Delivering effective quality improvement leadership within a healthcare organization consists of providing the microcosm with a toolbox to maintain a level of excellence and value. As leaders in the healthcare community, there are certain quality improvement factors that demonstrate strategic leadership philosophies. Being a member of this microcosm, I have determined several dynamic attributes that promotes excellence.
One of these quality mechanisms is known as the “Juran Trilogy” consisting of Quality Planning, Quality Control and Quality Improvement (Ransom, Joshi, Nash, & Ransom, 2008). The Juran Trilogy is a universal model sighted for a methodology to cross-functional management, which eliminates chronic waste in a system (Lewis, 2006). Juran believe in fitness of use that meant all members of a team should be involved in the effort to make the organizations services into fit for use. The ever-increasing demand for quality has forced organizational leaders to invest in resources for implementing Total Quality Management (TQM) strategies (Jha & Joshi, 2007).
Quality planning is the act of defining strategic goals and determining the expected outcomes regarding quality improvement. When planning a process, there needs to be an assessment of the customers and stakeholders needs in order to develop a system that is reliable as well as meets those specified needs. This process can sometimes be overlooked because quality improvement leaders want to study the problems without taking the time to define them. However, the Associates in Process Improvement developed a two-part model of improvement in which the researchers must answer the questions before they can take any action. The first part asks the three following quest...
... middle of paper ...
...agement (TQM) or business Excellence Strategy Implementation for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)–A Conceptual Study. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Quality.
Juran, J. M. (1986). The Quality Trilogy. Quality Progress, 19-24.
Lewis, B. (2006, March 15). The Juran Trilogy. Retrieved from Free Quality: http://www.freequality.org/documents/knowledge/Juran%20Trilogy%20Paper.pdf
Quality Gurus. (2014, January 25). Armand V. Feigenbaum. Retrieved from Quality Gurus: http://www.qualitygurus.com/gurus/list-of-gurus/armand-v-feigenbaum/
Ransom, E. R., Joshi, M. S., Nash, D. B., & Ransom, S. B. (2008). The Healthcare Quality Book Second Edition. Chicago: Health Administration Press.
Silow-Carroll, S., Alteras, T., & Meyer, J. A. (2007). Hospital quality improvement: Strategies and lessons from US hospitals. New York : The Commonwealth Fund.
SGH has been plagued with patient quality issues, therefore SGH finds itself in a situation which is inherently antithetical to the mission of the hospital. The costs of healthcare continue to rise at an alarming rate, and hospital boards are experiencing increased scrutiny in their ability, and role, in ensuring patient quality (Millar, Freeman, & Mannion, 2015). Many internal actors are involved in patient quality, from the physicians, nurses, pharmacists and IT administrators, creating a complex internal system. When IT projects, such as the CPOE initiative fail, the project team members, and the organization as a whole, may experience negative emotions that impede the ability to learn from the experience (Shepherd, Patzelt, & Wolfe, 2011). The SGH executive management team must refocus the organization on the primary goal of patient
With healthcare costs soaring in the United States, there is a continuous movement by hospitals and health systems towards reaching a number of patient and system oriented goals related to higher levels of quality, safety, and cost effectiveness. The Triple Aim captures the essential challenges and opportunities of this time within the U.S. Healthcare system. Formally introduce by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) in October 2007, the Triple Aim is theoretical model for optimizing health system performance. The initiative has three components: improving the patient experience of care (including quality and satisfaction), improving the health of populations, and reducing the per capita costs of health care (Berwick,
middle of paper ... ... International Journal for Quality in Healthcare, 25(3), 261-269. Retrieved from http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/3/261.short Smedley, B., Stith, A., & Nelson, A. (2003). The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary'.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2012), the average time patients spend in the U.S. emergency department (ER) before they can see a doctor has increased to 25% between 2003-2009. The main cause of longer wait times (WT) in the ER is overcrowding. Overcrowding has been found to be closely related to both subjective and objective patient satisfaction (Miro’ et al, 2003). Longer wait times in the ED is such an important issue because its consequences are detrimental not only to the ER patients, but also to providers. As a health care provider, decreasing patients’ WT in the ED is essential, although challenging, to improve patient’s health outcomes and increase patients’ satisfaction. Although it is a very challenging issue to tackle, hospitals that have initiated some quality improvement (QI) strategies are experiencing some positive outcomes in that area of care. The outcomes are measured by decreased waiting times, improved patients’ clinical outcomes and increased patients’ satisfaction.
