Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect Of Kyoto Protocol
Easy about Kyoto protocol
Easy about Kyoto protocol
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect Of Kyoto Protocol
In regard to the Kyoto protocol David Miliband, United Kingdom environment minister under Prime Minister Tony Blair, has argued that its “an After you Claude situation” based on the fact that no country wants to be the “first in taking action to cut their greenhouse emissions for fear that the other government will fail to follow. So they find ways to stall, while their greenhouse gas output climbs steadily skywards” (Milliband in Financial Times) . This paper does not ignore other major problems of the Kyoto Protocol such as funding, but, instead will only look at what Milliband has identified as the problem with the Kyoto Protocol as mentioned above. First we will discuss the main problem he identifies and then we will look at the possible ways to resolve it.
Under the principle of the “common but differentiated responsibilities” the Kyoto Protocol is an agreement that binds 37 developed countries to reduce the emission of greenhouse gas. It was adopted on December 11th 1997 and entered into force in 2005. As a result of 150 industrial activity in the developed nations, the protocol commits them to stabilize the emissions through national initiatives and different means in meeting their targets: the Emission trading, clean development mechanisms and joint implementation (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, UNFCCC)
In the face of climate change, the richest countries in the world have been reluctant to reduce their greenhouses emissions and continue to undermine the goals and objective of the Kyoto Protocol. Milliband has argued that this is due to the fact that no country, the wealthiest countries in particular, will take the first steps of reducing its greenhouses gas emissions without any certainly that ...
... middle of paper ...
...Guide: Climate Change”. 2011. Web. 20 April 2011.
Harvey Fiona. “Lose- Lose: the Penalties of Acting Along Stall Collective Effort on Climate Change” Financial Times. 6 December 2006. Web. 20 April 2011
Karp, Larry and Zhao, Jinhua. “A Proposal for the Design of the Successor to the Kyoto Protocol”. Discussion Paper 08-03, Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements”. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. Cambridge MA. September 2008. Web. 20 April 2011.
Mccarthy, Shawn. “China, India, Brazil Must Pull Weight in Climate Change Accord, Baird Says” Globe and Mail. 3 December 2010. Web. 20 April 2011.
Rabe, Barry C. Beyond Kyoto: Climate Change Policy in Multilevel Governance Systems, “Governance” (2007) 20:3. 423-444. Print.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. “Kyoto Protocol”. Web. 20 April 2011.
It is obvious from the tone of this report that Michael Pollan really wants to stop climate change; he just doesn’t know how to make a lasting effect. Even so, he never ceases to pull at the readers’ heartstrings. The author does a great job at coercing the readers to jump on board; the only problem is there is no destination in mind. So, instead of inciting his readers to act out against this problem, Pollan leaves them dumbfounded and uncertain on how to
Gardiner, S.M, (2004) ‘Ethics and Global Climate Change’, Chicago Journals, Vol. 114 ( No. 3), Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/382247 [Accessed 12 March 2014]
The perhaps surprising answer is that in the U.S. policy process, climate change is not now a scientific issue. Although much of the controversy appears to revolve around scientific principles, political and economic forces actually dominate. In a sense, this is not surprising: in dealing with possible climate change, policymakers, stakeholders, and the public have to confront competing economic interests, significant political change, and such difficult issues as intergenerational equity, international competition, national sovereignty, and the role (and competence) of international institutions. What are the primary factors that determine policy outcomes on this complex subject? Detailing them vividly demonstrates how scientific knowledge interacts with the formulation of policy on a significant issue in the United States.
Hoffman, M. (2013) “Global Climate Change” in The Handbook of Global Climate and Environmental Policy
The Kyoto Protocol set by the United Nations allocates countries to offset their greenhouse gas emissions by growing what they lost, that is reforestation, and/or establishing a forest in a barren land, that is afforestation. Each country is allowed a certain quota that limits their greenhouse emissions. For companies that uses deforestation for commercial purposes must reforest the land they cut off to compensate for the loss. More often than not the land is left alo...
Quasem, AA, Jafaar, AH & Chamhuri, S 2010, 'Climate change mitigation and Policy Concern for Prioritization', International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management , vol. 2, No 4, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK.
