Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of knowledge trust belief
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of knowledge trust belief
The Importance of Disctinction Between Knowledge and Belief in Philosophy
To try and decipher the distinction between knowledge and belief we
must first understand what the meaning of Philosophy is. In its
simplest definition it translates to “the love of wisdom” taken from
the Greek word “philo” which means love and “sophia” meaning wisdom.
Philosophers love to know the truth about the general principles of
the world and they pursue the truth in these. Through the ages many
philosophers have been on a personal quest to discover the principles
of the universe and explain what is meant by knowledge and belief.
An opinion, statement or teaching can be a belief and to believe means
to regard or to accept what is being said is true, but it does not
have to be true to be believable. Descartes (1596–1650) was a
Rationalist; he believed he had to doubt everything known to him to
really understand knowledge. He defined belief as an active state of
mind in which agreement is either given or withheld to the
proposition. Whether he was awake or dreaming he was never in any
doubt that he was thinking and that his thoughts were real, hence his
famous quote “I think therefore I am”.
Others such as Hume (1711-1776) an empiricist went against the ideas
of rationalists, whilst identifying with belief being a particular
state of the mind considered it to be a passive state, which either
occurs or is absent in respect of the given proposition. In other
words we believe what we believe because of ‘custom and habit’. For
instance, the sun rises every day as we know it, so it is fair to
assume it will rise tomorrow morning and the morning after and...
... middle of paper ...
...een put out of his suffering and misery and
that if one were to treat an animal in this way would they not be
chastised for being cruel to animals. However, I have to consider if I
was faced with the same decision would I rather he were alive in some
form or would I be brave enough to let him go and grieve his death.
For all the opinions, beliefs, philosophical hypothesis, ethics and
morals there is no right answer but having an understanding of these
matters can help and guide us when faced with a medical decision that
will never be easy to make.
* * * * *
Bases on information from:
1. World Library & Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2 Edition
2. http://www.questia.com/Index.jsp?CRID=medical_ethics&OFFID=se1&KEY=medical_ethics
3. Lecture hand out on Bertram Russell
He discusses "animals subjected every year to agonizing research center experiments"(Rifkin) and "raised under the most heartless conditions." He additionally cites that animals are "for butcher and human utilization." These words, words like subjected, coldhearted, and butcher have staggeringly negative meanings and infer thoughts of ruthlessness and viciousness. On the off chance that we take after Rifkin 's reasoning, and animals resemble individuals, and we butcher (for eating no less) and place needles in their eyes in a lab- - that is essentially unsatisfactory. This is the thing that Rifkin need us to get it. For Rifkin, this is the present circumstance however it doesn 't need to be. On the off chance that people comprehend that animals are particularly similar to us, we will need them to be treated with the same admiration and poise. Right now, we are not doing this. However, we can.
and to deny that its meaning is not completely true in all senses is a
Why is it important to know what you believe and why you believe it? While reflecting upon this question I found myself turning to the scripture in 1 Peter 3:15 “But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,” (NIV) Can other’s see your hope in Christ? Are you prepared to tell them what Christ has done in your life? Christians should always be prepared to give an answer when asked about our faith (what we believe and why). 2 Timothy 2:25 states “in humility correcting those who are in opposition, if God, perhaps will grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth, “(NKJV) By knowing what we believe and why we believe it, we, as Christians, are able to listen to question and respond respectfully, while avoiding debate, and those who oppose our belief will be more willing to
...nger states “Equality is a moral idea, not an assertion of fact. There is no logically compelling reason for assuming that a factual difference in ability between two people justifies any difference in the amount of consideration we give to their needs and interests”. Singer argues that, as there is no justification for unequal treatment of human beings based on capacity, it is also unjustifiable to treat human and non-human animals differently based on their capacities.
