In any line of work it's important to stick tightly to a consistent procedure to ensure success. This applies particularly to philosophers and scientists as they credit their successes to the scientific method. The scientific method is a tool used for answering faltering theories or questions. Acclaimed scientists owe their achievements to this technique. The scientific method is used to answer phenomenons in the world, whether they be specific or general. Experimenters use this tool solely to prove their claim and ensure the results are reliable. As stated by professor Frank Wolffs,” the process by which scientists, collectively and over time, endeavor to construct an accurate (that is, reliable, consistent and non-arbitrary) representation …show more content…
Then, one must make a prediction, a guess for the outcome which is much more specific in contrast to the hypothesis. It is crucial to make sure the experimenter’s format is structured and consistent. It is additionally important to keep in mind that the entire experiment is controlled except for the variable one is testing, ensuring the most accurate results. Neither the prediction and hypothesis should be changed. As stated, ”An incorrect prediction does NOT mean that you ‘failed.’ It just means that the experiment brought some new facts to light that maybe you hadn't thought about before”(The Scientific Method,1). This in turn is important for refinement in the end of the experiment, which can only boost the reliability of one's data. Eventually the next stage is the experiment, the part that tests out ones hypothesis and designed to find if one’s idea was wrong or not. Lastly the final step is the conclusion in which the experimenter summarizes how the data corresponds to the hypothesis. The conclusion can be written in two ways; one may reject or not reject the hypothesis. Ultimately, these steps are what make this method as structured and simple to follow as it is. The scientific method is the uttermost logical process that lets scientists learn about the world. As trained as a scientist may be there's no saying opinions would never influence an experiment, so this tool eliminates any chance of bias within one's theory. Without this significant blueprint perhaps half of what has been discovered in this world would be
...overies in geography, technology, and navigation, all of which were important in the years to come. Thus, the scientific method laid the framework for the development of a more modern and accurate understanding of the world.
One would think that science is methodological. After all, the sole purpose of science is to discover universal truths. There are practices meant to remove any bias, such as peer review, repeatability studies, and a hard reliance
In order to properly extricate the truth from the fallacies of psuedopsychology the scientific method can be used as a tool. The scientific method is a form of critical thinking based on a careful collection of evidence, accurate description and measurement, precise definition, controlled observation, and repeatable results (Jackson, 2008). This method is composed of 6 bodies: 1. Make Observations; 2. Defining a Problem; 3. Proposing a Hypothesis; 4. Gathering evidence/Test Hypothesis; 5. Interpret/Analyze Data and Draw Conclusions; 6.Publishing Results, many scientist retest their experiment for more accurate results.
The article Best Idea: Eyes Wide Open by Richard Powers discusses different aspects of the scientific method. It begins by talking about a man named Abu Ali al-Hasan Ibn al-Haytham who made discoveries regarding vision. He did this by simply performing observations and having people stare directly at the sun. Ibn al-Haytham changed the way science was viewed by telling people to simply look in order to gain information. Later, William of Ockham came up with the idea that “when you have multiple ways to explain something, go with the one that has the least amount of assumptions” (Powers, 1999, p. 4). My interpretation of this is that you shouldn’t make something harder than it needs to be. Do not assume, but rather work with the observations and experiments that you have performed. This idea eventually became known as Ockham’s Razor. Rene Descartes went in a different direction and believed that all science can be demonstrated by a series of deductions and self-evident facts, instead of something that is run through observation and experimentation.
Science is a way of approaching the world, knowing why and how things around us are occurring. The scientific method allows scientists to be precise and focused. Through that medium, they can determine which hypotheses are consistently supported such that they become theories and which need more modification or rejection. This type of knowing can be tested and quantified. Scientists strive to make their observations as objective as possible, to be devoid of human interest. Scientists try to control all the variables ...
