Exploring the Gun Control Debate: An Historical Perspective

1530 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The controversy of the second amendment

In light of recent tragic events, gun control is once again an important topic of conversation. Both left and right wing individuals attempt to sway society towards their sides of the argument. These debates almost always follow the occurrence of a major attack on innocent persons. The questions are always the same. How did the individual obtain a firearm? What measurements are in place to keep this from happening again? Why does the average person need to own an “assault rifle’’? Why don’t we just ban everyone in the country from owning guns? In order to get a better understanding of the topic of gun control, we will have to explore these major questions. On December 15, 1791, congress implemented the Second Amendment. “A well-regulated …show more content…

There was a confrontation between the Clanton-McLaury gang and the sheriffs of the small town, the Earp brothers. Tombstone had a law stating all guns needed to be turned into the sheriff’s office before entering the municipality. After refusing to relinquish their firearms, there was a short and bloody firefight, leaving three of the five gang members dead and the two sheriffs, including their friend, Doc Holiday, wounded (The Earp-Holliday Trial: An Account). Gun free zones are perfect examples of the saying, “If guns are outlawed, the only outlaws will have guns.” The shootout at the OK corral isn’t the only example of violence in a gun free zone. According to a report from January 1998 to December 2015, by the Crime Prevention and Research Center, 96.2% of mass public shooting have occurred in Gun Free Zones vs 3.8% in places where guns are allowed (CPRC). This report shows incidents where 4 or more people were killed and excludes shootings related to gang or drug …show more content…

One such case is the Aurora theater shooting. Without too going into too many details, the shooter used an AR platformed rifle to murder twelve people and injured sixty others. Not long after the shooting, most media outlets ran the phrase “civilian assault rifle” in stories revolving around gun violence. This coined phrase stigmatized the firearm owner’s community. The common misconception that all AR platformed rifles are fully automatic weapons of destruction. In fact, AR does not stand for “Assault Rifle” or “automatic rifle” like most would think. It actually stands for ArmaLite Rifle, after the company that developed it in the 1950s (nssf.org). These rifles are semi-automatic (one round fired for every pull of the trigger) and are classified as modern sporting rifles. Although they may look like their military predecessors, their uses primarily range from competition target practice to big game hunting. Knowing this small distinction can help many individuals on both sides of the argument form their own rational viewpoint. Conversely, even with this knowledge, there are still some who will argue for ultimately banning these firearms because of their destructive nature. Are AR styled rifles really responsible for so much violence we are led to believe? According to a report from the FBI’s Uniformed Crime Reporting, of the 11,961 murders that were reported

Show More
Related

  • Gun Control versus Gun Rights

    1430 Words  | 3 Pages

    In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity... Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to call on the government to take action. By enacting more laws and stricter control, these people not in favor of guns feel society would be better safer.

    Read More

  • Should the Government Ban Assault Weapons?

    954 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over the last decade or so, the United States of America has been shaken by an epidemic of terrifying mass shootings, devastating slayings of unexpecting victims, and unnerving annihilations of the innocent. There is no specific target, no explicitly sought-out group, nor definite individual. From a classroom of first-graders, to a crowded movie theatre, to a U.S. Naval yard, the location seems at most, random, other than that it is almost always a public place. The perpetrators responsible for these horrific murders also vary, and often surprise those who thought they knew them. However, while the occurrences of mass shootings are unpredictable and always shocking, most have one thing in common: the use, or rather misuse, of assault weapons-automatic or semiautomatic military style rifles. To ensure the safety, security, and well-being of the people of the United States, the government should ban assault weapons.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Is Not Enough

    1327 Words  | 3 Pages

    “I don’t believe people should be able to own guns. (Obama)” This said prior to Obama’s presidency, in the 1990’s, is still a topic that is constantly questioned today. Many American’s feel the need to seek ownership of weapons as a source of protection; While others believe that private ownership of guns will do nothing more but heighten the rate of violence due to people taking matters into his or her own hands. Philosophy professor Jeff McMahan agrees with Obama’s statement in regard to the ownership of guns. In his New York Times editorial titled “When Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough,” McMahan provides evidence to support his theory of the dangers that quickly follow when allowing the community to own guns legally. McMahan, throughout the text, shows responsible reasoning and allows the reader the opportunity to obtain full understanding and justifies his beliefs properly.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    1146 Words  | 3 Pages

    After tragic incidents like Columbia or Virginia Tech has generated a huge debate on gun control . The explosion of such events has trivialized the issue of gun control. , This is very dangerous , as this is not a trivial matter. The decisions should never be based on fear or panic . Gun control is as complex as the concept of freedom issue and therefore, this issue requires further analysis.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gun rights are the source of much controversy in today’s society. People have been skeptic after the multiple shootings that happened in the past few years. Recently, the NRA has been under constant threat by Congress. Background checks are not effective as planned. In order to keep the gun rights, changes need to be made in order to prevent gun control from being created.

    Read More

  • Gun Violence: Right Or Wrong?

