Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
On liberty freedom of speech
Freedom of speech amendment
Freedom of speech constitution important
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: On liberty freedom of speech
Whistleblowing is when criminal wrong doing is reported to the authorities by an employee of a company. Typical charges brought up are mismanagement, errors in financial reporting, cover-up of public health concerns and other issues that may negatively affect shareholders or the general public. Providing protection for whistleblowers is essential because people inside the company have the most direct access to the inner workings of the organization. Whistleblowers can help protect the public, an industry and even their own company from the negative actions of individuals within the organization. Protection also acts as deterrent from management making questionable decisions that they may have to defend if one person within the organization …show more content…
Constitution protects free speech. This amendment can provide protection for government employees who are exposing a matter of “public concern”. They have the right to speak out if the government is doing something which is a safety or environmental concern. Whistleblowers in private employees can’t use the First Amendment for protection.
The False Claims Act encourages individuals with knowledge of fraud against the government to come forward by authorizing them to file an action in the name of the government. They are then eligible to receive with a percentage of any recovery achieved by that lawsuit. This act has proven to be one of the most effective mechanisms to recover funds that have been stolen from the government through fraud by corporations, contractors, and individuals. Since 1986, more than 5,500 actions have been filed and more than $20 billion in settlements have been recovered by the
…show more content…
Speculation or second-hand information is not enough. To prove that retaliation occurred, proof must be offered that the claimant disclosed the misconduct and that any adverse actions they endured (such as firing, transfer, demotion, pay cut, significant change in duties, failing to promote, etc.) were in some way related to the disclosure.
The Florida False Claims Act allows whistleblowers to sue in the name of the State of Florida where a wrongdoer engages in conduct that defrauds the state or local governments of taxpayer dollars. The purpose of the Florida False Claims Act is to prevent people from knowingly causing state government to pay claims that are false. It provides remedies for obtaining damages and civil penalties for state government when money is obtained from state government by reason of a false claim. This act allows whistleblowers to receive 15-30% of the proceeds in a successful
Defamation is a tort action that has been widely recognized, nonetheless, it has only been within recent years, that the concept has been increasingly utilized in the employment context (Mcconnell, 2000, p. 78) . However, it is useful to first lay out the elements of the defamation tort as they occur in the employment setting. First, there must be a false, and defamatory statement. A statement is defamatory if it harms the employee's reputation or discourages others; such as potential employers, from wanting to have any contact with the employee. Second, the statement, be it written or oral, must be "published," that is, transmitted to a third party. Next, the defendant/employer must be responsible for the publication of the false and defamatory statement. Last, defamation damage to the plaintiff must occur; caused either by the statement itself, or by its actionable
If the plaintiff can prove prima facie the burden shifts to the employer. The employer must provide evidence that they fired the plaintiff for reasons other than discrimination. If the employer can prove this, the burden shifts back to the employee. The employee must then prove that the reasons the employer gave for termination are a pretext for discrimination. If the plaintiff can prove pretext, the court will find that the employer discriminated under disparate
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was drafted to encourage and protect whistleblowers from retaliation after the fraud scandal that cause the collapse of Enron in 2001. In a 2010 Senate Report found that “external auditors detected only 4.1 percent of uncovered fraud schemes, “whistleblower tips detected 54.1% of uncovered fraud schemes in public companies” and were thirteen times more effective than external audits” (Turpan, 2016). Whistleblowers serve an important service to the public and are more effective than external audits. The CFAA has been used to by employers to retaliate against employees who act as informants for agencies like Internal Revenue Service or Security Exchange Commission to expose fraud. There employees, not to their financial gain, gather information as evidence of fraud by the company. With a broad interpretation of CFAA, the employee would "exceed their authority" and was "unauthorized" to access the information, therefore allowing the company to hide their illegal
Lahman, Larry D. 2005. Bad mule: A primer on the Federal False Claims Act. The Oklahoma
CPA’s have a confidentiality obligation to not distribute client information, which extends to the actions of the firms that deal with client matters, such as failed audits (workplaceethicsadvice.com). A whistleblower can come out and show these audits that are kept a secret and be protected under the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act allows accountants to come forward without punishment and possibly be rewarded with a financial bonus. Even though there will not be any punishment for being a whistle blower, accountants still hesitate because of the image it sends to the companies they may be working for. Corporate accountants might be seen as dishonest or disloyal if they blow the whistle on the wrongdoing of their
The term Whistleblower means “An employee who discloses information that s/he reasonably believes is evidence of illegality, gross waste or fraud, mismanagement, abuse of power, general wrongdoing, or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. When information is classified or otherwise restricted by Congress or Executive Order, disclosures only are protected as whistleblowing if made through designated, secure channels. (What is a Whistleblower?)” The idea behind whistleblowers is that they believe trying to inform the public of illegal acts within their businesses has the potential to protect the public from wrongdoing. The following studies analyze scholar’s findings on different factors related to whistle blowing as
... of it in the courts and to the extent that whistleblowers would take into account probable success in the courts ex ante—there certainly seem to be high information costs here that might lead us to believe individuals probably are not aware enough of the success of other whistleblowers to really effect their behavior at the margins, though lawyers, if any group, would seem at least decently likely take this into account in their decision-making process—this would raise the costs of whistleblowing even higher than its current lofty bar. Moreover, although the SEC takes a pretty broad definition of appearing before the commission in its rules for attorneys, the risk of being outside this uncertain range likely deters whistleblowing. Of course, there is additionally a large body of potentially fraudulent behavior entirely outside the scope of federal securities law.
