Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Good versus evil in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Good versus evil in literature
The Internal Conflicts of a Reluctant Murder Thought out this passage Patricia Highsmith implements Guy’s night alone as a way to criticize and show her own views on a variety of topics.In particular she condemns the ideas of laws of society and their punishments. Guy scrutinizes the law as something that he is not genuinely concerned about and views their punishments as something that he can view without great concern. Also Highsmith explores the concept of conscience and the weight it can put on a person. Through Guy’s guilt and internal conflict, which is displayed in his thoughts throughout the passage,Highsmith shows the how ones conscience can be conflicted.Lastly Highsmith shows her views on good and evil through Guy’s internal conflict, …show more content…
Referring to an earlier quote Guy compare society’s and the law of conscience , saying “Society’s Law was lax compare to law of conscience”. Guy refers to the law of conscience to be something that is much more foreboding than that of society. Highsmith’s usage of figurative language, viewing the law of conscience as a real entity, leads the read into seeing the impact of guilt is having on Guy. How the tag enable consequence of going to jail and ending is carry seems “lax” compare to the internal conflict that guy is currently feeling. Guy goes on to saying that turning himself in would be a “mere gesture” and that it would be a minor point .He continues exploring the notation of turning himself in, displaying the true depths of Guy’s internal conflict,“a confession seemed a minor point, a mere gesture, even an easy way out, an avoidance of the truth.If the law executed him, it would be a mere gesture.”. Guy guilt is show to be weighting heavily on him, so much so that he feels as though that his own death would not be enough to fix his wrong doing. In this line we see the hopelessness of Guy, that he will not be able to escape this internal guilt that he is feeling. Highsmith usage of repetition,Guy repeating “a mere gesture”, emphasis a feeling of hopelessness.This repetition …show more content…
Guy starts thinking about how is mother always said that evil was external but Guy contrast this idea by say “but love and hate, he thought now, good and evil, lived side by side in human heart, and not merely in differing proportion in one man and the next, but all good and all evil.”,Highsmith implements Guy as a way to show the relationship between good and evil.She uses figurative language to describe good and evil as living next to each other, presenting the idea that good and evil are in all people. The concept of good and evil that Highsmith presents through Guy is a explanation of how Guy, a mostly good person, can do such a heinous an act.Later in the passage Guy says “all things have opposites”, this a direct reflection of Guy and Bruno’s relationship. Guy is the good a person that does not want to murder, while Bruno enjoyed his murder and forced Guy in to killing his father. Though it is seen that Guy feels as though this coupling of good and evil is a necessity when Guy states that “he and Bruno.Each was what the other had not chosen to be, the cast-off self, what he though he hated but perhaps loved.”, Guy shows that he may have secretly love Bruno for what he made him do. The reason is Guy believes in this balance between good and evil,Bruno has brought this too him.
In the book In Cold Blood the people of Holcomb and other friends of the Clutter family are deeply affected by the murders. The people in the town perceive the Clutters as the family “least likely” in the world to be killed. Rejecting the idea that the killers were strangers, many of them become suspicious of everyone and anxious about their own safety in the company of their neighbors. According to Truman Capote, the author, it is the first time the community of this part of Kansas have had to undergo the “unique experience of distrusting each other” (page 88).
Are serial killers inherently evil, or are they just victims of ill-fated destiny and circumstance? The mass murder of a well-known family in Holcomb, Kansas on November 15th, 1959 stirred Truman Capote to work for six years on writing “In Cold Blood” which describes how nature and nurture are involved in the crime committed by Richard Hickock and Perry Smith through explaining backgrounds and experiences that made them what they are. . Capote’s detailed narration from how the suspects planned in killing the family until they were both sentenced to death was emphasized in every character’s dialogue thus further understanding their personalities. Nurture has the
In Harry Mulisch’s novel The Assault, the author not only informs society of the variance in perception of good and evil, but also provides evidence on how important it is for an innocent person experiencing guilt to come to terms with their personal past. First, Mulisch uses the characters Takes, Coster, and Ploeg to express the differences in perspective on the night of the assault. Then he uses Anton to express how one cannot hide from the past because of their guilt. Both of these lessons are important to Mulisch and worth sharing with his readers.
For decades there had been people who were racist and others that felt better because of their skin color. In Truman Capote’s book In Cold Blood these characteristics are captured; however, since its publishing ideals have changed. Some believed that two killers were not given a truly fair trial. Furthermore there was a fight between the system and if the killers should be sentenced to death. This book although effective with style could have used fewer details.
The subject that the author choose is very controversial and it’s touching the needs of the patients that are in the same situation as Mac. Huttmann word of choice helped the audience to really visualize and feel what is happening throughout the story. The way that the author uses her compassionate tone was really effective because the whole story was based on compassion.
This passage defines the character of the narrators’ father as an intelligent man who wants a better life for his children, as well as establishes the narrators’ mothers’ stubbornness and strong opposition to change as key elements of the plot.
