The Japanese Conquest Of America Analysis

1023 Words3 Pages

Summary of “The Japanese Conquest of American Opinion”
“The Japanese Conquest of American Opinion” by Montaville Flowers was written predominantly in an attacking manner towards “The American Japanese Problem” (1914). Montaville Flowers was a key supporter of anti-Japanese racism in California around the twentieth century. Montaville Flowers main objective in this excerpt was to attack “The American Japanese Problem”, this suggested racially non-discriminatory immigration laws, and was to oppose its author, Reverend Sidney L. Gulick.
In the beginning paragraph of the excerpt, Flowers asks, “What is a nation?” The word nation has two basic ideas from it. One has to do in relation with people, the other in relation to the land they reside on. …show more content…

Several of many is that all current leading civilizations were created by people of mixed races, or that there aren’t really any people of pure race. Gulick continued to make efforts to push his theory that race mixture has benefits. He was trying to prove that Japanese and Asians were compatible with the white race, Flowers believed his theological hypothesizes were proved wrong by science and was forgotten about by educated men. Gulick’s treatment of “social assimilation” blundered the theory of assuming, the evolutionary processes stops completely and does not continue in equal relation with psychic and social evolution. Flowers’ goes on and talks about the arguments of Mr. Gulick, his hypotheses were in a way old school, he gave a great effort to bring together his theories but couldn’t ignore the truths of modern science, led all the way into the end of trying to get Japanese into the U.S. and into social relations with white …show more content…

Gulick. He supported anti-Japanese racism. The quote I found very interesting was when Flowers asked, “What is a nation?” The way he described how land and people correlated was very intriguing. A nation is indeed like a big family, a family that is together in many different factors like blood, rank, government, and in peace.
This excerpt in many ways is true in my belief and values, a race in my opinion cannot really fully assimilate with another, there will always be that sense of culture or physical appearance entwined in that individual. You can try to fit in as much in a culture or race but you will never be fully accepted. I myself had conflicts with being of a different cultural descent from others trying as much as possible to fit in, but realized that could never be possible. I should embrace and be proud of my Nigerian heritage. Flowers made very good points in his excerpt, but the way he was criticizing and judging Reverend Sidney L. Gulick was in a way very harsh. The part of this excerpt that is most important is when Flowers emphasizes on nations; this made the correlation of race, people, and land very understandable. If any error or mishap becomes in between these factors conflict abruptly start to arise. Flowers main purpose for this excerpt is to make sure the reader understood

Open Document