    228 Words  | 1 Pages

    Tiffany Hsu, a author for “The new york Times”, In the article “Bank of america to stop financing makers of military style guns”, Tiffany argues that gun violence is wrong and that the people who start it all should solve the problem. First Tiffany says that Bank of America will stop lending money to gun manufacturers that make military-inspired firearms for civilian use. Next she then goes on to to inform that the AR-15-style rifles that have been used in multiple mass shootings” are a huge problem and are used in mass shooting. Finally Tiffany goes on to say The bank will wind down its relationships with the companies that choose to continue making AR-15 style rifles and similar guns. Through the use of pathos the author makes the reader

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gun control is an issue that has been debated over in the United States for years. It has recently become more of a hot issue, due to random gun violence sweeping the nation and thousands of guns on victims such as Trevon Martin, school children and movie goers end up wounded( physically and mentally) or dead. The growing concern of gun violence have persuaded many government officials and American citizens to support heavier gun control laws. However, many government officials and citizens still are unwilling to support stricter gun control. Which is solely due to the Second Amendment, which states, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms." As a part of the US Constitution, it supports the individuals rights to own firearms and causes people to feel like there is no need to have stricter gun laws: however, I disagree with the Second Amendment to an extent. The government shouldn't be allowed to restrict the ownership of guns to the point it is hard to obtain a gun, nor should it let us have excessive amounts of freedom with guns. I truly feel there needs to be a middle ground in which people can be content with guns.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States makes up for 5% of the world’s population, but accounted for 31% of mass shootings around the globe between the years of 1966 and 2012 (Christensen). In 2015 alone, there were 372 mass shootings in the United States, incidents in which four or more people were injured or killed. The number of gun murders per capita in the United States was 2.9 per 100,000 people in 2012, a rate nearly 30 times that of the United Kingdom (BBC). These kinds of statistics have escalated the debate of gun control – if it is the government’s duty to more strictly regulate firearms – throughout American politics. The United States Congress in 1994, in response to a school shooting that killed 5 children and injured dozens via AK-47 assault rifle,

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    1129 Words  | 3 Pages

    Recently, state legislators and court rulings have made it possible for students on certain college campuses to carry concealed weapons. This is due in part to the shootings that have happened over the years and the increasing threat of unknown enemies. However, the issue has come into question and concern on college campuses. Some argue that guns on campus should be a choice left up to the individual, after all it is their 2nd Amendment right. Others would say that college campuses are a place of learning, a place that does not require firearms at all. Lastly, there are those who say that stricter gun laws would prevent crimes and shootings.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

    1832 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, the citizens have the right to possess and bear arms. This is still a big issue in today 's society as we are in the 21st century the use of guns has changed significantly. The fact that crime has increased and that the right to own a handgun has been a hot issue have made many Americans question whether gun and crime are directly related. The issue of gun control, in an attempt to reduce crime rates in The United States has also been a topic of discussion that seems to have many people divided on the issue. Even though many people believe gun control violates the right to bear arms which is in the constitution, Americans know that more strict rules need to be put in place to because of

    Read More

  • Gun Control Controls Nothing

    2564 Words  | 6 Pages

    More and more frequently, we are saddened by the news of mass shootings. Whether it takes place in a school or public area, these shootings are both disastrous and mortifying. Families begin to feel anger and sadness, and demand immediate justice. Although these terrible events continue to happen, there have been no significant steps taken towards the reduction in the number of weapons; specifically assault rifles. This leads one to question do we need to ban the right to possess such weapons? If the possession of these weapons is not made illegal, we run the risk of another attack. While there is no questioning the severity of these mass shootings, a ban on assault rifles is not the answer because they are not the cause of such events, and it is a constitutional right to own them.

    Read More

  • Should Gun Control Laws be Stricter?

    1343 Words  | 3 Pages

    Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says “The term gun control as it is used in the United States refers to any action taken by the federal government or by state or local governments to regulate, through legislation, the sale, purchase, safety, and use of handguns and other types of firearms by individual citizens.” According to this idea gun control laws should be stricter and people should not be able to have access to guns easily. However, there are many other people who believe this idea is not a good solution and never help. This essay will demonstrate for and against views about the topic. People who agree with this idea consider: firstly, stricter laws will reduce violence and gun control means crime control. Secondly, some research shows people with gun are more at risks of getting shot. Thirdly, guns can always be misused by their owners and finally, stricter law is the best and the faster way to control crime and make community safe. While opponents say first of all, guns are necessary for people safety and protection. Secondly, guns are not the only tools for killing and violence; there are other weapons too and finally, gun ownership is human rights.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Does NOT Reduce Crime

    2312 Words  | 5 Pages

    Crime rate has steadily lowered as more guns enter the private market. There is no single answer to end the debate on gun control. Many variables must be examined, but the evidence presented cannot be ignored. Gun control does not end violence, but makes the law-abiding citizens more vulnerable. In the 1878 Arkansas case of Wilson v. State, a judge stated, “Common sense dictates that inanimate objects, such as guns, are not responsible for human behavior.

    Read More

  • Should Assault Weapons Be Banned

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    “To gun control advocates, the numbers show for much stricter laws”. (Rhee). Gun control advocates also say that assault weapons should only be used by police and military and absolutely need to be out of the hands of criminals and mentally unstable people. (Rhee). In a study on gun crimes involving assault weapons during the federal ban found that the crime declined between 17 and 72 percent in the selected six cities, Anchorage, Baltimore, Boston, Miami, Milwaukee and St. Louis, but they found no decline in crimes committed with other guns. (Fallis).

    Read More

  • Gun Ownership: A Risk-Return Analysis

    587 Words  | 2 Pages

    Guns are used in most homicides and represents 11,101 deaths, about 70 percent of total homicides. Take for instance the year 2011 one of our nation’s worst years for gun violence more than 15,953 innocent people fell victim to gun violence. A report conducted by “The Washington Post” reported that since 1982 there have been a total of 61 mass killings that involved the use of a gun. There was no conclusive evidence that assault rifle was used, but it is safe to say when assault rifles are used many people

    Read More

More about Exploring the Gun Control Debate: An Historical Perspective

Open Document