Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
debate over capital punishment
the effectiveness of death penalty
ethical issue on capital punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: debate over capital punishment
The Issue of Capital Punishment in American Politics
In 2002, 71 persons in 13 States were executed -- 33 in Texas; 7 in
Oklahoma, 6 in Missouri; 4 each in Georgia and Virginia, 3 each in
Florida, South Carolina, and Ohio; 2 each in Alabama, Mississippi, and
North Carolina; and 1 each in Louisiana and California.
In 2003, 65 inmates were executed, 6 fewer than in 2002.
The death penalty has become a topic of serious controversy in recent
years. In particular, debate has been made over whether or not the
death penalty is an appropriate punishment for severe crimes such as
murder. Although the topic has been the subject of recent debate, it
is interesting to note that the basic opinions on both sides of the
argument date back to ancient times.
There are essentially two justifications for criminal punishment. The
first is retributive.
It is the idea that criminals deserve to be punished, that it is
morally right to punish wrong acts. The second justification is
utilitarian. Under this theory, punishment is justified because it
makes society better off in some way, perhaps by deterring potential
criminals, protecting society by segregating criminals, or by
reforming the criminal such that he/she can one day rejoin society.
I don’t believe either of these justifications for criminal punishment
supports the use of the death penalty. To take the utilitarian view
first, I would argue that capital punishment is an unsuccessful
deterrent. People still commit the crimes and figures of serious crime
haven’t gone down Secondly, I don’t think capital punishment is
necessary to segregate offenders and thereby protect society. A prison
and a life sentence can take care of that. Third, I think the
prospects for rehabilitation of capital offenders are quite slim, and
in any case, capital punishment certainly prevents whatever
possibilities there might otherwise be, cos you know, the guy or girls
dead anyway! The utilitarian theory of punishment would seem to
suggest that capital punishment is a bad idea. It is more costly than
lifelong confinement.
in 1976. Between that year and 1995, 314 inmates have been executed in the 37
Capital punishment results in the victims family gaining a greater sense of security, making sure the criminal is able to be punished to the highest degree for his crime, and honoring retribution. The issue of capital punishment has created a division
1188 people have been executed in the United States between the years of 1977 and 2009.[1] Most death penalty cases involve the execution of murders.[2] However, capital punishment can be applied to other crimes such as espionage and treason.[3]
Texas is responsible for more than a third of the executions in the country and has more executions than California, which is more populated. As a result of their rash behavior towards capital punishment, over six innocent people have been sentenced to death and later released since 1987. Out of the 521 people who were executed, many of them could have been rehabilitated back into society, but weren’t given a chance. I also doubt that all 521 crimes were deserving of the death penalty and that many of them weren’t looked into as deeply as they should have been.
Is the death penalty fair? Is it humane? Does it deter crime? The answers to these questions vary depending on who answers them. The issue of capital punishment raises many debates. These same questions troubled Americans just as much in the day of the Salem witch trials as now in the say of Timothy McVeigh. During the time of the Salem witchcraft trials they had the same problem as present society faces. Twenty innocent people had been sentenced to death. It was too late to reverse the decision and the jurors admitted to their mistake. The execution of innocent people is still a major concern for American citizens today.
If you are in a rush to attend a very important meeting and you can not find a parking spot, would you risk parking your car in a restricted zone if you knew the fee would only be 25 dollars? Would you reconsider taking the risk of parking your car there if the ticket would be 500 dollars? If the consequences of an action are severe, how many people would take the risk of taking that action? If the penalty to pay for taking other people’s lives was death, would fewer people take the risk of committing such a crime? Life is the most precious possession one holds. When another human brutally robs another of this gift, it is the most heinous of all crimes. It is only justice if the punishment fits the crime committed, and for murder, the only punishment fit is the death penalty, therefore, the capital punishment should be retained in all the States as a means of justice and a clear message for potential criminals out there not to follow.
This country is determined to prove that killing someone under certain circumstances is acceptable, when in all reality there can be no rationalization for the taking of another human life. Killing is murder. It is as simple as that. There have been so many different controversies surrounding this debate that often, the issues become clouded in false statistics and slewed arguments. The basic fact remains that killing is morally and ethically wrong. This fact does not disappear by simply changing the term "murder" to "capital punishment". The act is still the taking of a life. On these grounds, the death penalty should be abolished.