Buchbinder, S.B., & Shanks, N. H. (2007). Introduction to Health Care Management. Sudbury, MA. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. Performance Improvement in Health Care. 5, 81-135.
Quality and quality improvement are important to any healthcare organization because these principles allows organizations to fulfill their missions more effectively. Defining what quality is may differ depending on whom is asking the question, as differing participates may have differing ideas about what quality means and why it is important. Being that quality is what unites patients and healthcare organizations, we can see the importance of quality and the need for strong policies and practices that improve patient care and their experience while receiving that care. Giannini (2015) states that this dualistic approach to quality utilizes separate measurements, conformance quality that measures patient outcomes against a set standard and Dinh et al. (2014) found that by employing a quality improvement system lowered trauma patient mortality by statically significant amount.
... is an abstract model that proposes an exploratory plan for health services and evaluating quality of health care. In accordance with the model, information about quality of care can be obtained from three categories: structure, process, and outcomes. In addition, not long ago The Joint Commission include outcomes in its accreditation valuations (Sultz, & Young, 2011, p. 378).
In the healthcare system, quality is a major driving compartment for patient outcomes. The quality of care reflects the outcomes in a patient’s care. According to Feeley, Fly, Walters and Burke (2010), “quality equ...
Nembhard, I. M., Alexander, J. A., Hoff, T. J., & Ramanujam, R. (2009). Why Does the Quality of Health Care Continue to Lag? Insights from Management Research. Academy Of Management Perspectives, 23 (1), 24-42. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2009.37008001
The World Health Organization outlines 6 areas of quality that help shape our definition of what makes quality care. Those areas are; (1) Effective: using evidence bases practice to improve health outcomes based on needs of individuals and communities. (2) Efficient: healthcare that maximizes resources and minimizes waste. (3) Accessible: timely care that is provided in a setting where the skills and resources are appropriate for the medical need and is geographically reasonable. (4) Acceptable/Patient-Centered: healthcare that considers individual needs, preferences, and culture. (5) Equitable: healthcare quality that does not vary because of race, gender, ethnicity, geographical location, or socioeconomically status. (6) Safe: healthcare that minimizes harm and risks to patients. (Bengoa, 2006)
This study is intended to further understand the impact of health care quality and cost
Understanding quality measurement is essential in improving quality. Teams need to be able to understand whether the changes being made are actually leading to improved care and improved outcomes. For data to have an impact on an improvement initiative, providers and staff must understand it, trust it, and use it. Health care organization must understand the measurement of quality provided by the Institute of Medicine (patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, compliance, efficiency, safe, timely, patient centered, and equitable. An organization cannot improve its performance if it does not know how it is performing. Measuring quality improvements is essential as it reflects the quality of care given by the providers and that by comparing performance
Even though Total Quality Management (TQM) has been replaced by other quality methodologies in many cases, organizations that have taken the long arduous journey to properly implement TQM benefited from it immensely [1]. While TQM may be perceived by many employees as just another passing fad that will soon fall by the wayside, the environmental conditions that exist within the organization will determine if TQM can be successfully implemented and take root. What is Total Quality Management (TQM)? TQM is a system of continuous improvement of work processes to enhance the organization’s ability to deliver high-quality products or services in a cost-effective manner [2].
William, R. (2009, August). Improving quality and value in the u.s. health care system. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2009/08/21-bpc-qualityreport
Quality is a word which has been used for a very long time, lots of books have been written about it, and many of the world's scientists have defined it in many different ways. In this research paper, I will emphasise the Quality Management System, why is it important? What is it used for? What is the importance of having a Quality Management System? Many people think implementing QMS costs a lot and all the benefit is a piece of paper which says that your company is certified in having QMS.