The International Community And Individual Nations

1014 Words5 Pages
There is a litany of problems that pertain to societal issues, which plague the international community and individual nations. In the effort to define the parameters of Proposal B, there are a few issues that we will not address in the overall proposal set. The developing world and developed world alike struggle with infrastructure both initial establishment and maintenance. It is generally understood that the societal issues decrease with better infrastructure and services available, such as health care, communications, running water, and electricity. An additional societal problem is education and the lack of public education in a large portion of the world. One of the central ideas that support the solution to a global threat is education and developing an understanding of basic tenets of humankind. The other issue that will not be addressed is leadership and governance that is defined as extractive. The definition for extractive institutions will be defined in Why Nation’s Fail, “institutions are designed to extract incomes and wealth from one subset of society to benefit a different subset” (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012, p. 76). These are all examples of problem sets that influence the aspects of basic societal issues in a negative manner; however, they have little influence in regards to the concept of Proposal B. There two delineations of the challenge parameters associated with Proposal B; proactive and reactive problem sets. The concept of conflict resolution is can be complex or simple, but often depends on the conflict itself and the players involved. A disagreement between two parties and the parties themselves often have deep, unresolved roots that create the perception of an unsolvable quagmire. The proble... ... middle of paper ... ...en societal issues, conflict resolution, and IO is often subtle, but the impacts that result from understanding this relation can be vital to the betterment of humankind. The path that moves beyond conflicts and toward a less volatile world is through conflict resolution and international understanding of problems. The lowest levels of disagreements should be handled within the nation and not on an international level; however, is the institutional leaders are not capable then there is no resolution. The end state for Proposal B is not to create world police or negotiators; it is simply to provide a tool and education for the representatives of nations. Utilizing national actors as conflict resolution experts enables them to reduce the probability of bloody border disputes or human rights abuses that affect the regional neighbors and the international community.
Open Document