Brown, P. (1998). Issues and Opportunities Emerging from the Kyoto Protocol [Special issue]. Climate, and Forests. Abstract retrieved March 30, 2004, from http://www.wri.org/wri/biodiv
Although it is often a topic for contention in politics, global warming over the span of several decades, has led to climate change, which has had an alarming impact globally. Climate change needs to ...
To sum up, the EU drawn attention on climate changes and has essential goals to help other regions and countries to change the world. According to the Kyoto Protocol, the EU and other countries have big dreams about changing climate in positive way. That how the EU manages to accomplish the defined aims on the Kyoto Protocol depends on the EU leaders and Europeans also on the major emitting countries and other powerful world’s countries which have essential impact on climate changes.
For these reasons, global warming stands as one of the most daunting policy issues facing our world today. This is compounded by the debate over the very existence of climate change. While countless sources of empirical evidence testify to the very real presence of climate change the world over, considerable denial of the phenomenon still exists. The argument has been made that evidence about climate change is a gross overstatement, or in some cases, a complete fabrication. Despite the evidence to the contrary, many interest groups with considerable political clout have successfully perpetuated the argument that documented changes in the environment are a product of natural cyclical changes in climate, and are not associated with human activities. However, even the acceptance of this particular brand of reality is no grounds for the disregard of environmental consciousness. Even if one accepts the premise that recent climate change is not resultant of human activity, the rationale behind environmental conservation remains ...
61). Moreover, it can also be seen “as presenting us with the largest collective action problem that humanity has ever faced, one that has both intra- and inter-generational dimensions” (Jamieson pg. 61). Thus, climate change will not only affect us but our children, and their children’s children, for generations to come. So is this it? Have we as humans sold our souls to the climate change devil? Is this something that we will always have to deal with and if so then why should we even bother trying to prevent it? Dale Jamieson philosopher and author of the book, Reason in a Dark Time, argues that we have sold our souls to the climate change devil and will be stuck with this problem for eternity. However, just because we are stuck with climate change, Jamieson argues, we should not give up on trying to slow down its effects. In addition to Jamieson the Federal Republic of Germany also believes that we are stuck with climate change and have developed their own solutions to help mitigate the effects. Throughout this paper I will present a descriptive and normative analysis to help address the environmental justice claims that both entities are making. I will then go on to show the instability of Dale Jamieson’s argument in both his descriptive and normative analysis through the development of my own
Conca, K., & Dabelko, G. D. (2010). Institutions of Global Environmental Governance. In K. Conca, & G. D. Dabelko, Green Planet Blues (pp. 117-124). Boulder: Westview Press
...together as one through the phenomena of globalization. China has taken advantage of this situation and has become the economic power of the world by being attractive for foreign production and investment. Though, Chinas economic boost has gone hand in hand with environmental concerns, and GHG emissions being the main one. A third of the world’s coal consumption is consumed by China, and these fossil fuels consequently have an impact on environment of China, but also surrounding countries. It has thus become obvious that Chinas issues are the world’s issues. Even though China does not want to become part of the Kyoto Protocol, it has set ambitious goals to reduce GHG’s. It already is the largest global investor in new renewable energies, and has set goals to battle climate change. However, officials have said that these are meant for reaching out to other countries.
Nowadays, we can see a lot of campaigns to reduce this humans’ contribution of greenhouse gases to atmosphere. These campaign’s missions are usually about reducing the energy that we use, convincing us to use recyclable energy, stopping the deforestation... These missions are all about mitigating to climate change. Climate change mitigation is the actions to limit the significant rate of long term climate change. In other words, climate change mitigation is all of the actions about lowering the humans’ greenhouse gas contribution to atmosphere. It is now too late for humans’ to prevent the effects of climate change, but these effects can be reduced in the future with mitigation. The most popular treaty, disenchant of humanity, is Kyoto Protocol. The main goal of Kyoto Protocol is reducing the human emitted greenhouse gases, in other word, mitigation. Also in ways that underlying national differences in GHG emissions, wealth, and capacity to make th...
Gray, Lousie. "'Crazy Ideas ' to Fight Global Warming Revealed by Scientists." The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group, 11 June 2009. Web. 25 May 2014.