Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
history of washing machine essay
history of washing machine essay
the washing machine today essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: history of washing machine essay
The invention of the washing machine (as a designed object) along with other household technologies, created more work for the everyday woman in the 1900’s. In this paper I will explore the Theoretical and historical significance of gender in the use, and creation of the washing machine, and the capitalistic gain that followed. Insight into the overlooked critical design of the washing machine will help explore the creation of the modern housewife, and the environmental implications in this historical design.
Housework in the pre-industrial period is essentially the maintenance of survival located in the home. Since very few people worked for wages, the household was were most supplies were produced. Food, candles, clothes, and the tools
…show more content…
First, there is a shift from production of goods in the home for commerce outside the home to consumption of goods from outside the home within the home. The goods and services she notes are in the food, clothin,g and health care system. Increasingly, food and clothes are purchased. Utility companies shift resources the opposite direction rather than having to bring fuel and water into the home, they set up infrastructures for these resources to be provided to the home: water, gas, electricity and oil. Transportation also becomes the job of the house worker, as delivery becomes less and less common. Commercial and social enterprises that could have produced differing arrangements of goods and labor failed. Commercial laundries, boarding houses and apartment hotels were all attempts to relieve homes of the most intensive labor activities which was laundry and food prep. The washing machine was a perfect example. The washing machine is a designed appliance for cleaning clothes. It uses a combination of a mechanical process and a chemical process to get the clothes clean. Most home-use washing machines consist of a vertical barrel mounted on top of an agitator. The agitator is able to rotate the barrel clockwise or counter-clockwise, and to spin the barrel at low or high speeds. Water is introduced into the barrel at the beginning of a wash cycle, along with a user determined amount of detergent or bleach. …show more content…
We look at the washing machine as this sought after commodity both in the past and present, there for mystifying it. Although it is not a magical device, it is a product of our creation and labor. The electricians that make these machines do not directly relate to each other as workers, but instead by their products. They are able meet in the market place and are exchanged between one another. When we look at a washing machine we don’t think about the work that went into create them, all we see is products standing in relation to one another as values. There is this a social power to a product like the washing machine, but not to the relation of the workers who created it. When we buy a commodity we are only having an experience between the product and us. We are blind to the social relations behind these interactions. A social relation between people and things is called reification. Marx explains how in a capitalistic society things are able to take on the characteristics of people. A housewife could set a value for a washing machine at twelve hundred dollars, this amount doesn’t come from the machine itself , you will not find twelve hundred dollars within the machine. This figure comes from the relation of the machine to all other commodities on the market at the time. These commodities are material forms of a social
The Industrial Revolution in America began to develop in the mid-eighteen hundreds after the Civil War. Prior to this industrial growth the work force was mainly based in agriculture, especially in the South (“Industrial Revolution”). The advancement in machinery and manufacturing on a large scale changed the structure of the work force. Families began to leave the farm and relocate to larger settings to work in the ever-growing industries. One area that saw a major change in the work force was textile manufacturing. Towns in the early nineteen hundreds were established around mills, and workers were subjected to strenuous working conditions. It would take decades before these issues were addressed. Until then, people worked and struggled for a life for themselves and their families. While conditions were harsh in the textile industry, it was the sense of community that sustained life in the mill villages.
As early as the nineteen fifties women were identified and targeted as a market. In a consumer culture the most important things are consumers. Advertisers convinced homemakers that in order to be a “good” wife and mother you must have their products and appliances to keep a clean and perfect home. The irony of this ploy is that consumers must have money to buy, and so trying to improve their quality as homemakers, off into the workforce women went. This paradox left women ...
This article talks about the growing movement of hiring maids for household work. This article starts off as being about gender inequality, but then turns into an issue of class and moral standards. The author explains her own experiences of house cleaning. She also describes how “wealthier class’s children are being raised with the attitude”. (Barbara Ehrenreich) That the people that clean up after them are “lower” than everyone else. Additionally she talks about how the hiring of house hold workers will increase and eventually move on to the middle class homes.
In Marx’s opinion, the cause of poverty has always been due to the struggle between social classes, with one class keeping its power by suppressing the other classes. He claims the opposing forces of the Industrial Age are the bourgeois and the proletarians. Marx describes the bourgeois as a middle class drunk on power. The bourgeois are the controllers of industrialization, the owners of the factories that abuse their workers and strip all human dignity away from them for pennies. Industry, Marx says, has made the proletariat working class only a tool for increasing the wealth of the bourgeoisie. Because the aim of the bourgeoisie is to increase their trade and wealth, it is necessary to exploit the worker to maximize profit. This, according to Marx, is why the labor of the proletariat continued to steadily increase while the wages of the proletariat continued to steadily decrease.