A majority of the population has or will gain a bias towards or against a person, place, object, or concept, an example of one of these people is Truman Capote, a successful homosexual writer. He grew up as a openly feminine, gay man, who was neglected by his parent. As his father abandoned him for being different and his mother, an alcoholic, left him with relatives for many years. From this neglect he turned to writing. Wanting to create an interesting new book, he found a news clipping relating to the unsolved murder of the Clutter family. With his interest peaked, he left for Kansas to search for information to figure out the mystery. Using the information he gained from questioning the townspeople and even the murderers themselves, he
...n idea about the human psyche and the nature of evil. Throughout the novels, we have acts that were dubbed as evil. Some of these were: the acts of the rabbi’s son, the killing of Simon, and even the joy Eliezer felt at the death of his father. All of these points and the many that weren’t mentioned all shared a singular idea. It was that the ulterior motive of these acts revolved around people reacting on instinct and desire. From these, we gain the final message of the novel that was proven time and time again. This message was that evil isn’t an act that just isn’t moral. Evil is the primal, instinctual, an animalistic rage that lives in the darker part of our heart, a part of the heart that is brought to light upon the moment the chains of civilization are broken..... A moment where we fall prey to our instincts and our conscience disappears into the darkness.
Within the tortured mind of a young Russian university student, an epic battle rages between two opposite ideologies - the conservative Christianity characteristic of the time, and a new modernist humanism gaining prevalence in academia. Fyodor Dostoevsky in the novel Crime and Punishment uses this conflict to illustrate why the coldly rational thought that is the ideal of humanism represses our essential emotions and robs us of all that is human. He uses the changes in Raskolnikov's mental state to provide a human example of modernism's effect on man, placing emphasis upon the student's quest for forgiveness and the effect of repressed emotion.
As a literal deathbed revelation, William Wilson begins the short story by informing the readers about the end of his own personal struggle by introducing and immediately acknowledging his guilt and inevitable death, directly foreshadowing the protagonist’s eventual downward spiral into vice. The exhortative and confession-like nature of the opening piece stems from the liberal use of the first person pronoun “I”, combined with legal and crime related jargon such as, “ crime”, “guilt”, and “victim” found on page 1. Poe infuses this meticulous word choice into the concretization of abstract ideas where the protagonist’s “virtue dropped bodily as a mantle” (Poe 1), leading him to cloak his “nakedness in triple guilt” (Poe 1). In these two examples, not only are virtue and guilt transformed into physical clothing that can be worn by the narrator, but the reader is also introduced to the protagonist’s propensity to externalize the internal, hinting at the inevitable conclusion and revelation that the second William Wilson is not truly a physical being, but the manifestation of something
In the third story, “A Wall of Fire Rising” Guy, the father, intrigues the reader with his decision making on his life. Beginning when he questions the worth of his life, Guy’s wife, Lili, reassures his thoughts by saying, “A man is judged by his deeds” (Danticat 74) and he always kept his family fed. However, Guy soon came up with his own conclusion as he thought about his poor struggling father, “I remember him as a man that I would never want to be” (Danticat 75). As Guy realizes the
In the novel by Patrick Ness the protagonist – Todd Hewit, a young boy is thrust in to the world, which is unknown to him. Together with his companions – his loyal dog Munchee and the first girl he has ever seen Viola, he must outrun an army with his tyrant mayor, and his insane priest, who is trying to kill them. During this journey, Todd realises how oblivious he has been his whole life. The good in this novel is shown by the help of Todd and his thoughts, it can be mentioned that on the planet where he lives, every thought of males can be heard, unless one is able to control them. The battle of good and evil in the novel can also be described as the fight Todd battles in his journey, when he is made to work under the mayor as his subordinate. Todd understands that the things he must do are immoral, but in some cases he forgets that, because of the persuasion of the Mayor, who in this case is the antagonist. Todd gets to understand his wrong doings by the help of his companion – Viola. (Ness,
Before I began reading John Grisham’s The Confession, my opinion against the death penalty was simple: I was against it. In The Confession, John Grisham tries to persuade his audience to agree that capital punishment is wrong by using his character’s opinions to voice his own, and describing any character that supported the death penalty in an unflattering light. His main theme was that Donte, an innocent man is executed because he was unjustly sentenced to death. Although, Grisham’s The Confession describes a fictitious situation in which the death penalty should have been left off the table because an innocent man was killed, the chances of something like that happening in reality are
Michael Sanders, a Professor at Harvard University, gave a lecture titled “Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? The Moral Side of Murder” to nearly a thousand student’s in attendance. The lecture touched on two contrasting philosophies of morality. The first philosophy of morality discussed in the lecture is called Consequentialism. This is the view that "the consequences of one 's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.” (Consequentialism) This type of moral thinking became known as utilitarianism and was formulated by Jeremy Bentham who basically argues that the most moral thing to do is to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people possible.
“Orient Express is arguably her most enduring work as far as the average reader goes, due to the daring gimmick the author was able to pull off: they all did it ("Murder on the Orient" 155). This critical comment made by Greg Wilson gives an accurate depiction to the mystery that Agathe Christie builds up in her book. The Murder on the Orient Express has many aspects that played big roles in creating the novel. The way the author uses the aspects, such as plot, setting, the author 's style, and the characters are what made the book suspenseful and intriguing to the reader.