...that what they believe might not be correct, it is what they believe but others do not have to believe that they are right.
that it "it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient
Ascione’s (1993) definition of animal cruelty is defined as “socially unacceptable behavior that intentionally causes unnecessary pain, suffering, or distress to and/or death of an animal” exclusive of socially condoned behavior, such as legal hunting and certain agricultural and veterinary practices. Not all violent individuals have been previously cruel to animals but studies have shown that a great number of them have exhibited this behavior. A great majority of the literature calls for a better understandin...
“There can be many reason for animal cruelty, like any other form of violence, is often committed by a person who feels powerless, unnoticed, or under control of others. Some who are cruel to animals copy acts what they have seen or that have been done to them, others see harming an animal as a safe way to get revenge against--or threaten-- someone who cares about that animal”. (“Animal… Statistics”) Concerns towards abusing animals have gone up in the past. Although there are not many cases on animal abuse, many have occurred. Abusers are charged with Criminal Animal Abuse and then sentenced to life in prison. Some animals that are physically abused are sometimes rescued by Animal Control, and are taken it to an animal shelter. However, many shelters have not had the space to keep the animals so the workers would have to put them down (Carol Roach). Researchers have shown that the main animals getting abused are dogs, chickens, horses, and livestock (“Animal...
...serve that their peers hold their own views with equal strength, which often contradict one another. An umbrella defense mechanism for one's own pride is to put a disclaimer on all of one's beliefs that there is a possibility that they are mistaken. This is merely a nominal statement, and all the parties involved are aware that the person is not actually pointing out his own faults. This approach, however, creates the same paradox, because one would not need to create a defense mechanism against being wrong if he truly believed that he was right!
... is often what we are taught, even if there is evidence contradicting what we believe.
... concept. An animal cannot follow our rules of morality, “Perhaps most crucially, what other species can be held morally accontable” (Scully 44). As a race humans must be humane to those that cannot grasp the concept. Animals do not posess human rights but they posess the right to welfare and proper treatment by their handlers.
It’s fair to assume there should be disparity between the way cats and cows are treated, or the way chickens and dogs are. Certain animals have their place in the animal kingdom, grazing animals like cows and chickens have historically been used as a food source since the concept of animal husbandry was introduced, on the other end of the spectrum cats and dogs have been domesticated and kept as common house pets. The suggestion that livestock have the same emotions and feelings as a typical housecat can be up to debate. Peter Singer states that the behavior of some apes, dolphins and dogs suggest they have emotions and desires. All of the evidence, or the lack thereof, leads to issues concerning the ethical treatment of all animals.
...onclude by saying that there are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false. It depends upon perception, emotions, reasoning and language. And therefore we cannot prove anyone wrong by saying that this is the perfect or right way of looking at things as every individual has different perceptions based on reasoning, emotions and language. So one should learn to accept other people’s opinions and perceptions as nobody is likely to have a same perception like others. The distinctions would be relative in various areas of knowledge like the ones discussed above.
Truth and beliefs contribute in building the knowledge of a person. Cogent reasons for the beliefs convert the beliefs into knowledge. However, sometimes the beliefs are actually assumption, so they may be wrong. Truth is the facts known from different sources. Something can be considered as knowledge, only if it is true. The word epistemology refers to studying the source of knowledge. The epistemology helps in understanding the process of development of knowledge, sources of knowledge and makes distinctions between belief and actual truth. I critically examined and analyzed the origin and the process of acquiring the knowledge for the two essays I wrote earlier. One essay, an analytical one, was written on the subject of increasing prison population and improper justice system. The second essay was written on the subject of human resource management. To develop the knowledge and understanding I demonstrated in the essays, I had to search for resources, rationalize the information gained and evaluate it in conjunction with my personal beliefs.
Throughout the history of the world, there have been subjects of heated debates; there are a few facts that are undisputed. One of the undisputed facts is that animals existed and inhabited the planet before humans did and humans have been dependent on animals for thousands of years. Animals have played a very vital part in our history and one wonders whys should they be treated with much cruelty. While animals have been a great resource, a steady supply of food and clothing and even security, our treatment towards them has become nothing short of appalling. Since humans are dependent on animals for their well being, their comfort and at times their religion, there should be a moral obligation to treat animals.