These are important factors because education is the future generation’s goal. If the technology is not more modern than our time, we have already fallen behind and are failing to provide every student an equal opportunity to learn for their future. Even with the imperativeness education technologies must modernize, there are opponents who claim too much is changing too fast. There are also those who have further concern that students will be overwhelmed and distracted by the vast content available on the Web. Even so, the advancements in education technologies offer many more affordances than disadvantages.
For the first option, t... ... middle of paper ... ... versus electronic books that are accessed on tablets. In conclusion there are many pros and cons of having tablets in the classroom. The pros include eliminating the need for textbooks, it can teach the primary students about technology early, and it is a new innovative way to assist teaching. The cons against tablets in the classroom are that they are pricey and there is low funding in the schools where the student’s families cannot afford them. Also, the primary students have short attention span and without the proper monitoring the tablets can be distracting.
Yesterday’s Leapfrog Reading systems grow dust, displaced by this year’s new online reading comprehension program. “A shrinking but still relatively significant percentage of educators—especially those who are 55 and older—don’t feel confident with these new technologies” (Wong ¶ 17) is especially important when those older educators have higher positions in the school hierarchy to affect curriculum changes. Other teachers oppose the integration of technology as it increases the time they need to spend preparing to teach. “[M]any teachers simply feel overburdened by the new technology”(Wong ¶ 17), which should come as no surprise given the ever-changing district, state and nation-wide curriculum changes educators must regularly adapt to. The many hours put in off the clock to learn to use and set up MobyMax for an elementary class will be for naught when CCSD announces the change to ST Math the following year.
The curriculum should drive the technology, and computers shouldn’t be used just because there is one in the room. Maybe that is the new art of teaching. Teachers will creatively construct units and lessons that will use technology in conjunction with methods that teachers and students are familiar with, but also in fresh, novel ways, and the end result will be increased learning that will be observable not only on standardized tests, but more importantly, beyond.
He states, “Computers make our worst educational nightmare come true.” (279). According to him the improper or overuse of computer hinders the learning ability. He reports the fact that over past few years computers has been assumed to be a necessity in America’s classrooms. Computers have been introduced to children from the elementary levels. Technology c... ... middle of paper ... ...o get attracted by easy and quick ways of learning things.
This implies that despite having gone through the education system, these graduates lack the ability for to perform advanced tasks in reading and writing such as filling out a job application and tax form. The reason identified in this research paper include the practice of social promotion, the use of too many movie assignments and cheating in academic tests and assignments. Obviously, the high level of functional illiteracy among high school graduates is alarming and calls for immediate intervention to prevent the statistics from rising to uncontrolled levels. A literate society is a successful society, thus it is high time that the school administrators and other stakeholders came up with effective measures to prevent cheating, which has been identified as the worst factor that is promoting the level of functional illiteracy among high school graduates.
Because of this sense of fear and stigma of being wrong placed in the classroom, and a huge focus on standardized testing, our potential to become creative, imaginative thinkers is hindered. Adolescence is a crucial time for development, and one skill that we should continuously nurture and practice is creativity. This is the kind of conclusion Ken Robinson comes to in his Ted Talk, How Schools Kill Creativity. Robinson makes note that ¨because of this lack of development, we could potentially grow up to be adults that can never come up with anything original." Kyung Hee Kim, a creativity researcher at the College of William and Mary, stated that since 1990 children have become “less able to produce unique and unusual ideas.” He explains how he believes that the program instilled in our educational system, No Child Left Behind, has really hurt creativity: “If we just focus on … testing, testing, testing, then how can creative students survive?"
The reason that there hasn’t been an impact on education is because the education governance system protects technology from the problems that it creates for other organizations. He states that technology is very beneficial when it comes to learning. A strategy he mentions to persuade teachers to use technology is to select technologies by choosing which technologies are best for them could be very useful because they won’t have to use multiple resources. According to Neil Kokemuller, an administrator on “Globalpost”, America’s world new site, technology has had an important impact on schools and students at all levels. Student’s attention and motivation has enhanced due to the use of technology.
Some teenagers end up having more concerns with their clothing style and popularity rank than they do about their grades in school. In the article “The Uncool Effects of Obsession with Coolness,” the author states that, “In American high schools, the negotiation of social status drives student behavior, steering students away from the study of science, engineering, and technology” (pg. 2). This “cool trend” does a disservice to the future of America and its advancement in technology and science. With such a limited amount of students caring about improving the future’s technology, the country will find itself losing its leadership crown and will start trailing behind other countries and their technologies.
This is important because school systems will be allowed to cut back there spending money on building larger schools and they can then focus on gett... ... middle of paper ... ...uth. Things such as this cannot be done as easily in a short break. The idea of year-round school is becoming a more and more controversial issue with everyday that passes. The benefits and downfalls are all very powerful and each hold strong points. It doesn’t seem that the debate is going to end soon, but with more and more experiments going on with the educational systems, maybe we’ll have a concrete answer soon on which form of the school year is better.