3. At the close of 1999, Texas has the most prisoners on death row (39), followed by California (31), and Alabama and Florida (25 each).
Capital punishment, otherwise known as “The Death Penalty,” has been around for many years and has been the cause of death for over twelve hundred inmates since 1976 (“Death Penalty Information Center”), but is the Death Penalty really beneficial to the American public? This question is in the back of many people’s minds, and has left many questioning the meaning of the punishment. The death penalty targets murderers or high profile cases. Some say that the death penalty should apply to those who murder, rape, or abuse human beings such as children, or women. The significance of the penalty is to teach these criminals that there are laws that must be followed. In a figurative sense, it is to teach those potential wrongdoers a lesson. By examining the facts around us, we can gain a greater sense of security, and a greater understanding of what the death penalty can accomplish, all while assessing the high-quality aspects that the penalty has to offer.
The death penalty, ever since it was established, has created a huge controversy all throughout the world. Ever since the death penalty was created, there have been people who supported the death penalty and those who wanted to destroy it. When the death penalty was first created the methods that were used were gruesome and painful, it goes against the Eighth Amendment that was put in place many years later. The methods they used were focused on torturing the people and putting them through as much pain as possible. In today’s society the death penalty is quick and painless, it follows the Eighth Amendment. Still there are many people who are against capital punishment. The line of whether to kill a man or women for murder or to let him or her spend the rest one’s life in prison forever will never be drawn in a staight.
Capital punishment is a form of taking someone 's life in order to repay for the crime that they have committed. Almost all capital punishment sentences in the United States of America have been imposed for homicide since the 1970 's. Ever since the reinstatement after 38 years of being banned, there has been intense debate among Americans regarding the constitutionality of capital punishment. Critics say that executions are violations of the “cruel and unusual punishment” provision of the Eighth Amendment. Some capital punishment cases require a separate penalty trial to be made, at which time the jury reviews if there is the need for capital punishment. In 1982, the first lethal injection execution was performed in Texas. Some other common methods of execution used are electrocution, a firing squad, and lethal gas. In recent years, the US Supreme Court has made it more difficult for death row prisoners to file appeals. Nearly 75 percent of Americans support the death sentence as an acceptable form of punishment. The other fourth have condemned it. Some major disagreements between supporters and non-supporters include issues of deterrence,
It is the firm belief and position here that committing such a crime as murder is punishable by death. Americans should take a position for anyone on death row, to be executed sooner rather than later.
The death penalty has been part of the American judicial system since the country’s founding [1]. Most people see the death penalty as the fairest way to punish those who have killed, because, in the words of Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, “the instinct for retribution is part of the nature of man.” I do agree that the deliverance of justice is an important factor in any public policy. However, it is also important to consider the more pragmatic aspects, like the cost to the state. It is possible that the financial cost could be outweighed by the societal benefit. However, upon researching the death penalty, one would discover that the cost of capital punishment is unreasonably high, particularly in the state of California, especially when we consider how rarely the death sentence is actually implemented. In times like these, times of economic turmoil and scarce financial resources, the state cannot afford a system that is so expensive and also so rarely utilized. I believe that, in the state of California, the death penalty is overly expensive and so rarely implemented that it should be abolished.
The question regarding whether the United States should implement the death penalty as a form of punishment is a heated issue in American politics. The topic is so divisive because it deals with death, which is permanent. Life is valued in every society, and when life is taken away, emotions rise. Most human beings maintain a strong underlying fear of dying, so they wish to prevent their own death, especially their murder, at any cost. Furthermore, since crime is a prevalent problem in the U.S., Americans yearn for a successful way to reduce the homicide rate. However, most Americans do not favor the use of the death penalty when other options, such as life in prison without parole plus restitution, are presented (Dieter). By comparing the empirical and moral claims of the arguments in favor and against the use of the death penalty, we suggest that the presidential candidate take a cautiously anti-death penalty stance.
"Executions by State in the U.S.” AmnestyUSA.com. Amnesty USA, March 2010. Web. 1 March 2010.