Immigration Persuasive Essay

1548 Words4 Pages

With the commonly known idea of the “American Dream”, America and it’s appeal has not diminished in any way. Those who emigrate their country of origin, come to the United States in hope of a better quality of life. This includes employment, more rights, and even better healthcare. However, when immigrants cross the border illegally, it is seen as criminal activity and is not tolerated. Recently, Arizona passed a new immigration bill that is seen as the harshest in the country. The bill not only targets the overall idea of immigration, but through its execution, it also addresses the issue of racial profiling. In comparison, Obama and his administration are less than strict and implement a more lenient plan for illegal immigrants. With the …show more content…

Their issues concerning alien immigrants range from economic to political . As a self-proclaimed minuteman, Frank was featured in the show “30 Days”. His views opposing illegal immigration were made very clear as it was also shown that he would be living with an illegal immigrant family, the Gonzales’, for thirty days. Frank argues that these immigrants not only “tear apart the nation” but also they’re taking away jobs from American citizens. Yet with more illegal immigrants becoming present in the United States, they have joined together to protest for amnesty. In this context, amnesty means forgiveness and like others, Frank is not willing to give it. Taking away employment opportunities also made Frank even more unwilling. The family’s main, but not steady, source of income came from the father’s labor jobs during the day. As an illegal immigrant, he was not able to look for a steady job and therefore was severely underpaid. Though this shows that people are still willing to give jobs to those deemed as “criminals”. This becomes a prime example for why Arizona’s strict legislation targets those who willingly hire illegal immigrants. Unlike those who are willing to help the immigrants, others have become frustrated. While they pay taxes and immigrants don’t, citizens see this as inexcusable. To support her stance, Brewer made it clear in “US v. Arizona” that, “allowing 80,000 illegals to claim public benefits will blow a hole in Arizona’s budget”, thus “Arizona voters have expressed their will in this matter in at least two votes, and indeed, elected Brewer largely based on the idea that they didn’t want to pay for benefits for illegals.” This shows that the bill for the law was not solely created from a legislator’s point of view. Those who are citizens do not condone the illegal behavior and want to take action. Seeing that this has been expressed in two votes in Arizona,

Open Document