Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
role of modern society
effects of modernity on society
society and its impacts on the modern world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: role of modern society
The space in which we live, which draws us out of ourselves, in which the erosion of our lives, our time, and our history occurs, the space that claws and gnaws at us, is also, in itself, a heterogeneous space. In other words, we do not live in a kind of void, inside of which we could place individuals and things. We do not live inside a void that could be coloured with diverse shades of light, we live inside a set of relations that delineates sites which are irreducible to one another and absolutely not superimposable on one another. (Foucault 2002, 231)
Foucault, in the above passage, from Of Other Spaces, is making an observation on the way that individuals exists within space. In this short paper I will attempt to delve into more detail and interpret the above paragraph using comparisons to some of the writings of Zygmunt Bauman and Nicholas Mirzoeff and some of my own understanding and reflection.
To begin with, Foucault discusses how we do not live in a void, that we are impacted by the heterogeneous space of the world around us. It would be extremely naïve to think that we could operate in isolation and without being affected by our contact with the world beyond our individual sphere. Bauman discusses the idea of residing
…show more content…
Furthermore, Mirzoeff’s observations highlight the heterogeneous nature of modern societies, where cultures are able to mingle with one another, creating new spaces which form a reflection of the past, present and future based on the hybrid nature of society. Thus, we are able to illustrate that although we may be individuals occupying our own unique position in time and space that space is not without outside influences and pressures affecting it even though it may at least appear to be a completely delineated space, distinct from spaces around
Winokur, Mark. “The Ambiguous Panopticon: Foucault and the Codes of Cyberspace” CTHEORY.NET. 13 March 2003. Access date : 28 April 2005. < http://www.ctheory.net/text_file.asp?pick=371>
How can two people in the same room look at the same thing and see it differently? The diversity of our culture gives us these different perspectives. The works, “My Mother Pieced Quilts”, “Everyday Use”, and “By Any Other Name” demonstrate this concept of our culture influencing our perspective.
According to Foucault, the individual is created and removed from the society by subjecting him to certain norms. This ensures that the individual is created to fit into an already constructed power hierarchy as opposed to creating a society in which individuals a...
Although the book has many stories to tell, all with something in common but yet with a different feature, the point of the book was to not only educate the world about these situations but to also give us real scenarios that we all can relate to in some sort of fashion. This book is about the human mind and the abstractness of our visions and memories. Everything affects us physically and mentally. We all share a common feature; we are all simply human with simple human minds.
Descartes’ epiphany of “I exist, I am” was the catalyst for the exploration of the issues he discusses in Meditations. Although I find problems in some instances of his reasoning, I realize that he has provided answers through his Method of Doubt that have endured the ages and allow us to continue to ponder their truth today.
In this essay, I will argue that Descartes’ argument that attempts to call into question the physical is unsound. The reasoning behind Descartes’ argument lies in his sixth meditation, which states that (a) The mind is understood to be indivisible, (b) The body is understood to be divisible, so therefore, (c) The mind must be different from the body (Descartes 52-57). I will be arguing for this view of the separation of body and mind, and in conclusion, I will provide a counter-argument to Descartes’ proposal.
The things that make one different are the things that cause the world to change and lead to conformity. Uniqueness is a characteristic that is in everyone; no one person is the same. In this way, Equality 7-2521 from Anthem, a novel written by Ayn Rand, conforms to society on his outward actions to keep him safe, but on this inside, his drive for individuality and not being “normal” allows him to discover a tunnel in which he discovers multiple things like electricity. In a similar aspect, I seek to with my mind, as if a moving vehicle, swerve sharply to the opposite direction to avoid indifference and achieve my maximum potential.
Pioneering Space " That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind. " Those words, spoken by Neil Armstrong, the first man to set foot on the moon, have passed into history. Their emotional delivery, their meaning, and the historically monumental event they commemorate make them some of the most famous words ever spoken.
backbone of Descartes whole philosophy of our existence in reality. As long as we are thinking things, we exist.
Descartian dualism is one of the most long lasting legacies of Rene Descartes’ philosophy. He argues that the mind and body operate as separate entities able to exist without one another. That is, the mind is a thinking, non-extended entity and the body is non-thinking and extended. His belief elicited a debate over the nature of the mind and body that has spanned centuries, a debate that is still vociferously argued today. In this essay, I will try and tackle Descartes claim and come to some conclusion as to whether Descartes is correct to say that the mind and body are distinct.
Rene Descartes decision to shatter the molds of traditional thinking is still talked about today. He is regarded as an influential abstract thinker; and some of his main ideas are still talked about by philosophers all over the world. While he wrote the "Meditations", he secluded himself from the outside world for a length of time, basically tore up his conventional thinking; and tried to come to some conclusion as to what was actually true and existing. In order to show that the sciences rest on firm foundations and that these foundations lay in the mind and not the senses, Descartes must begin by bringing into doubt all the beliefs that come to him by the senses. This is done in the first of six different steps that he named "Meditations" because of the state of mind he was in while he was contemplating all these different ideas. His six meditations are "One:Concerning those things that can be called into doubt", "Two:Concerning the Nature of the Human mind: that it is better known than the Body", "Three: Concerning God, that he exists", "Four: Concerning the True and the False", "Five: Concerning the Essence of Material things, and again concerning God, that he exists" and finally "Six: Concerning the Existence of Material things, and the real distinction between Mind and Body". Although all of these meditations are relevant and necessary to understand the complete work as a whole, the focus of this paper will be the first meditation.
. Its most famous defender is Descartes, who argues that as a subject of conscious thought and experience, he cannot consist simply of spatially extended matter. His essential nature must be non-m...
Boundaries are an integral part of being alive and therefore they are present at every stage of the process of living. This makes them, first of all, necessary because they contribute to the creation of all animate and inanimate forms. Without boundaries there would be no form; there would only be an ever-expanding mass. At the same time boundaries can also be constricting, limiting, especially if accepted as insurmountable and all encompassing. When this happens, boundaries can stunt growth on all levels; they can turn something historical that should be analyzed, understood and placed within its proper context into something natural or worse, eternal. In the formation novel My Brilliant Friend, boundaries play a variety of contrasting roles
In the following paper I will argue upon whether the Humes’ or Descartes’ philosophical position on the existence of the external world is stronger than the other. I will first present each philosopher’s position, and then I will argue that Hume has a stronger position on the existence of the external world for the reason in this paper.
To counter balance Cartesianism Hirsch puts forward Vico’s argument of ‘sensory topics’ which places imagery of shared identities and interactions at the heart of the landscape. The relationship between the physical and the metaphorical whilst very separate can be united. Only when the physical place or subject oriented (‘indexical’) place can be examined then the metaphorical space, non-subject orientated (‘non-indexical’) can begin to be understood (Gell, 1985). Thus the development of the indexical (e.g. maps) can lead to the understanding of the non-dexical (e.g. images). Mutually related.