Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Governmental control of the Internet
Governmental control of the Internet
internet censorship government restrictions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Governmental control of the Internet
Question 1:
The Internet is a global network that uses the standard Internet protocol to tie billions of devices all over the world together. When one uses the Internet they are entering a whole new world of endless possibilities, they have access to numerous amounts of content and information. It is a tool for communication and it gives people the opportunity to learn and educate themselves on different topics such as history or politics etc. Unlike other technologies, the Internet can be bended and molded into whatever we want. We can use it to connect people of different cultures and countries around the world. It was created to connect people from all walks of life and diverse backgrounds. The Internet has the potential to globalize the world however certain countries governments have placed restrictions or “firewalls” so that their citizens only have access to what they want them to see. The Internet was created to be a force for freedom, where people could voice and share their opinions on certain topics, but now it seems that the Internet is anything but a form of freedom for these countries.
People believe that the Internet is a true form of freedom, but individuals in other countries have a much different opinion. Internet users in china are isolate from the main network. Chinas government has placed a firewall on and they filter all “unwanted” Internet martial that could cause any national unrest. It is a complete double standard, the Chinese people are allowed and even encouraged to use the Internet for a long as they want, however all international websites are restricted and whatever a citizen posts on line can be monitored. The Chinese government thinks that by blocking all international sites they are supp...
... middle of paper ...
...n limited authorization to regulate the Internet only in times of need, which again means that they should only have control over the regulations of the internet if it poses a great threat to their organization and internet users as a whole. There are problems on the Internet, such as cyber bullying and minor website hackings, but no government or organization need to get involved, these problems should be dealt with by the people themselves.
Overall the Internet should be a free network. However to make the Internet a safer place their may be some regulations implanted like stronger age restriction laws and validation laws to make online transactions safer. There is no need for governments or different organizations to get involved over small situations, they should only be allowed to intervene when it is a national or even global threat or crisis.
Technology is expanding everyday. Our society has grown and expanded and has become extremely powerful because of new technologies. People are learning how to use computers in place of their tasks. The Internet is a prime example is of expanding technology. One can obtain yesterday's and today's news, listen to music, talk to a friend over seas, view pornography, and countless other things in the privacy of one's home via the Internet. There is no way to really regulate what is on the Internet. Essentially, the government has no place on the Internet. This world is free of from laws. As society moves closer to advanced technology, the government becomes removed. There is no way for them to regulate society's actions once everything is computer based. In Snow Crash, Stephenson creates the Metaverse. In this society no laws exist.
This is a lot to ask, and many people are concerned about "Big Brother" controlling our communications, and they argue that the Internet should be free to regulate itself. However, there must be regulation on the Internet. The Internet allows the freest mode of expression in human history. Anyone is a publisher. With this great freedom, comes great responsibility. The framers of the Constitution never imagined the Internet, but they did imagine principles which should continue to guide us into the electronic frontier. Principles of the Commerce Clause and the First Amendment must continue to apply in the realm of cyberspace.
The internet was created for the cold war, in the event that the U.S. were attacked, there would be no communication among the nations leaders, because traditional communication would be disrupted by a nuclear blast. Since that time, the internet survived only though commercialization, the original form of the internet was scrapped when the cold war ended. Now, with this medium in the hands of anyone who wants to pay for service, the Internet has exploded with controversial materials that some people think should be censored. When I started this project, I asked the question should the Internet be regulated and if so, how and why? First we'll look at why the Internet needs regulation, Then how would our government go about doing so? There are several issues that are controversial with the internet. There is pornography, racism, and hate material floating around out there that is accessiable to children all too easily. For the purposes of this paper, I will only discuss the pornography issue, since talking about all of the censorship issues would take more than a short research paper to discuss.
