The League Of Nations: The Failure Of The League Of Nations

722 Words2 Pages

Conclusion The lack of economic interdependence and the institutional void of the prewar years contributed to the forsaking of incentives of peaceful cooperation among states. Protectionism doomed global trade while powerlessness wrecked the League of Nations. A second image perspective suggests that the Great Depression and the subsequent social unrest instigated nationalist movements that paved the way for aggressive fascist regimes across Europe. Nonetheless, these arguments were not sufficient causes for the spark of the war, for the nationalist movements endorsed domestic reforms. On the other hand, the failure of institutions demonstrated that collective security stood not among the great powers’ vital interests – for instance, the League lost credibility after its inaction during crises in Manchuria and Ethiopia. In this way, the end of cooperation meant not the outbreak of war, but rather the first step of an escalating conflict. …show more content…

A first image argument could be made that certain leaders contributed to the further destabilization of the international system. For instance, Hitler was an unpredictable amalgamation of Kaiser Wilhelm’s hegemonic ambitions and Bismarck’s Machiavellian statesmanship. According to Mearshimer, “he not only played his adversaries off against each other, but he [convinced] them that Nazi Germany had benign intentions” (Mearshimer 2001, 216). Nonetheless, his concern for German security and consolidation as a powerful nation within the international system was no different from those of his predecessors. In line with this intent, Hitler alone was not the cause for World War II, in the same way that Wilhelm II could not declare war on the Triple Entente before the murder of Archduke

Open Document