokerage in the U.S., was renamed Merrill Lynch, Perforate, Fenner & Beane (Wigmore, 1985, p.238). By March of 1958, the firm had become a Big Board member of the New York Stock
In 1911, however, as a result of the outstanding debts that the company had acquired, bankers stepped in and rem...
The bank failure in Jamaica illustrates how negative mindsets and behaviors can devastate the financial system and disrupt economic growth. The primary role of any bank is to safeguard its customer’s money, offer interest rate on deposits, lend money to creditworthy individuals, and make sound investment decisions to maximize shareholder value. Because of rapid economic growth between the late 1980s and early 1990s in Jamaica, the Central National Bank (CNB) and Worker’s Savings and Loans Bank (WSLB) loosened their monetary policies, provided preferential interest rates and extended credit beyond what was reasonable to members of its own board of directors, managing directors, and officers of the bank. These actions posed significant risks to the bank and its future.