On November 29th, Mary Inman gave us a talk on the topic whistleblowing, which let me know more about the whistleblower activities and the whistleblower protection. According to the definition given by the website whistleblowers international, whistleblowing is someone who reveal the unethical or illegal activities within the company. The person can be current or past employee, or an outside individual who is familiar with the unethical activity. This whistleblower does not need to be U.S. citizen.
must ensure the victim is able to recover the damage caused by the fraudster. The Fraud
First I will be telling you about the pressure of being a “whistleblower”. In Fahrenheit 451 the pressure of being a “whistleblower” is so real, everyone is told to rat out everyone who has a book in their household, if they find out they have a book in the home it is burned to the ground. This is related to our society because we are pressured to do what is right, and part of my belief system is to do what is right and to point out what is wrong. For example if someone were to gossip behind their back I would try to stand up and tell them it is wrong and tell the person what the others said
Facts of the case: Anna’s immediate supervisor, Michael, repeatedly required that she have “closed door” meetings with him. Closed-door meetings violate company policy. Other employees were aware of these closed-door meetings and, as a result, rumors began to spread that Anna and Michael were having an office romance. In fact, in these closed-door meetings Michael tried to convince Anna to lend him money, a practice that also violates company policy. Anna repeatedly denied the request and Michael stopped asking. However, the rumors continued and affected Anna deeply. She was treated like an outcast by her co-workers. Anna asked Michael to clear up the rumors, but he found them amusing. Anna had two evaluations where she scored low points for “integrity” and “interpersonal relations” as a consequence of the rumors. She was passed over for two promotions for which she applied where her skills and experience were superior to the employees who were promoted. She filed an action against her employer on the ground that her supervisor had created a hostile work environment because he refused to stop the rumors.
Weld, L. G., Bergevin, P. M., & Magrath, L. (2004). Anatomy of a financial fraud. The CPA
Although Hollate introduced a compliance program and code of conduct when it went public, the programs were put on “the back burner”. This outcome is not surprised for that the company does not pay attention to the programs. It is, therefore, important to “reinforce the values” and “employee a boundary system when actions are inconsistent with the code of conduct” for the purpose of early detection. Tyco provides a good example after its scandal, by initiating “mandatory annual compliance training for all its employees worldwide” and creating the Tyco Guide to Ethical Conduct to familiarize employees with company expectations and help them make ethical decisions. As tips is the most useful method for internal and external sources to detect frauds, the whistleblower hotline should be well communicated with encouragement on reporting any suspicious activity. In addition, to improve the effectiveness of the compliance program and code of conducts, Hollate should implement management monitoring and evaluation on a regular
In relation to Misconduct, the employer must conduct an investigation to determine whether there are grounds for disciplinary action or dismissal.
Whistle blowing is an attempt of an employee or former employee of a company to reveal what he or she believes to be a wrongdoing in or by a company or organization. Whistle blowing tries to make others aware of practices that are considered illegal or immoral. If the wrongdoing is reported to someone in the company it is said to be internal. Internal whistle blowing tends to do less damage to the company. There is also external whistle blowing. This is where the wrongdoing is reported to the media and brought to the attention of the public. This type of whistle blowing tends to affect the company in a negative way because of bad publicity. It is said that whistle blowing is personal if the wrongdoing affects the whistle blower alone (like sexual harassment), and said to be impersonal if the wrongdoing affects other people. Many people whistle blow for two main reasons: morality and revenge.