Women, particularly homemakers, had a special interest in conservation and keeping their environment clean. In the days in which laundry was done by hand, smoke in the air made such a task much more difficult than necessary. Keeping clothes and jewelry clean and food adequately protected was nearly impossible for housewives (76). Of course, women were already doing their part to conserve and not be wasteful, simply in order to save money. The article from the Ladies’ Home Journal points out that wives and mothers have unknowingly been doing their part to conserve Earth’s resources for generations (32-33). These are things such as saving paper and string from a package, gathering seeds, using rainwater for doing the laundry, and feeding table scraps to pets and other animals (32-33). Housewives were already practicing conservation on a small scale, and were virtually unaware that much the same thing was going on at a national level. Mothers teach their children not to be wasteful, and the same could be said of the government and environmentalist groups teaching their people not to be wasteful.
Some people might think that most women should be at home and do housework, or find some easy tasks because it is not possible for women to work long-hours and then take care of their home. In China, women stay at home and do housework and it is really simple. Without the permission of their husband, they cannot go out to find a job because ...
Tilly, Louise A. "Women, Women's History, And The Industrial Revolution." Social Research 61.1 (1994): 115. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 4 May 2014.
Suppose a world without all the technological advances available to people today, this was the world during the early 18th century that a large portion of the American people had to live in. This means life rapidly changed with the introduction of the Industrial Revolution. This period ignited a change in the way previous generations had manufactured goods, which was by man power and horsepower. The production method by hand usually took a considerably great amount of time and energy and was only effective in the cases of small scale production. Take for instance, family oriented businesses such as textile and agricultural produce. “The whole family took part in cloth making. One daughter brushed the cotton between two carding brushes, to straighten the fibers into roving bands of unspun fibers. The mother and older daughter did the spinning while the father weaved cloth on a band loom.” Every person within a family had a specific job that would be a vital contribution t...
According to Jeanne Boydston, the relationship between home and work in the antebellum America was very strong, especially for women. Work, for both men and women, had direct correlations to the household. During the antebellum period, women were basically paid household workers. According to “The Pastoralization of Housework,” a wife’s basic housework would average around $150 per year, if
Much of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto discusses the relationship between how a capitalist society produces its’ goods and how this affects the social structure of the society. Throughout the manifesto, Marx used the term mode of production to refer to how a given society structures its’ economic production, it also refers to how a society produces and with what capital the society produces. Human capital plays a large part in Marx’s communist manifesto, concerning himself with the relations of production, which refers to the relationship between those who own the means of production (bourgeoisie) and those who do not own the fruit of their labor (proletariat). This is where Marx believes that one can find the causes of conflict, asserting history evolves through the mode of production. The constant evolution of the mode of production toward a realization of its’ full potential productivity capacity, creates dissensions between the classes of people, which in capitalism, are defined by the modes of production (owners and workers). Marx believes that one such dissension is that since Capitalism is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production, and entities within a capitalistic economy produce property to be exchanged to stay competitive, these entities are forced to drive the wage level for its’ labor as low as possible so as to stay competitive. In turn, the proletariat must create means with which they can keep the interests of the bourgeoisie in check, trying to avoid being exploited to the point of extirpation. Marx holds that this example shows the inherent conflicting nature of the social infrastructure of production, which will in turn give rise to a class struggle culminating in the overthrow ...
At the beginning of the 1800’s most laborers worked at home. The family functioned together as a working unit for the common good of all its members. Children would stay at home to help until they got married. They usually did not become contributing members until they reached the age of ten. Girls started somewhat earlier because they would be assisting their mothers with the domestic economy(Gaskell, 91).
During the 1760s the industrial revolution was about to begin in Great Britain. Before the industrial revolution started people did manufacturing in their house with hand tools and small basic machinery. Once the Industrial Revolution started most of the at home work stop and factory work had began. The industrial Revolution had improved life for people, not only did it improve life but it also improved banking, transportation and communication systems.
In the late 1800s, the years following the Civil War particularly, there was an era of industrial growth which led to a growth in the working class. This growth gave rural families a dream of a better life, so many moved to cities for steady and reliable jobs just to be disappointed. They were met with jobs that required long hours, little pay, and unsafe working conditions. Due to the awful pay even children as young as three sometimes had to work and often met injuries and death. (Childhood Lost: Child Labor During the Industrial Revolution) Even those families who did not live or move to the city were required to work long hard hours on the farms, and it was not uncommon for young children to have many chores to help the family. Mornings usually started around 5:00am with the mother starting breakfast and the father doing whatever hard labor he needed for the rest of the day to go smoothly. The chores for the children were split up based on gender; while the girls worked on preparing meals, and doing basic chores around the house the boys helped their fathers out on the field. (B) This made a vast difference in how children developed as compared to today. Due to how much work children had to do to help their families many of them didn’t have much time to play or go to school, in fact it was not uncommon for children to drop out
Back when my parents were little, it was not uncommon for the wife to stay at home and tend to the housework. Being a housewife requires certain skills for cleaning a house. Three rooms in particular are the kids’ room, the bathroom and the kitchen, all require certain cleaning products, equipment, and processes to clean properly.
It was only 50 years ago that we began to have wonderful labor-saving devices to help accomplish all the tasks that collectively constituted the perfect home environment. Sometimes it has the effect of removing all the reasons that everything cannot be done all the time and so results in more work rather than less, but few of us can imagine living without washing machines, vacuum cleaners or dishwashers—or electricity, for that matter.