...t those that seek to censor some of the information found on the internet. Nunziato (2009) concludes that in order to fulfill the Internet’s promise of being “the most participatory market-place of mass speech that this country-and indeed the world- has seen,” the companies that serve as gatekeepers for free expression need to be regulated to ensure that they fairly administer any censorship such that it “does not detract from the free speech values that are necessary to facilitate the public discussion and informed deliberation that democratic government presupposes and the First Amendment requires”.
The aim of this study is to determine the differences between the Internet in China and the United States. China was chosen due to the restrictive and closely scrutinized nature of its Internet, in contrast to the internet in United States which has significantly more freedom and protected by the freedom of speech and expression. This study will include:
The internet has been one of the most influential technological advancements of the twenty-first century. It is in millions of homes, schools, and workplaces. The internet offers not only a way of communicating with people around the world, but also a link to information, shopping, chatting, searching, and maps. This freedom to be anyone and to "go" anywhere right from the comfort of home has become a cherished item. However, there is always a down side to every up. Because of the freedom to post anything and access anything on the internet, the issue of regulation has arisen; for example, what should and should not be allowed on the internet? Who has the right to regulate this space that we cherish for its freedom?
"In the year 2018, the Internet has now reached a global scale of immense proportions; just in the United States, it is now in almost 99% of our homes. Thus, this influence raises the question, how far should the government be involved in monitoring the internet? With the most recent Net Neutrality issue, the government has now become tangled with constant debate about free market. However, because of society’s personal involvement with the network, it is my firm belief that the government should be involved to some minimal degree when it comes to protecting the people’s privacy.
In short, I believe the internet is the new revolution in communication, but the fact of its mass-connections that span the entire world; it would be like trying to run a government of trillions of people, with thousands of languages, and millions of different cultures to boot. In order to truly censor the internet, the only fool-proof, absolute solution would be to destroy it, which would deny the very tool and breakthrough in technology that has allowed the entire world to for once communicate, if not agree, on a universally accepted level.
"I believe that it is not a duty of the government to monitor internet content, unless there is an extreme circumstance where the public would be in danger. It is the first amendment right of the people to utilize their own free speech. This is very important, and we will always need to keep in mind what was intended when the Bill of Rights was created. When we start to limit free speech, we are hindering the speed and quality of ideas that could otherwise be spread very quickly and efficiently. Considering events such as the leaks that state that “The NSA is turning the internet into a total surveillance system”, the government is considering everyone using the internet a potential suspect, completely ignoring the fact that the people of the United States should always be considered innocent until proven guilty. If we are always on guard about having to word things the
Internet is a powerful tool that allows users to collaborate and interact with others all over the world conveniently and relatively safely. It has allowed education and trade to be accessed easily and quickly, but all these benefits do not come without very taxing costs. This is especially true when dealing with the likes of the Internet. Countries in the European Union and Asia have realized this and have taken action against the threat of net neutrality to protect their citizens, even at the cost of online privacy. Internet censorship is required to protect us from our opinions and vices. Every country should adopt Internet censorship and regulation since it improves society by reducing pornography, racism/prejudice, and online identity theft.
"The U.S government-Federal, State and Local- has a limited duty to monitor the internet for numerous reasons. They can violate constitutional rights and privacy. There can be serious miscommunication issues, and profiling issues.
The first reason the American government should not regulate the internet is because of cost. The government would to spend money on the equipment to regulate the internet. According to Robert McDowell from the Washington post "Paired with the amount of money that would have to be spent on creating filters and sifting through the almost infinite amount of information available would be staggering" (3). This would just something else the government would have to spend the countries money on. This would take people to go through the internet and the
Most of the Internet regulation is imposed by the Government in an effort to protect the best interest of the general public and is concerned with some form of censorship.
Since the 1990’s, the Chinese government has had systems in place that block, monitor, and filter the Internet inside/outside of China (Guobin 52). The ‘Great Firewall’, very well is the largest internet filte...
Rosenthal, Elisabeth. "China Lists Controls To Restrict the Use Of E-mail and Web." The New York Times, 27 January 2000. Retrieved 26 April 2004.