Science is the knowledge gained by a systematic study, knowledge which then becomes facts or principles. In the systematic study; the first step is observation, the second step hypothesis, the third step experimentation to test the hypothesis, and lastly the conclusion whether or not the hypothesis holds true. These steps have been ingrained into every student of science, as the basic pathway to scientific discovery. This pathway holds not decision as to good or evil intention of the experiment. Though, there are always repercussions of scientific experiments. They range from the most simplistic realizations of the difference between acid and water to the principle that Earth is not the center of the Universe. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein depicts this very difference in the story of Victor Frankenstein. A scientist who through performing his experiments creates a monster which wreaks havoc upon humanity. Frankenstein concentrating wholly upon discovery ignores the consequences of his actions.
Scientists make progress by using the scientific method, a process of checking conclusions against nature. After observing something, a scientist tries to explain what has been seen. The explanation is called a hypothesis. There is always at least one alternative hypothesis. A part of nature is tested in a "controlled experiment" to see if the explanation matches reality. A controlled experiment is one in which all treatments are identical except that some are exposed to the hypothetical cause and some are not.
The scientific method is the analyzation of evidence, to examine a case from every angle possible, to not give up on an investigation until all of the angles are covered and to not allow personal emotions create a bias in their mind (Osterburg 2010). A scientific method example would be when an investigator arrives to a crime scene, they would first search the area for clues and see if something doesn’t seem right. Next they would have to search for different forms of evidence, most important would be trace evidence because it can provide DNA evidence which can also link a suspect to the crime. There are many more ways evidence and other clues can be harvested from a crime scene but it is up to the investigator to use their knowledge and help find the person responsible for the crime
During this course, I have learned about scientific merit and why it is essential to the field of psychology and research. Scientific merit is comprised of three dimensions that consist of the advancement knowledge base, contribution to theory, and meeting the hallmark of good research. When scientific merit is high the study has contributed meaningful, valid and valuable data (Capella University, n.d). The first requirement that must be establish in obtaining scientific merit is advance the knowledge base. For instance, a researcher must determine whether or not the study addresses something that is not known or has not been considered sometime recently?
...g organism that evolves over time and combines various different processes (in our case ideas, beliefs, values, etc…) in an efficient manner to produce a field that effectively answers many problems that we have about the world. To me, It is a given fact that scientists are humans as well, humans who bring with them a wide range of beliefs, experiences, knowledge, etc…. and the way that science works is through a process of all of these various beliefs, experiences, knowledge, etc…. coming together to try and find a solution that in the end is void of such subjective matters. Every scientist interprets data in a different way, and for science to make progress all scientist have to agree on a common conclusion to such data. As Longino explains, after peer review, criticisms, and revision the final product is a solution that explains the world in an objective manner.
Working with the Hypothesis involves the processes of look at both the data collected and the test results and if it confirms the hypothesis. (Salkind, 2012)
The issue shall discuss the various differences between science and other types of knowledge and discuss the argument whether the science can rely without the separate theories posted by non-scientific educational bodies. ...
Anything that can be studied is absolutely considered a science. When people think of science and the scientific method they most often think of chemicals. Human experiment’s can also be conducted and considered scientific. The scientific method can be used to study people. Simply start by asking a question, doing background research, and then constructing a hypothesis. When studying people or their culture you can absolutely start with these simple steps, therefore using science to study these people. After determining your hypothesis, you can test it with an experiment, record your results and form a conclusion. “Science is the best system yet devised for reducing subjective bias, error, untruths, lies, and frauds.” (Harris, 1994, Pg. 6) Harris states that using science is they best way to prevent errors or miscalculations. We use science everyday; to assess every situation, and every problem that we have, even when we don’t think we a...
problem, formation of hypothesis, data collections by observing and experimenting. At all stages of the
A team of scientists can observe the same phenomenon under investigation. They can then formulate a hypothesis to account for those behaviors. They can then form experiments so they can confirm or reject those hypothesis designed to explain the behavior of organisms.